Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)

Issue 11.3 of the Review for Religious, 1952.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus
Format:	Online
Language:	eng
Created:	Saint Louis University Libraries Digitization Center 1952
Online Access:	http://cdm17321.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/rfr/id/214
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	sluoai_rfr-214
record_format	ojs
institution	Saint Louis University
collection	OJS
language	eng
format	Online
author	Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus
spellingShingle	Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)
author_facet	Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus
author_sort	Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus
title	Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)
title_short	Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)
title_full	Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)
title_fullStr	Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)
title_full_unstemmed	Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)
title_sort	review for religious - issue 11.3 (may 1952)
description	Issue 11.3 of the Review for Religious, 1952.
publisher	Saint Louis University Libraries Digitization Center
publishDate	1952
url	http://cdm17321.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/rfr/id/214
_version_	1797768348416606208
spelling	sluoai_rfr-214 Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952) Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus Jesuits -- Periodicals; Monasticism and religious orders -- Periodicals. Ellard ; Gallen ; Hardon Issue 11.3 of the Review for Religious, 1952. 1952-05-15 2012-05 PDF RfR.11.3.1952.pdf rfr-1950 BX2400 .R4 Copyright U.S. Central and Southern Province, Society of Jesus. Permission is hereby granted to copy and distribute individual articles for personal, classroom, or workshop use. Please credit Review for Religious and reference the volume, issue, and page number and cite Saint Louis University Libraries as the host of the digital collection. Saint Louis University Libraries Digitization Center text eng Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus A..M.D.G. Reviewfor Religious MAY 15, 1952 Newman: Defender of Mar~y ...... John A. Hardo~ Custody of-,the Senses " Evereff J. Mibach" The S°acred Heart ........ ~.. ~4;chaoIJ. Lap;e,re ¯ Quinquennial Directive, III ....... Joseph F. Gallen Questions and Answers Summer SesSions~ Book Reviews VOLUM~ XI NUMBER 3 RI::VI W FOR RI::LIGIOUS VOLUME XI MAY, 1952 NUMBER 3 CONTENTS CARDINAL NEWMAN, APOLOGIST OF OUR LADY-~ J~h~ A. Hardon, S.J ........ 113 SUMMER SESSIONS .................. 1 IGNATIANSPIRITUALITY Augustine G. Ellard, S.J ...... 125 CUSTODY OF THE SENSES--Everett J. Mibach, S.J ....... 1’~3 THE SACRED HEART: A THOUGHT FOR RELIGIOUS-- Michaei J. Lapierre, S.J ........ OUR CONTRIBUTORS ................. 150 THE QUINQUENNIAL REPORT: OBLIGATIONS AND DIREC-TIVES, III Joseph F. Gallen, S.J.. 151 TEN YEAR INDEX--NOW AVAILABLE .......... 158 UNIQUE SCHOLARSHIP ................ 158 PIUS XII ON THE RELIGIOUS LIFE ........... 158 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS-- 13. Restoration of Solemn Vows ......... ". . . 159 14. Dispensation from Eucharistic Fast .......... 160 15. Revenue from Ceded Property ............. 160 16. Is Ranching Permitted? .............. 161 17. Prescriptions for Privacy .............. 161 18. Obligation to Confess Doubtful Sins .......... 162 VOCATION PAMPHLETS ................. 162 BOOK REVIEWS-- The Mystical Evolution in the Development and Vitality of the Church; The Breviary Explained ................ 163 BOOK NOTICES ................... 165 BOOK ANNOUNCEMENTS ............... 167 REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS, May, 1952. Vol. XI, No. 3. Published bi-monthly: January, March, May, July, September, and November at the College Press, 606 Harrison Street, Topeka, Kansas, by St. Mary’s College, St. Marys, Kansas, with ecclesiastical approbation. Entered as second class matter January 15, 1942, at the Post Office, Topeka, Kansas, under the act of March 3, 1879. Editorial Board: Jerome Breunig, S.J.; Augustine G. Ellard, S.J.; Adam C. Ellis, S.J. ; Gerald Kelly, S.J. Copyright, 1952, by Adam C. Ellis, S.J. Permission is hereby granted for quota-tions of reasonable length, provided due credit be given this review and the author. Subscription price: 3 dollars a year; 50 cents a copy. Printed in U.’ S. A. Before writlncj to us, pleas~ consult notice on Inside back cover. ’ Cardinal Newman, :Apologist Our,La y, . Joh’n A. Hardon, S.J. IN THEIR formal prote~t in 1950 against the definition of Our Lady’s As, sumpt!on, the~Anglic~n bishops Of England declared,. "We profoundly-regret that the Roman ~Catholic Chm:ih has chssen .b~; this act to increase dogmatic differences in Christendom a’nd has thereby gravely injured the .growth of understand!ng be-tween Christians based on a common possession, of the fundamental .... truths of the Gospel." ¯ (London Times,. August 18, 19 51J.)... We may assume that the’Bis.hops of Y, otk and Can[erbur’y were sincere in m~aking-this decli~ration, but how should we estimate and deal with their attit&de of mind, which is so common among ,Chris-tians out’side the true Church? Why should, faith in Mgr}’, as one~ Prote.stant theologian phts’.it, be the "swordof separation", between .Catholic and non-Catholic Christianity? Fortu_nately we havean excellent guide ifi this matter in "Cardinal Newman, ~ho himself ~p~ssed through all the stages of-p)¢judi~e’ag’ainst Catholic devotion to.the Blessed Virgin !VI, ary, and finally became an outstan.ding de-fender. of her dignity against the attacks 6f.her enemies. " Newm, an’~ Anglican Deuotion to Ma~rtt ’ Newman became a Catholic in 1845, afte~ forty-fou~ years in the established Church of England. L.oqg before his conversion,’ however, 1~ was already devbted to the Blessed,Virgin Mary. Among the ~arly, influences in his life at Oxford .was Hurrel[ Froude who "taught me to look with admiration towards the Church of Rome. He fixed deep’ in me the idea of devotion to the Blessed.Virgin." Froude had "a high. seyerefidea of the intrinsic excellence of Virgin-ity: ¯ and be considered the Blessed. Virgin ’its great Pattern.~’ (A., 22, 23.) ~ - Througl~olat his Anglican. days, Newman often preached on the digni~y of.Christ’s Mother, stressing esl~ecially her transcendent. purity and nearness t6 God. "He never..tired of repeating that Christ was born of a’Virgin "pure and.spotless.’" To his mi,nd, it Was in-lThe key [t~ the references is: A. Apologia (1~47) : P. Pdrochial and Pia~n Serf mons, II (1~18); L.’P.. "Letter to,Pusey" in Di~culties o~-Anglicans (1907). 3OHN’A. HARDON Review [or Religious conkeivable that the only.-beg~tten Son of God should have come.. into the World’ as other men. "The thought may not be suffered that He,should have been the son of shame and guilt: He came by a new ~nd living way: He selected and purified a tabernacle for Himself. becomlng the immaculate seed of the woman, forming His body miraculously from the substance of the.Virgin Mary" (P., 31). On the Feast of the Annunciation in 1832. he preached a sermon on Mary’s sanctity in which he was accused of teaching ~he Immacu-late Conception.."That whicti % born of the flesh," he said, "is flesh." So that no one can bring what is clean from what is un-clean. In view of her prospective digr~ity-as the Mother of Christ, Mary was endowed Withgifts of holiness that are be~.ond descrip-tion. "What must have been the transcendent purity of h’erwhom the Creator Spirit. condescended to overshadow with His miraculous presence .... This contemplation runs to a higher subje~t, did we dare follow it: for what, think you, was the sanctified humanstate of that human nature of which God.formed His sinless Son?" (P., 132.) Newman would not draw the illation, but his audience did. Later in life he referred tot this sermon as a witness to his abiding affection f~r the Blessed Virgin"Mary. "I hid a true devotion to the gl~ssed ViFgin.". he says, speaking of his Oxford. days, "in whose college I lived, whose Altar I served, and whose Immaculate Purity I had in one of my earliest printed sermons made much of"-(A.. 149). Early Prejudices against "’Mariotatr{ ’: Against this inspiring background, we are surprised to find cer~ tain blindspotsand inconsistencies in Newman’s Anglican devotion to the Virgin Mother. Until a few years before his conversion, he hesitated to call Mary the Mother of God. Convinced, it seems, of the fact of her divine maternity, he could not bring.himself to give her this exalted title. The Son of God. he preached, "came into this World, not in the clouds but born of a woman; He the Son of Mary, and she (if it may be said)"the Mother of God" (P., 32). gome of Newman’s critics have remarked on the length of time he spent in coming to a d~cision about entering the Roman Church. Ten, fifteen years before his conversi6n he’ spoke of "the high gifts and strong claims of the ChUrch of.Romd on. our admiration, rever-ence, love and gratitude." He wbuld ask himself how a non-Catholic "can withstand her attractiveness, how he can "refrain from being melted into tendernessand rushing into commun’ion" with her, on Ma~ , 1.957. " OUR LADY, S DEFENDER beholding the Church’s bea~;..,of doctrine and vindication of he~ Newman answers for himself. On the one hand he. found the Roman Church most attractive in her doctrine an’d ritual; on the o~ber hand be resisted her advances. "My feeling," he .confessed, "was something like that of a man who is obliged in a court of jus-tice’to bear Witness against a f~iend" (A., 50). There was a con-flict between "reason and affection," between what be thought hi~ reason told him against the errors of Rome, and what his si3ontane-ous Christian affections loved inRoman Catholicism. Now the strange fact i~i~hal~ Newman. reduced all his Anglican objections ~o the Chtlrch of Rbme’tb o,rie b~t~ic element in her system, namely, her devotion to" the saints and partictilarly to the Mother of God. "Writing as.a Catholic, he.says, "I thought¯ the essence of her (the Roman Church’s) offence to consist in the h0nours which she paid to the Blessed Virgin and the saints, ,and the more I grew in devotion, both to the saints and to our L~dy, the more impatient I was at the Roman.pr~tctices, as if those glorified creations Of God ~nust be severely shocked, if pain could be theirs, at the undue ven-eration of which they were the objects". (A., 48). One¯day, as an Anglican. he summarized the pros and cons for becoming a Catholic. Point six ~n a series of nine is clear: "I could not go to Rome. while she suffered honours to be paid to.