APA (7th ed.) Citation

Sabran, L. (1688). Dr. Sherlock's Preservative considered: The first part, and its Defence, proved to contain principles which destroy all right use of reason, Fathers, Councils, undermine divine faith, and abuse moral honesty ; In the second part, forty malicious calumnies and forged untruths laid open ; besides several fanatical principles which destroy all church discipline, and oppose Christs divine authority. Printed by Henry Hills ....

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Sabran, Lewis. Dr. Sherlock's Preservative Considered: The First Part, and Its Defence, Proved to Contain Principles Which Destroy All Right Use of Reason, Fathers, Councils, Undermine Divine Faith, and Abuse Moral Honesty ; In the Second Part, Forty Malicious Calumnies and Forged Untruths Laid Open ; Besides Several Fanatical Principles Which Destroy All Church Discipline, and Oppose Christs Divine Authority. London: Printed by Henry Hills ..., 1688.

MLA (8th ed.) Citation

Sabran, Lewis. Dr. Sherlock's Preservative Considered: The First Part, and Its Defence, Proved to Contain Principles Which Destroy All Right Use of Reason, Fathers, Councils, Undermine Divine Faith, and Abuse Moral Honesty ; In the Second Part, Forty Malicious Calumnies and Forged Untruths Laid Open ; Besides Several Fanatical Principles Which Destroy All Church Discipline, and Oppose Christs Divine Authority. Printed by Henry Hills ..., 1688.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.