~he Bl~ssed Virgin and the Saints which I thought in my ¯conscience to be incom-i~ atible with the Supreme, Incommunicable Glory of the One In-finite and Ete’rnal" which belong solely to God-(A:, 134). Four years before his conve?sion, in 1841, he received an appeal from a zealous Catholic layman urging him not to hesitate any longer about submittingto Rome, when so little doctrinal difference separated the Anglicans from the true Church. Newman replied in a long letter, in which he said. "I fear I am .going to pain you by telling you, that you consider the approaches in ’doctrine on our part towards you closer than they really are: I cannot help repeating what I have many tim~s said in print that your ~ervices and ,devo-tions to St. Mary in matter of fact do rfiost deeply pain me. I am or~ly stat~rig it as a fact." (A.. 173.) A year later. Newman wrote to Dr. Russ~ll to thank him for an English translation of St.,.Alphonsus L. iguori’s sermons.. Dr. Rus-sell. who was president of Mayno.oth in Dublin. had. says Newman, "perhaps more todo with my conversion than anyone else." In ,the 115 ,. JOHN A. I~ARDON Ret~idW f6"r l~tter, NeWman asked his friend whether anything had been left out in the transla’tion of Liguori’~ sermons, and was, tg.ld that there had been omissions in One sermon about’the Blessed Virgin. This small detail appears to have been,the turning,point in Newmail’s apl~roach, to the .Church. D’escribing ivin the Apologia he says, "It must be "observed. ihat the writings of St. Alfonio,~is I knew-them by the extracts commonly mad~~ fror~ them. prejudiced me as much agaifi~t~ ’the Roman Church a~ anything, el;e, on accou, nt of what was called tl~eig .’Mariol.atry.’.’’ But, and this i~ significant, ~’there is nothing of the kind in this book" which Russell had sent hirn2 "This omis-sion in.the.case of a book intended for Catholics. at le~t showed that such passages as are fdund in the works of Italian authois were not acceptable to every part of ,the Catholic world. S~ch de~r~tid~al. ~ manifestations in honour of our L~dyhad be~n .my great crux as re- "~ ~ards ~atholicism." (A.,..176.) Once he became cdnvinced that the, Roman Church was willing to d~mngu)sh between faith arid external piety in devotion to Mary,. and to recog,nize that piety,-unlike fa’ith, canbe different for dlfferent people, his entrance, into the Church was only a matter of time. e ’letter-to Dr. Russell was sent iri November. 1842, and in February of the following year. Newman made a formal public retraction "of all the hard things which I had said.against the Church of Rome" (A., .1,81). - - _. In Defehse of Mar~’s Honor . ¯ A~ter his cdnversion. Newman drew fre~luent!y on his own ex: ¯ perience tohelp remove ~he obstacles which 6thers had to face in their" journe~y to" Rom~---notably the (ommon prejudice against so-called Catholic excesses in devotion to the Blessed Virgin. However, for the most part this was 0nly private and persbnal, assistance to pros-pec~ ive converts or in answer ,to specific"charges made by ir~dividual Protestant~,. Not until 1865~ did he have.an opportunity to defe’nd :l~Iary’s honor and .to vindicate~the Roman piety.in her.regard in a way.that was to win for.him the gratitude 6f generations 6f Ehglish-speaking Catholics. In 1865 his old f’riend Edward Pus£y published.~he Eireni~on, im which he promised a peaceful settlement of the differences between Canterbury ~ind Rome, if only Rome Would meet certain conditions’ .which’he recommended. One of the major obstacles which had ’td ¯ be removed in .~he. interest of re-ufiion was the Roman Church’s cultus~f th~ Mother of God. "I believeY he said, "the system jn 116 May, 195’2" . Ouk LADY’S DEFENDER regard to the Blessed Virgin iLthe.chief hindiance~to ~e-union." Of all the objecti, ons which the.average ]~gli~hmanhas against Rome. "the vast system as to the:Blessed:Virgin ¯ . to all of us has been the, special, ciuxof the Roma~a system." (Eirenicon, 101.) Pus’ey’ opposed the ~urrent.Catholic devotion to the Blessed Vir-gin on two scores: he claimed it was simply excessive, and it lacked a solid’foundation.in Cfiristian tradition. He singled out fo.5~special censure the dogma°.of the Immaculate Conception Which had just" been definedeleven’years,before. This was the quintessence of papal presumption~ in.defining as revealed doctrine what only a handfu’l of zealots had originally believed to be true. Puse)~’s main diffictilty, however was similar to what Newman’s hhd been, that Catholic piety towards Mary was derogating.from -the h0northat was rightly du~ to her Son. St~itements like "God does not will to give anything except through the Blessed Viigin," and "He has pl~aced her between Christ and the Church" were unin-telligible, he thought, if Christ is. the sol~ Mediator between God.and man. -Granted that."the’devotion of the peo’ple to the Blessed Vir-gin outruns the judgment of the priestL" but what "if the whole weight of Papal authority is added to the popular doctrines, and the people a.re bidden . . . to bestill more devoted to the Ble’~sed Virgin ¯ . . one sees not ~here there shall,be any pause or bound short 6f thal~ bold conceptioln that ’every prayer, both of individuals and of th~ Church. should b~ addressed to St. Mary.~ ""(Eir~ni~o.n, i86~, 187.) Newman’s answer to Pusey, while called a Letter, extends tO 170 pages~in Longmans’ edition. Thebody of the letter.fails into .three parts, each dealing with a separate charge made by Pusey. has been justly called a "inaste.rpiece of Marian literature," which-deserves to be better known not on~ly as a revelation of Newman’s 6wn love for Our~Lady, but.as a source book. of apologetics to.de-fend our Catholic devotion to the Mother of God. " Marian Doctri;~e not Marian Devotion "I begin," .say~s Newman, "l~y making a distinction--the dis-tinction between faith and. devotiom" By faith.in the Blessed Vir-g~ n he means all that Catholics~believe has be~n revealed to us about the Mother of God. By. devotion he .mean~ such’religious honors and expiessions of affection as follow f~m the faith.’ "Faith and ’ dev6tion are as distinct in fact as they are in idea. We cannot. in-deed. be de~out without faith, but we may believe with6ut feeling 117 JOHN A. HARDON Reaiew for Religious devotion." .-Against the Protestant Objection that Catholic doctrine about Mary has grown by adcretion over the centuries, Newman an.2 ¯ swers that what has grow.n is subjective de;cotion, that is, r~aliza, tion and expression of faith, but not ttJe faith itself. And again, in detrain countries Catholics are accused of makin’g almost a goddess of the Madonna, while elsewhere their piety is mo~e restrained. The same distinction applies: without defer~ding genuine¯ excesses, it is still true t.hat some Catholics are more affectionate and expressive in their devotions than others, but the doctrine about Mary’is always the same. ~ "This distinction," for Newman, "is forcibly brought home to a convert as a peculiarity Of the Catholic religion, on his first intro-duction to its worship. The fiii.th is e~erywhere the same, bul~ a large liberty is "accorded to private judgment and inclination, as regards matters of devotion .... No one interferes with his neighbor: agree-ing, as it. were, to differ, they pursue independently a common end, ,~lnd by paths, distinct but converging, present themselves before God." (L.. P., 28’). Starting from this distinction, Newman pr6ceeds to explai’n. some of the fundamental doctrines which" Catholics ~hold regarding the Blessed Virgin. Her Immaculate Conception, for ,example, is a stumbling block to non-Catholics because they do not knob¢ what we mean by original ~in. "Odr doctrine of original sin is not the same as the Protestant. We with the Fathers think of it as some-thing negative, Protestants a~ something posit!ve."’ . They.hold that ’~’it is a disease, a radical.change of nature, an.active poison internally ¯ corrupting the soul, infecting its primary elements, and disorganizing it; and they fanc’y we ascribe a different nature, from ours to the Blessed Virgin, different from that of her parents, and from that of fallen Adam~" .We hold nothing of the kind. "We consider that. in Adam she died as others; that she was included, together with the whoIe race, in Adam’s sentence, . .but we. deny that she had original sin; for by original si’n we mean something negative, the deprivation of tfiat supernatural unmerited grace .which Adam and Eve had on their first formation." Catholic belief .ir~ the’Immacula’te C~nception is only a natural ~orollary to the more fundamental truth’ of the Divine Maternity. Newman is a specialist here, tracing the clear lines of tradition from the earliest Fathers of the Church. "To the Greeks she was Theoto-kos, to the Lati~as Deipara, to us the Mother of God. Intoone para-graph he crowds the testimony of the. ages on the elemental dignity 118 JOHN. A. HARDON - - Reuieu~ fo~" Religiou* of the Virgin Mary.°.. "our:Go~’ Was carried in the womb of Mary," says Ignatius who was martyred A.D:-106. "The Maker of all," says Amphylochius, "is born of a.Virgin.’.’ "God dwelt in a womb," says Proclus. Cassian says, "Mary bore her Author." "~The E;~’er-lasting," says Ambrose, "came into the. Virgin.’ .... He" is’ made in thee," }ays St. Augustine. "Wh6 made thee~" (L. P., 47,~ 65.) On the practical side, !Newman deals With the question of Mary’s intercessory power which, he explains, follows "from two basic truths: first that it is good a~ad useful to invoke the saints, and sec-ondly that the Blessed Virgin is singu, larly dear to her Son. The first may be assumed among believing Christians, but the second notso obviods. ¯ Granting tfiat prayer of intercession is "a first prin- .ciple of the Church’s life. it is certain again that the vital fofce’ of .that intercession~, as an availing l~ower, is sanctity..The words of the man born blind speak the common-sense of nature: ’If any man be a-worshiPper.of God, him He heareth.’ " What thin must be the position Of the Blessed Virgin before the throne of God? . If the Lord was willing t$ spare Sodom and Gomorrha in answer to Abra-ham’s piayer, if the prayer of Job for his friends saved them from the anger of God, if Elias b~.his prayer Shut and opened the hea-v~n~, if Jeremias, Moses, and Samuel were great mediators between God and His people, ."what offence is it to affirm the like of her..who was not merely," as Abraham,. Moses, and Elias, "the friend, but was the very Mother of God." (L. P., 71,’72.) Doctrine about Mary °Alfect~ed by Devotion Having laid the doctrinal foundhtion for Mariah piety, Newman examines the charges made by Pusey that Catbollc devotion tO the Blessed.Vi~gin i~ exc~siy~ and out of proportion.to its dogmatic basis. This accusation would be. justified only if man were all intel-lect and his religi6n were only intellectual. But "religion acts on the affections." And "who is to hinder these, when once roused, from. gathering in their strength and running wild? Of all passions; love is themost unmanageable; nay more,, I would not give:much for that ¯ -love which is never extravagant, which always .observes theproprie-ties, and can move about in perfect good taste, under all circum-stances. What motbeg, what husband or wife, what youth or maiden in love, but says a thousand foolish tbifigs, in the way of endear-ment, which the. s~eaker wouldI be sorry for strangers to hear, ye~ they ~re not on that account unWelcome’to .the parties to whom they are addressed " (L. P., 79, 80.)! \ i 119 JOHN A. HARDON Ret~ieto for Religious "Let me _apply’ what ~ have been saying to the teaching of., the Church on the" subject of the Blessed Virgin .... When once we haste mastered the idea that Marry bore. suckled, and handled the Eternal in th, e fo~m of a child, wh~t limit is conceivable to the rush and flood ,of thoughts wfiich0such a doctrine involves?¯ What.awe and ~urprise :must attend upqn th~.knoWledge tha’t a creature has. been brought :so’dose to the Divine Essence? "It was the creation of a new idea and of. a new sympathy, ofa new faith and worship, when the holy Apostles announced that God had become inc~irnate; then a supreme love and devotion ~ to Him became possible, which see~ed hopeless before¯ that revelation. ,.This was the first consequence of their teaching. But besides this,’a second range of though}s ~vas opened on mankind, unknown before, and unlike any other, as soori as it was understood }hat that Incarnate God had a mother." (L. P., 83.) Mariolatry is a familiar "reproach on the lips of Protestantsand of Newman himself before his conversion¯ But it is based on a libel.¯ The two ideals of Christ as Mediator and of Mary as mediatrix are perfectly distinct in the minds of Catholics, and there i~" no inter-ference,. between them,. -"He is God m~de low, she is woman inade high...-.When~he became man, He brought home td us His incom-mun’icable attributes with a distinctness which pr~cl~des th~ possi-bilit~ r of lowering Him me’rely by~ Our exalting a creature. He alone has an entrance-into our sou/, reads our secret th.oughts, ~pe~aks to our" heart, applies~ to us ~piritual pardon and strength .... Mary is only our, Mother by" divine appointment, given us from the Cro~s: her presence is abgve,,not on earth; her office is external, not within us. Her power is indirect. It is her prayers that av, ail, and her pray-e’rs a~:~ effectual by the tiat of Him Who i~ our all in all." .It is ~rue that Mary occupi~s.a center in Catholic devotion and" worship, but that center is infi.nitely removed from divinity. "~f we placed our Lad~; inthat centre,~ we should only be, dragging Him from His throne, and making Him an Arian kind of God, that is. no God at all." q-?ben followsa ~errible¯ indictment .~gainst his°own contemporaries and those modern Protestants--who accuse Catholics of adoring the Virgin Mother. "He who charges uL" says Newman ~ "’with making Mary a divinity, is thereby denying the divinity of desus. S~ch a man does not know what divinity is." ,(L. P.. 83- 85.) Catholic Excesses In thee final part of his lettek. Newman han"dles the accusation 120 ,May, 1952 ... OUR LADY’S DEFENDER that devotion to,Mary obscures the dev6tion to Christ. Pro, testants . say that "our ’devotions to-our Lady must" necessarily throw our Lord,into the shade: and there, by relieve themselves of a great deal of trouble.. Tl~en they catch at. anystray fact which countenances or. .seems to countenanee,their prejt~°dices. Now I say. plainly, I Tillnever defend or screen any one from’ you jus~ r~buke who, through false devotion to Mary, forgets~l~us. ~But I should like the fact to be ,. proved first, I cannot .h~sti.l.y. ~dmit it. ° There is this b~oad fact the o, ther way: --that if we lo0k.~hrough Europe, we shall find, on ~l~e.. ¯ whole, that just those nations and countries have lost their faith in the divinity of ChriSt. 9¢hb 15~ve given up devotioia to His Mother, .and that those on t~e other .hand. who had been foremost .in her honour, hav~ re’tained their brtl~odoxy. Contrast, for instance, the Calvinist~ With ~l~e Greeks, orFrance w~th the North~ of,Germany, or the Protestant ~nd Cath~li6’commumons in-Ireland. ...In’ the- Catholic Church M~ry has shown herself, not the rival, but the min-ister 6f her Son: she has prbtect~d Him. as in His infancyl,soino the whole h~story of theRehg~on. (L. P., 92, 93.) , " ¯ Non-Catholics make much of the fact that Catholic .churches are filled with statues and p~ctures of the Blessed Virgin, that there are so many prayer~ in her honor, that she is given so import_ant a place in-the liturgy. .Newman answers with t.w_o distinctions: first Jris not .true that Mary enjoys rile center of" devotion in..th~ liturgy, and secqndly~ Protestants judge Catholics by themselves when they as-sume that v~hat, should 15e idolatrous ~ or dishonorable, to Christ among the~nselves is also th~ ~ame among Catholics. Thus "when stranger’s ar~ so unfa~cora.bly impr(ssed with us, because they see’Im-ages of our Lady in our,,. Churches and crowds floc.king aboht her, .. they forget that there "is a Pres~nce within the sacred walls infini’te-ly more awft~l, which claims_ ahd obtains~from us a worsh!p tran-scendently different from any devotion.~’we pay toher. That devotion. might, indeed, tend to’idoiatry, if it were encouraged in Protestant churches, where ~here is nothing higher than it to attract the wor-shipper; but. all the images that a Catholic church ever contained, all’ the Crucifixes at its Altars brought together, do not so affect its fie.- quenters,, as the lamp which betokens the p.resence or absence there ol ~the Blessed Sacramer~t." "’The Mass againconveys .tous the same lesson of the sovereignty of the Incarnate Son: it is a return to Calvary, and Mary is scarcely named in it.’" In the same way, Hoiy Commianion, "which is, give~ in the 121 JOHN A, HARDON Review for Religious mor_ning, is a solemn unequivocal act of faith in the Incarnate God, if any be such; arid the most grakious admonitions, did we need one. of Hissovereign and sole right to-possess us. I knew a lady, who on her. deathbed was Visited by an excellent Prote}tant. frieni:l... The latter, with grea~ tenderness for her soul’s welfare, asked her Whether herprayers to the Blessed Virgin did not at that awful hour, lead tb forgetfulness of her Sa¢iour. ’Forget Him?’ she replied, ’Why. He was just now here.’ She had been keceiv!ng Him in communion." (L. P., 95, 96.) Newman had one last and the most difficult rebuttal to make. Pusey had drawn up a list of quotations from various Catholic writers who speak of the Blessed Virgin in terms of extravagant ~a~ection. But this is an unfaircriticism. "Some of your authors." Newman admits. "are Saints: all. I supp6se, are spiiitual writers and holy men: but the majority are of no great celebrity,: even if they bare any kind of ~¢eight. Suarez has no-business among them at all, for, when he says that no one is saved without the Blessed Virgin, he is speaking not of devotion to her. but of. her intercession. ’The greatest nam~ is St. Alfonso Liguori: but it never surprises me to read anything extraordinary in the devotions of a saint." Howeyer. when faced directly with Pusey’s quotations.Newman confesses, "I will frankly say that when I read them in your volume, they affected me with grief and almost with angei: for they seemed to ascrib~ to the Blessed Virgin-a power of searching the re’ins and hearts, which is the attribute of God alone: and I said to myself. how can we any longer prove our Lord’s divinity from Scripture, if those cardinal passages which invest Him wiih divine prerogatives; after all invest Him with.nothing beyond what His Mother shares with Him? -And how again, is there anything of incommunicable greatness in His death and passion, if He who was alone in the gar-den, alone upon the cross, alone in .the resurrection, after all is not alone, but shared His ~olitary work with His Blessed Mother. And then again, if I hate those perverse sayings so much, how much more must she. in proportion to, her love of Him? and how do we show our love for bet, by wounding her in the very apple of her e.ye? This I felt and feel: but then on the other band I have to observe that these strange words after all are but few in number: that most of them exemplify the difficulty of determining the exact point where tri~th passes into. error, and that they are allowable in orie sense or connec-tion, though false in another. .Thus to say that .pgayeg (~nd. the 122 Mag, ,1952 OUK LADY’S’D~FENDER ¯ Blessed ~ Virgin’s prayer) is omnipotent, .is a harsh expression, in every-day prose; but, if it i~ explained’:to mean that there is nothing whi_ch~prayer may not 0bta~in from God, it is nothing else than th’e very promise made us in Scrlpture. ’. (L-. P., 103, 104.) Pusey’s worst accusatlqn was that according to c~rtain Catholic writers devotion to the Blessed Virgin’ is necessary for salvation. Newman challenges this statement, "by Whom is it saidthat to pray to our Lady and the SaintsI is necessary to salvation? The proposi-tion of St. Alfonso ig, th~at ’God gives no grace except through Mary, that is through her intercession. But-intercession is one (hing, devotion another." If devotion to the Blessed Virgin were nece~sa[y, then "’no Protestant could l~e saved: if it wereso, there would be -grave; reason for doubting of the salvation of St. Chrykostom or St. Athanasius, or of the ~rimitive Martyrs; nay, I should like to know whether St. Augustine, in all his voluminous writings, in-vokes her once. Our Lord ~tied for those he~ith~n Who did not know Him; and His Mother intercedes for those Christians who do not know bet: andshe intercedeshccording to His will, and, when He wills to sav~ a particular sloul, she at once prays for it. I say, He wills indeed ~ccording to heI, r. prayer, but then she prays according to Hisw ~i"ll .". (L. "P., 105, 106.) " .Newman s Apologetic Method It no exaggeration to say that Newman’s Letter to Pusey is’the outstanding work of’ Marla, n apologetics written m Enghsh. ~n the ¯ past century. Its stholarship and transparent honesty made it wel-come to those outside the Church. even to Pusey, as he admitted in a letter to Newman. But morI-e important, it gave to Catholics a pro-found analysis of the prinCiples on which their devotion to the Mother of God should be l~as~d. It alsg"gave them an object lesson in the method they should follow in dealing with non-Catholic Christians, with a ~iew to conver. nng them to’the true faith. The method must be a consummate respect for the non-Catholic’s sin-cerity, and should recognize that ¯after all ,is s~id and done, faith is a free gift of God to be obtained in answer to humble prayer. Thus in the beginning I ¯ ¯ of his letter, Newman makes ~t clear that he considers the opposition, to. be m good faith. I know, he says, "the joy ~it would give ~hosle conscientious men [Pusey .and/his lol-iow~ rs] to be one with ourlselves. I know how.their hearts spring up with a spontaneous tran what yearning .is I~heirs aft~ ;port at the very thought of union;~ and r that great privilege, which they have 123 SUMMER SESSIONS - not, .communio.n with th~ see of Peter, and.its present, pa.st ~nd fu-ture,."’ (L. P., 3.) But~ after all the clafms of ~onscience are settled by reason and argumentati6n, the most important thing is still n~eded. And so in tfi~’ last paragraph of his letter Newman c6dclud~s’with a prayer. He asks Go~l to."firing us’all togethkr in unity .... to destroy all bitterness on your side and ours...to quench all jealous, sour. proud, fierce an-tago, nism on’our side: and-to dissipate all captious, carping, fastidious ¯ refinements of reasoning on ~’ours.". And finally, "May that bright and gentle L~idy, the Blessed Virgin Mary, overcome you with her ¯ sw, eetness, and revenge herself on.her foes by interceding effectually fo~ their conversion." (L. P.,. 118..) ,.,S ummer Sessions The Department of Religious Education, ,Fordham University, New york, offers gradu.ate courses in the following, branches of"the-ol6gy during the 1952 Summer SeSsion: Sanctifying Grace-by Rev. Elmer O’Brien, S.~3. (Toronto) : the sacraments 6f Penance and Extreme" Unction by Rev. Paul Palmer S.d. (Toronto); Com-m~ andmefits I-IV by R~v. doseph Duhamel. S."3. (Woodstock Col-lege) : Church History by Dr. Donnelly (Fordham) : and Methods of Teaching Religion in High School l~y, Rev. ,l~hn F. Dwyer, S.,I. (Fordham). Each course carries two points of c~edit. Concurrently with the Sfimmer Session. the Graduate School and the School of Education will jointly conduct a FRENCH INSTITUTE FOR SISTERS exclu~iyely. 06 duly 21 and 22, the Division of. Educational Psy-chology, Meagur~ments and Guidance will sponsor its second annual two-davy INSTITUTE ON RELIGIOUS AND SACERDOTAL VOCATIONS. This Institute. will be .held-for the diocesan: a.nd regular clergy, for ¯ ~eligious brbthers and sisters. Its purpose will be to discuss the prol~lems involved in recognizing, encouraging ~ind fostering voca-. tions to the diocesan priesthood and to the religious.. "The Summer Session extend~ from duly 7th to August 14th. , For further infor-mation, address the executive .secretary of the Sfimmei Session, F6rdham University, New York, 58, New York. [Additibnal announcemen~s dr’summer sessions are given in~ the March number. pages 95-96. A note for deans of summer schools is given in the ,January -num-ber, page 56. ] ’124 Ignat:ian Spirit:u, li y Augustine G. Ellard. \| ~NATIAN spirituality is c~iae of.the modern" schools. It acknowl- ~ ]edges itk junior status,¯ u ir~heritance that the oldeafn, ds~.~dlhadolo’lys aonfd’ ,C gartahtoefliucl lsyp aircict.euia~lt s’,t rtahdei rtiiodnh have put at its disposal Father Eludon, in his St. Iqi~atius. of Loyola, devote~ the whole of ch~ipte, r twelve to showing thal~ just .w.hen he was wo_rk[ng out his own ideas and ideal~ St; Ign.atius °was u’nd.er’t.he i~nfluenc~ of a rattier large number of different currents’of spirituality. The two principal instruments of his conversion were the Life of Cbri’st by Ludolph-~of Saxony and the Liues of the Saints by Jac0p? de V’oragine. The’ former wa~a Carthusian, and the latter a’Do-mini~ an. Ignatius of(eia thought: "St. Dominic did this., St. FranciSo. that: shc~uld not I also do as they?" fiis a matter of fact, for a time, he thought of becominga Carthusian. His favorite book through-out life was Thomas ~l Kempis: thus he put himself in debt to the Devotlo M~derna" that the B’roth~ers of’ the Common Life arid the monks of Wi’ndesheim were. propagating. Th~se three w~rks were majbr forces in.his formation. In addition to these he came under the personal’influence of the Ber~e,dictines at Montserrat, of the Do-minicans with whom he.lived at Manresa, of’th~ Franci~cans, of the Hieronymites, of the C, ister~cians, and probably of others ~llso. "It is the,opinion of at least one man who has made a very Speciai study"bf Igna’tian spirituality, "namely Boeminghaus. that Ignatius ’fused two streams of spirituality’which before him had come down in more or less p~irallel lines .(B,oeminghaus, Die Aszese der "lgnatia~- ischen EScercitien. 10-34). These traditions were those typified by Thomas ~ Kempis and St. Fraficis of Assisi. ]During tl~e later years of ~tbe Middle Ages the~scbool of spirituality ~hat was most fresh and vigqrous was that of the Cbristi~in Renaissance, just referred to under ¯ the Latin name:.tbat it u~ually goes by, n~mel]z, "Dev,0tio Moderna " It m~i~ked a reaction ¯against "excessive speculation--in piety and stressed the supreme importance of beihg 2or.dctical in one’s religious life. " In particular, it tended to put more method into the spiritual" life arid especia.lly into the mental pray~r that should animate and vivify it." In a word, one may ~ay that its asceticism was that which we are’ all familiar with from the Imitation of Christ. The second stream was the Franciscan. ’It t.aught ~i0uh. souls to .... 125 t AUGUSTINE G. ELLARD Review for .Reliyious take the~Gospel literally, to seek evangelical simplicity and poverty, to look to qesus in His ,human nature as He really existed in time and place, to respond to Him as a person" with love and dev6tion, to keep unitedowith Him as intimately as possible, and finally¯ to live and Work with Him. Hence vitality, enthusiasm, and personal response characterize it, ’as practical method¯ add earnestness marked the other. Boeminghaus sums u’p his idea in suggesting that, to a gr~it extent, St. Ignatius took his method from the Christian Renaissance group and the content of his system from the Eranciscan tradition, and then united them in his own original way. I.n these pages Ignatian spirituality is taken to include not only the teachin~ of St. Ignatius himself, but also that ofhis order. For the saint’s o(vn doctrine the priinary written sources are, besides.his Spiritual Exercises and the Constitutions o~ the.Societal of Jesus, his Spiritu’al JoUrnal and some of his letters. Certain letters are very important and do not always get the attention they deserve by. those who profess to :present his doctrine, especially on mental prayer. Some of the letters, too, are equivalent to liitle didactic tre;itis~s; examples ~ire the.celebrated Epistle on Obedience and the letter on perfection, to the students of the Society at Coimbra (May 7, 1547). The spiritual teaching of the Jesuits is to be found partly in certain official documents, for instance,, letters of the Fathers General, and principally in the numerous published works of Jesuit ascetical and mystical authors. Moreover, Ignatian spirituality is Understood to comprise both that according to which Jeguits themselves try to live, including a certain conception of the ~eligious life, of the ~’ows, and .especially of obedience, and also that which tb?y propose for others who accept their instruction. Of course, it ~s not implied in presenting Jesuit ideals that all Jesuits fully realize them. I, BASIC IDEAS The fundfimental element in any school of spirituality is the theory or set of ideas underlying it and giving it life" and direction. There must be some definite conception, for example, of God, of Christ, of human nature, and of the world. Different initial views on these fundamental realities or their relations necessarily give rise to different attitudes of will and divergent practical principles¯ St. Ignatius’s mentality was not at all theoretical. .Hence the genera.1 intellectual outlook in his system is simple and concrete¯ It is 126 May, 1952 IGNATIAN SPIRITUALITY ¯ decidedly, akin to that of the Synoptic Gospels rather than to St. John or St. Paul. It is no~ learned o~-theological, like, for instance, that of the Dominican Fathers or of the French Oratory.. God is conceived, mostly as’a great and good king, as a grand monarch on the divine scale. It is emphasized esp.ecia]]y that He is the creator and hence the so~’ereign lord of all. St. Ignatius liked to refer to God as "His Divine Majesty," or "~he Suprem~ Goodness." Among the divine attributes libe.rality is often, singled out for men-tion. God is not thought of as "All in ~all". or as "Prime Mover" or as "the Divine Spouse." Christ, the God-man, is so rich in various aspects that no ,one ~p~erson or group of Hi~ disciples could exhausl them all. Hence different schools of spirituality "emphasize different phases Of the great reality that He i~. One. c6uld consider Him as an adorable divine king sitting at.tl~e righ~t hand of the Fathe.r, surrounded by a heavenly court of angels arid saints, and receiving the homage of prayer and work from devout,men ’on earth. Another could con-centrate attention and affectibn above all on the scenes of the crib and the cross. A third, utilizing the concepts of theology, could make mt~ch of the Word.Incarnate. St. Ignatius sees Christ mostly as the. son of the divine King,and a king Himself, but with a king-- dom still to be conquered. He is a crusading king, at the head of his army, announcing, his intentions, and inviting men to qolur~teer for service. T.he pecu, liar temper of a school may depend much on how it conceives human nature. To cite"an historical’ example.: ancient Alexandrine spirituality took intelligence rather than any other fac-ulty to be the great thing about man and acco{dingly it stressed the place of contemplation in the perfect life. The modernFrench School (Cardinal de B~rulle) is noted for its pessimistic" (onception of human nature and the effects upon it of original sin. St. Ignatius is characterized in this mat.te~ by a certain optimism and voluntarism. Human natuie is indeed sor~ethirig that needs chastening and. training, but basically it is good and to be dev~loped and put to work ¯ in the cause of Christ. If all creatures have their value, a Fortiori humannature has; in fact man is the end and purpose of all other things. Bodily ’strength is not to be diminished by indiscreet aus-terities, but ~o be brought under control and made effective for the service of God. The voluntarism of St. Ignatius .is abundantly illustrated throughout the Exercises; he never ceases to refer’to "what I wish." 127 AUGUSTINE G. ELLARD Rebiew [or R~ligious ¯ The Ignatian view of the world, too, is°rather distinctive. Un-like many ascetics of old he did not look upon it °as something’ evil to be fled from and shhnned.as much as possible.. Nor like St. Ber-nard" did he consider it better to avoid creatures than~ to use them. He did not share St. Francis’s tender sentiment toward lowly¯ crea-tures as brothe~s¯ and sisters. St. Bonaventure’~ and many holy t - men of the Mi~tdle Ages stressed the fact that all things are likenessesof~ God’and should be looked upon as enlightening us about Him and attracting us to Him. St. Ignatius is more utilitarian and practical. For him everything in creation is a means tO help men to work out .their d~stiny; everything is to’ be rega.,rded and treated solely with’. ~" reference to that purpose. , . . .- ~,~ Co[responding to the ideas that one conceives of God and of.m~ will be ond’s ideal of pedec[ion, tha’t is, what one takes tobe the . completely right relation between God and man. ,Of course, the ’ggod disciple.of St. Ignatius ~uld be entirely submissiv~ to his Cre-ator and Supreme Lord. He would make God’s ends-’his own and seek to,achieve them by the means that God prefers. .To the divine libe?ality he also .rdsponds with magnanimous liberality. Enrolled in the apostolic campaigh ~ith Christ, he endeavors to agsociate him-self as closely as possible with hik great leader, to work with Him as effedtiv~ly as~ossible, and to imitate Him in all respects, but espe- "cially in b~aring pdverty and~humifiation nobly. Thus in_ every-thing he strik, es to love and serve the Divine Majesty. He conforms his will altogether to that of God. "What I wish", becomes pre-cisely whatGod wishes. ~ II. LEADING PRINCIPLES " Logically and fiaturally the basic ideas of a system of spirituality, . "in themselves more or less theoretical, give rise to practical principles indicating the appropriate action that should follow. I. The Divine Purpose,~ arid Plan The first and supremeprinciple of Ignatian asceticism, is oto seek the e~d. for which God created one. "Man is created to praise, rever-ence, and serve God our Lord, and by thi~ means’to’sa+e his soul": ~the "First Principle’ and Foundation" in the Spiritual. Exercises (23) .1 ’ ~Quotations from" the .Exercises ~re from Loui~ ~J. Puhl’s’translation; the figure~ re-fer to’ the paragraph enumeration introduced by the editors of the critical edition, Madrid, 1 ~ 19. ~ 28 IGNATIAN SPIRITUALITY As God begins,’ ~nd we may also add, ends, wi~h a certain definite purpose, so does St. Ignatius, and so too will hi~ disciple. In fact, man is invited to intend just what:"God intends. Between God and man there are to be no cross-purposes. .Moreover and especi,ally, one. should seek, not a .part of what God intends, but all df it, and to work it out always by using, precisely the means and method pre-ferred t~y God: what is’this but to have just the same iglan as God? Praising and referencing God is substantially, the same as.glori-fying Him. -Striving for the greater glory of God, ."Ad majorem Dei. gloriarff," is very .probably. ~vhht th~ name of Ignatius. is most a’pt ~o .suggest to most people who .have some knowledge of him. It is,well known that whenever SI~. Ignatius wrote or dictated he was cofistantly referring to the glory of God[. In the little book of the Exercises the glory or praise of God is p_roposed as.the end no less than thirty-three times..In the C~nstituffons of ttie Society the ref-efence 6ccurs about-135 times in ~2i47 .pages (the" edition of 1937: so Lawlor, "Doctrine of Grace in the Spiritual Exercises’" THEO-LOGICAL STUDIES, 1942, 524). Nor Was the expression always on his lip.s only. Seeking to make God be’tter known and loved" was ever in his thoughts .and aspirations and supremely strong and do}ni-nant among them.- Hence explicit and uninterruptedaiming at. thh’ greater glory of God is a conspicuous mark°6t: Jesuit spirituality. A similar and more, or less equivalent idea that .was a great ~avorite with St. Ignatius and Occurs still more frequently is "serv~ ice)’ "Locutions such as ’to the greater s~rvice of God," ’to the greate~r service of God and the help of soul~.’ andtheir-like, are re-peated 157 times in the Constitutions" (lb’id.). Servin~ God is bf course the same’as Working out His purpos.es or .extending His glory, and it may be said to be central in Ignatius’s whole conception of what-man’s relations and activities tbward God should be. Some religious leaders wduld’no doubt put prayer or e~en mortification in the, central pl~ace; for Ignatius, everything, "prayer. recollection, self-a. bnega~ion, and so on, mu~t be subordinated to the glory and seroice of God~ Int(hding what God intends, seeking His glory, serv.mg Him~-all this implies the need and use of means. St. Ignatius is broad enough f0 regard all created things as these~mean~. "He is insistent too that they are to be used neither more nor less than in the measure of their ~utility with respe& to,the final end. " In no way or degree are they to .be sought for their.own sake as goals.if, they be pleasant.and attrac- °" " ~ : 129 AUGUSTINE G’. F~LLARD Ret~ieu) for Religious rive, and no repugnance to a useful but disagreeaigle mean~ "is to be allowed to interfere v~ith Using it. To the noblest end the best means is alwa,ys, to be chosen. Hence, another celebrated term and idea 6f Jesuit spirituality: namely, indifference.. 2. AssOciation with Christ. A second leading principle in St. Ignatius’s system is "’Associate gourself with Christ as closely as possible." or ’.’Know, love, and imitate Christ as far as possible." Tb~ divine purpose and plan become more specificaIly the progra.m 6f Christ. All Christiahs of course strive to associate themselves with Christ, or to" know and’ love and imitate Him, but not all in precisely the Ignatian.way, that is. in the spirit of "The Kingdom" and tl~e~ "Tw, o Standards." As we have seen. St. Ignatius likes to consider Christ as ;’Our Lord, the .E~ernal K~ing,’" a prince who is"organizing a military ex- ¯ pedition or crusade, to conquer the whole worId and bring it back to loyal" submigsion to itsdivine sovereign. He summons all good men to become recruits in his army, to share his warfare, and then. to rejoice with him in the fruits of victory. Both the royal commander and his soldiers are to live and fight-under the same conditions of toil.-combat. and suffering, that subsequentl~r they. may enjoy the ~same glories of victory together. The motives for enlisting are con-sidered so attractive that nobody with good sense could decline: one v~ould.at least join the expedition as a.common soldier. But with. this degree St, Ignatius is not at all satisfied. In view of the.singularly magnetic qualities.of the Leader and the excellence of His cause, anybody with a spafk of spirit about him will volunter for distinguished service. He will be glad to show. his love and affection by offering himself for deeds of greater value b~yond the call and strict requirement of duty. He will not wait to be attacked, but Will himself take the offensive and carry tb~ war into the enemy’s te(ritory .("acting against"), in particular be will first make a perfect conquest of his own interior foes, and a~gres’- sively overcome his own "sensuality and carnal and w0rJdly love." He Will prof.ess himself ready to imitate his great king in bearing humiliations and poverty. It is thergfore, a cardinal principle of Ignatian spirituality that to the summons of Christ the.King,one should respond with all the magnanimity ~n’d generosity that one can muster. ’ The eager new recruit soon gets lessons ir~ the basic principles df strategy of his own leader and also ~f the enemy ’chief. These are 130 May, 1952 IGNA’I~IAN SPIRITUALITY presented in the colorful exercise called "A Meditation oh "Two Standards." They are further deve!oped affd enforced in rules for, the discernment of spirits. Lucifer’s’tacticsare to be {~nderstood well, and since they are insidious one is ever to be on guard against his deceits. His general ruse is first to seduce men into an inordinate quest for riches and honor, these being indifferent, and then into pride and finally into all vices. The intention of Christ is just the" contrary,~that is, by example and precept He induces men to cultivate" the spirit of poverty, or even actual poverty itself, to conceive "a desire for insults andcontempt," to acquire the. virtue of humility, and thus then to attain all the different virtues. It will be noticed that St." Ignatius ’makes gre, at eff0rys to have his discipline look espe-cially to. t~o aspects of Christ’s moral cha~acte), namely, His poverty and His humility. In the Constitutions of his order and in certain of his letters he adds a third great virtue, tha’t is, obedience. At least for the mem-bers of’the Societ~ this gets so much emphatic commendation and i,nsistence that it,is in a sense the point in which Jesuits are supposed to specialize. 3. The Third Mode of Humilitv ~The "’third mode of humititg" is so highly characteristic of St. , Ignatius’s whole¯ doctrine and so important in itself that it should, it seems,.be proposed ~a third leading principle. It is pre-sented in ~he Exercises as ’the last disposition to be sought in the ideal prepakation of soul to discern and choose the will of God in o.rdering one’s.life. It" is also the highest point that one.could re~cb in conquering self, in achieving the victory over one’s .disorderly and rebellious impulses, and in-bringing them into that order.which the divine plan and the program of Christ¯req’u!re. In the first mode of humilisy man submits to God in everything that is’ of serious, obligation. The second degree disposes one so to submit as to avoid not only venial sin but also every defect of in-difference and hence all positive imperfections (failure to "carry out counsels). In the third. kind" ’.’whenever the prfiise and glory of God would be equally served, I desire, and choose poverty with Christ poor, rather than riches, ir~ order toimitate and be in reality more like Christ our Lord,; Icho~se insults with Christ loaded with them, rather than honors; I desire to be accounted as worthless and ¯ a fool for Christ, rather than to be este,emed as w)se and prudent in 131 AUGUSTINE G. ELL~ARD ’ Reuieu~ [or Religious thi~:.world. So Chr.ist wastrea~ed before me" (Exqrcise~, 167). In a_ word,, the p~fect associate of Jesus makes himself like,Him~as far - as possible, iriall virttles, but especially, other consideration} being equal, in pove, rty and humility.° l~vidently reverence and love’and dexiotion to Him rango no farther. Practically one’piefers just what, Christ prefers. " " 4. To Love God . - A fourth leading principle in Ignatian spiritual training’is "’in all things to live and serde the Divine Majesty" (Exercises, 233). Eveiy schodl of spirituality, merel~r to be Christian, must keep in the ¯ forefront the primacy of.love: , Some people have b’een, dishppointed that in expr.essing the end for which God created man St. Ignatius did not mention love. True, it is not named ~here: but as surely and as fully as it enters into the divi~e plan and intention, it is ther’e implication. " The constaht desire,.’too, to choose only thatwbich is most conducive tO the end would invol-ie much love" for God. Even. inmeditating upon. hell it is St. "Ignatius’s.mind that love should have a certain priority~’ one prays :’that if. through my fault~ I fc~rget the love of the eternal Lord, at ieast the fear of..thes~ punishments ~vill keep me.’ fr6m falling into sin’’~ (Exercises, 65,).. Throughotit. the second, third, and fourth weeks of the Exercises the preva.iling general objective is to ’achieve. with an intimate l~nowl~dge and exact imitation, an ardent love for ~he God,man. The. climax is reached in the celebrated "Contemplation to, a[tain the Love°of ’God" (Exercises,- 2 3 O- 2 3 7). , Love shows that it is genuine by ’~de~ds rather than. wqrds." It consists especially "in a mutual sharing of goods." 0n-His part God presents us with the whole gamut of creation, the to~ality of Hi~ ~xternhl goods, :and then in addition ’:the same Lord desires to give H’imself to~’ His beloved "according to His divine decrees."" In graieful and. generous respqnse one breaks Out into the,"Suscipe,’" relinquishing to the great Infinite Lover the complete possession an’d disposal ofoneself. Every word.in this rnagn!ficen~ exercise prepares one to love the ingffable Divine Goodness literally." with all the ener-gies. of one’s soul and bod~r and to demonstrate the truth ofonUs affection by.’ reall~~dciing everything that,¯pleases God and nothing that could.displease Him. Before worl~ing out the ConstituiiOns for his Society~St. Ignatius laid:it dowri as the first principle that it was not any ~xterior regu-lations that were to g~uide the order, but rather the interior law of 132 Mag,1952 IGNATIAN SPIRITUALITY love and charity..tl~tt the~ Holy Spirit inscribes in the human.heart. One of the Society’s first rules is tl~at its members shouldstrive in all their acts to serve and plea~e.the,infiniteiy ~oi~d God for His~ own sake and with. a view to repaying His 10ve and His immense li~eralit~ to them. Hope ’for rewar, ds or fear.of.pu6ishment are to,have only as~cbndary~ role. God is to be .loved in all His creatures, and con-versely too they all in Him. ÷ A distinction has been drawn between two philos0phies.of love: 6he. called pb~tsical, emphasizes the tendency of love to base itself’on unity and~to proceed, to ever greater unior~: it is seen for exa~nple, in ¯ the desire to be with one’s parents or relatives. The other; termed ecstatic, emphasizes duality or. diviSion and the iffclination in certain cases for a love} to go outside of himself, as it were,..or t6 give him-self up for the sake,of the beloved: it is exemplified in the self-sacrifice. of mothers for their children or of soldiers for their country-men.-. ,Likewise attention has been.called to .two theological concep-, tions of charity: one, that of personal desire, we might, say, considers the act whereby one wills the Infinite Good to oneself to be charity; so, for’instance, St. Bonaventure.. The-other, that of pure benevo-lence, regards this act ds belonging to hope and excludes sucb s~If-reference from charity: so"Sdarez; it would love God. Simply and ab~olutely_.for His infihite goodness 6~ ~or Himself. - C6rresponding to these two philosophical and t’.he01ogical views one may digcern two general, ty, pe~ of spirituality;: the .first centers around the direction of seeking greater:union with’God, It would firid Gospel .warrant in the text: "That they ~ill may,be one: that, as Thou, Father. art in M~, and. I am in Thee. they als0 may be one in us" (John 17:21,, Spencer version)¯ It, wbhld lik~ to save its life.’ °A mystery of predil.ection for it is the .Ihcarnation. the supreme~ union of God and ma.n. It is illustrated in the li~ds and doctrines of Saints Augustine. Thomas, Teresa John bf the Cross, John Eudes, and many otber~. It makes for contemplation, and would ’likb to "’taste" or "’enjoy’: God. The second type of spirituhlity takes rather the direction of self-giving. It gets inspiration from tbe text: "Greater love has no. .one’than this that one should lay down one’s life for one’s friends" (J~hn 15:13). ILisglad to lose its life ’ (Mark 8!35). Naturally the passionand death of Christ are favorite mysteries. M]~,rtyrdom would be its ’ great consummation. Repres_entatives of this type are . St.° Fr~in~is of Assisi, Thorhas ~l Kempis, Francis de Sales apparently, AUGUSTI~qE G.F.LLARD " Reoiem (or Religious arid "~ertainly Margaret Mary Alacoque. St. ,Th~r~se/s idea of love Was "to give all, na~, to give oneself!" .Clearly with these latter, exemplifying the ecstatic tendency of love, and the pure-benevolence conception of c~harity, and the self-sacrificihg type of spmtuahty, St. Ignatius and his school are to be ranged’., The whol~ tenor of his spirit, with its climax in the third mode of l~umility, or in serving the Divine Majesty in everything, is not toward union, but service; not toward enjoyment, but sacrifice; not to~vard rest in God, but work for Him (See De Guibert, ~tudes de Th~ologi~ Mystique, 239-281). 5. Union and Familia(it~ u;ith God Finally, a fifth major principle in St. Ignatius’s generaI method .concerns umon and [amiliarit~ toith God. He’was wont to formu-late it in some such terms as these: "to seek God in all things"; "to fifid God in all things": to be a-pliable "instrument" in "the divine hand." Ih the Constitutions, IX, 2, St. Ignatius givds a rather long and particularized account of what the ideal general of the Society should be. Naturally this picture is at~tbe same time a characterization.of the Saint himself. Among the qualifications required in a future gen-eral the first is as ~ollows: "that he should be most fully united with God our Lord and familihr with Him. as well in prayer as in all his actions." Similar prescriptions are made for other~ who are to, be appointed to lesser offices (Epitome Instituti,No. 740). Thus the Founder showed his supreme concern that above all else members of the Society Should cultivate the closest and most intimate union withGod. The iarge.place which work holds.in the Jesuit ideal and the re-lations between prayer and work in it are highly characteristic. In no other school, as far as I know. is there so great a tendency, to favor work at th~ expense of prayer. A deep’ foundation ofmortifi-cation and solid virtue being presuppos’e.d, from, say, the novitiate, or some similar training and including a thirty-day retreat, praye~r is to be cultivated until one has the proper disposition, that is, the will to love God with all one’s heart and to carryout the whole of the divine design for one. Butthen, in view of the grave nedessitles.of souls and the needs of the Church, one should leave prayer and give all one’s energies to doing God’s work, saving-and.sanctifying men, long ago pronounced to be, of all divin~ things, the divinest. When a man goes about his work precisely as God’s, doing just what He 134 Marl, 19 ~ 2 IGNATIAN Si~IRITUALITY indicates, because He Wills it, a’nd in tb~ manner that He wisbes, it is relativel~r easy and natural to pass back and forth between pra~rer and work, Striving to’do God’~ work according to the mind and in the spirit ,of God may be said to be itself not the least f~rm of prayer. Faithful disciples of St. Ignatius are "contemplatives ~in action." To illustrate the union that shoulci exist between one who works for God and God Himself, a favorite comparison of St. Ignatius was that of instrumental adaptation. "l=he .human worker should bea completely pliant instrument in the divine hand. A perfect personal instrument would be fully sensitive and responsive to all the motions of that hand. To give one such instrumental flexibility is, according to St. Thomas, the tendency of the gifts of theHoly Spirit (I, IL 68, 3).. The most exquisite docility to the Holy Spirit is a capital aim" in the doctrine of one of the Society’s most distinguished spir-itual masters, Ft. Louis Lall~mant. III. DISTINCTIVE PRACTICES Certain practices are characteristic of Jesuit asceticism. Nowadays some of these are more or less universal in the Church. But in origin, or at Ieast in their wide difft~sion, they are due largely tothe influence of Ignatius. I. Spiritual Exerciseg, Retreats perhaps the practice that is most obviously distinctive of those who follow the Jesuit ~chool is that they make retreat~ and attacl~. great lmpor.tange to them. And more pafticulhrly, they do’it accord- . ing to the scheme and sequence of exercises sketched out long ago by the knight-conver~ .at Manresa. The Exercises were’originally cab culated to last for a solid month, and in this in~egral, form they are made by all Jesuit novices and again by young Jesuit priests, toward the end of their training. Other Jesuits regularly repeat them in a condensed form for eight days every year. $6 als.o, for varying peri-ods, ..do many who do not belong to the Society and still make use Of ,its.spiritual a.,ids..The numerous students in Jesuit high schools .and, colleges throughout the world.make annual three-day retrea,ts. More-over m.a~y dev0u~ lay men and women make Jes..uit retreats annuall,y. .,..:~.S~.~.Ign..atiu.s himse.l.f did not advocate regular retreats. The cus-tom gradu,~,.lJ;¥..-gre.w in tb, e. Sgciety and w~s made. a-matter of rule only in 1609. ’ It is very..!argely due tO Ignatius’s influence, directly o~r ~nd~rectly,. that now the practice of making annual or regular re- 135 AUGUSTINE G. ELLARD °, Reoie~o [.or ’Retigiotis ’treats is f, oi religious and clerics a point of. canon lavi, and a received~ ascetical usage in the C~hu~ch. . ¯ o , : . .’~ :2. The Particular Examen Another" practice that was originally most characteristic of l~fie Ign~tian approach, is ,the particular examination 9[ conscience. Essen-tially it is :nothing el~e than using in the. war with one’s’.faults ~bat ancient priii~iple ot: strategy: "Divide and con’quer!" In’more mod-ern and universal terms one might say that it exemplifies the rule,: "Specialize! ’Concentrate on a .l!m!ted field!" The,particular examen was always a great.favorite with St.-Ignatius. It is now one of tlqe common techniques of Catholic asceticism. Sometimes,. it iS censured by men who concentrate all if/dr strutiny of it upon some minor, de-tail or other .in the method and overlook What is substantiaia~out ’it. On tlqe other harrd, even some ~f the minor features of it have of late been getti,ng ~ommendation from scientific psyc.hologists. . 3. Directi6n A~ third practice..that is distinctive in its way of I~natian spir-ituality is its idea of direction. S’t. Ignatius considered it especially useful,, if-nbt, necessary, to prevent one from ~alling victim to the illusions that may come either from one’s own imagination and ~mo-tions 0~ from the deceits and snares of the evil spirit. As compared with (h~ older school~, Stl Igna’tiu~ advocates., if I mistake not, a more thorough-going and a more.methodicM’u~e of it. On the .other hand. he did not employ it like St. Francis de Sales or others in seventeenth-century France. The Exercises were originally designed ¯ to be made individually with a private and.experienced director and the exercitant was’urged to be very frank and open with him. In the Societyit is expe’ct~d that subjects should make themselves, even their innermost co~nsc.iences, all their good and bad points; culpable or in-culpable, fully known to their superi6rs orconfessors and in return .. receive individual~pat~nal guidance.. Any eager adherent of 3esuit asceticism will, if possible, seek constant expery direction from an-other in the problems of his in(erio~ life. Complete candor of soul and docility toward a director or supe,rtor fit in very’ well with cer-tain qualities of character that wer.eparticularly dearto St. Ignat!us: namely..his preferences for mortifitation that is interior, of judgment and will; for prudence, humility, discipline, and obedience. 4. Mental Pra~er " " An~ outs.tanding, mark of any system of asceticism is its doctrine 136 May, 19~ 2 [GNATIAN SPIRITUALI~’~ on prayer.. If one compares the’ modern theory and practi~e of.p~aye.r with the.ancient or the medieval,’ One will n~tice great differences in the relative positions of vocal ~nd m~ntal prayer. T.he cha~g~s had been coming of. necessity inthe historical evolution of the spir~itual and the religious life. In determining the. actual extension.anti fO~m" that they have taken since" the sixteenth centu.ry th~ ,influence of St. Ignatiu~s, direct or indirect, was a major factor. In making the Exercises and then later irl striving "to arrive ~at perfecti6n in whatever state or way of life God our Lord .may gra.nt. us to ’choose’;- (135), it is ~onkidered most {¢ital that one’s koUl’ should be illled with "the iiatimate understaqdjng and rql~sh’of the" ¯ great Christ~ian truths (2). Often. eno~ugh pegple refe~ to the first ineth~d of mental, prayer ifi th~ Exercises:, ~h~ on~ ~here named from ’~tiSe thr~e powers .of the soul," fi’s "’the.Ign’atian method." As a matter of fact, in that little-booklet the Saint proposes at least six methbds, and thi~ c~ne,0used for the consideration of abstract truths, is almost immeasurably out-numbered by the ~’qontefiaplations," according ~o persons, words, ~nd actions, that deal especial,l~ with the life and pa~ssion of Christi o Except.~when misconceived by ill-informed critics or misu’sed by ignorant persons, Ignatian methods of prayer do not hinder liberw of spiri~ or stand in the~ w~y bf ~he Hgly Ghost:s irispiration~s. It is the most rudimentary¯ principle of ,Jesuit spirituality to keep the ~na clearly, in: mind, to preserve lib.erty with respect to the mearts, and, to select and use the most apt .of the means. Even in the Exercises/writ-ten qspecially for beg)nners..to aid them in the. specific and passing task of rightly d~t~rmining their vo.cat.ion, the admonition is given: .It "should be noted:... I will remain quietlymeditating upon the point in.which I have found what I desire, without e?gerness~ to go on till I. have finished"-(76). And again later on: "If in contempl~- ~tion, say., on the Our Father,he finds in,one or two words abundant -matter forethought and much relish and consolation, he should not b~.anxious to go on,~though the whole hour be taken t~p with what he has found" (254)., Incidyntally; one.may notice that thus from the start St.~Ignatius promotes the tendency to pause in contempla-tion rather ~h:in to busy onesel, f with discursive or analytic reflections: Outside of retreat time ,Jesuits and their followers may and should cultivate those’$orms of mental pra~er, including’the?highest "degrees of cqnteml~la~tion, that will: most effectively advanc~ them in loving God’and in.execating His d.~signs. Naturally,. off course, .th~ . / AUGI.JSTINE G. ELLARD Reoiew for Reliqious prayer of aposto!ic workers will differ from that of cloistered Carme-lite nuns. Similarly ’the’inspirationsof the Holy spirit will be in harmony with one’s divine ~;oc~tion, nbt coiatrary to it. St. Ignatius was a great mystic himself, as his Spiritual dournal amply attests. In others asa rule he looked to solid virtue ’and mor-tification rather" than exalted’st’ates of prayer. If we may generalize" , from a letter to Francis Borgia while the latter was still the Duke of Gan~ia, that form of prfiyer is to be considered-best in which divine ¯ favbrs are received most liberally: "The .best thing for each particu-lar person is that in which God our Lbrd communicates Himself most freely, bestowing His most holy gifts and "s’piritual graces, be- ;cause ’He sees and knows what is most suitable fo~ him, and, as< knowing all, He shows him the way .... These gifts I take to be those that are’ ’nbt’within our power, to have when we wish, but~ rather they are pure presents from Him who gives and can do all that is good; for example ..... an intensifi(ation.of faith; of_ hope, of .charityl delight and repose of spirit, tears, intense consolation, ele-vation of mind, divine impressions and illuminations, with allthe other,~gratifications and spiritu~! f~elings ordained to such ~ifts" (Monumenta. Historica Soc. lesu5 lgnatiana," Series I, Epist. et In-struct., 1548-50, 233-237). " With respect to mysticism, as .in Catholic spirituality generally, so also in Jesuit ~piritual teachi.ng, it is possible to distinguish two historical currents., the one decidedly mystical, and the 6ther rather ascetical. To the first belong, for instance. St. Alphonsus Rodri-guez: DelaPuente. AlvarezdePaz. Caussade. Grou: tothesecond, Rodriguez, Roothaan. Meschler. . Of th~ masters in mysticism the one best known is Louis.Lalle- . mant (France. 1587-16~5). He was followed by a number of noted and influential disciples. "The w, ork which, presents his. ~teaching, The Spiritual Doctrine o~ Louis Lallemant. has tradition-ally been used in the Society to form its young p.riests in their year of ttii~d probation in much the same way as the ascetical Rodriguez is used for the instruction of the novices. ¯ . Certain spiritual writers of the Society" have been considered ant~mystical: among them are Mercurian, Rodriguez, and Scaramelli~ When their statements are viewed against the historical background, properly interpreted .with allowances for changed termi-~ nology,, and compared with the utterances of,.other authorities of their time~;,, then the significance of. this anti-mystical bias is..seen to 138 May, .1952 IGNATIAN SPIRITUALITY be more apparent thai{ ’real. In any case, no matter how g~eat it Should seem to be, it is completely outweighed by what other 3esuits have dbne for the cause of mystical contemplfiti0n: Moreover no 3euit ever went so far as to deny that one should fully de~velop his gifts of ~he Holy Spirit, welcome every infusion of grace~that God should wish to give ’him, and then eagerly make the most of it all. In the recent centroversies over the nature of infused ~ontemplation, its pla’ce in the general economy of the spiritual life, and the call to it, there have been 3esuits on both sides. 5. Self-Abrogation ,The Ignatian and Jesuit~ practice or: mortification is very different. from. the ’ancient and medieval austerities, and it in turn appears to have had great influence in de’termin~ng what. the use of it should be in the modern Church genera!ly. Nowl evidently, bodily penances. do not occupy so promine,nt a place in the total scheme. They are, more consciously and more narrowly subordinated to the ’greater and, superior elements in the spiritual life. The employment of them is much more under the, control of directors and confessors. -There is ’far greater tendency to seek the’necessar); self-abnegation in the hard-ships of communhiwtyn g’ a’n d e ~ p e c t"al l)y in laborious work for souls. ,The body ~ spared much punishment and in exchange it is eXPected to become a more effective instrument for the spirit. In principle Ignatian mortification is as austere as one could wish. The indifference of the Exercises implies that one should be willing, whenever.the di~;ine purpose or plan requires it, to forego the niost pleasant means or. undergo the use of the most unpleasant. Self-conquest and self-control are to be so complete that no movement of the lower propensities can draw the deliberate will after it. Asking Christ, crucified for one’sown sires, what one should do for Himand then giving the decent answer t6 one’s questio.n also includes the ut-most degree of self,crucifixion.- The noble knight’s response to the -summons of Christ the King and Captain in~colves the fullest obla-tioh of self, and in particular the firm determination to take the offensive, in waging war on one’s own sensuality and worldliness. Finally the climax of self-abnegation is reached in the third mode of humility: preferring, other things being equal, the poorer and hum-bler things just to be" more closely united .with Christ poor and humiliated. One of the rules that St. Ignatius left for his softs is that their chief pursuit should be .to seek in the Lord their greater mortification and, as far .as possible, constant self-abnegation. In 139- AUGUSTINE (3. "ELLARD -’ Rtt~ieto-for Reli~libus~ disposition of will,he exacts as much as St. J6hn of the Cross_does, but his manner of doing it is much’less fo~rbidding, as it in turn is harsher and less attractive than that of St. Francis de Sales. In al~p[ying the principle or in practice St.~ Ignatius Wouldhave disciples be careful not tb injure their health or diminish their bodily forces~ and interfere with th’eir spiritual development or ability to work efficiently.. The outcome has been that Jesuit direction and ir~fluen;e ~a~ve tended greatly to moderate-the use bf corporal~,inflictions by’ pious people. ’The interior? mortification of the mind and.will, in ~oerfectl bbedience, for example, is as~igned.a large margin of priority, 6. Devotion to the Sacred Heart ,:. A practice that is very p~ominent in. modern Jesuit spirituality and cannot be said to characterize the original asceticism of" St. Ig-natius, is devotion to the Sacred Heart6f desus.. I.n.the. revelations m_ade toSt. Margaret Mary, Christ expresse.d the desir~ that cultivat-ing the devotion and p.ropagating it as widely~ as possible among all ~he faithful should b~ a special charge of the Society of Jesus.. The Society, whe(her in its superiors or its members generally, has Mways felt that this commission was peculiarly in keepi.ng ~’ith it~’primitive smpa~kiriint,g a tnhde hheenacrte o hfa ist sb gee~na tg Llaed~ dtoe rd oan~d w Khiantgev. ebre ittt ecro kunldo tw6wn ahrndd loved. Any means to win’hearts to Jesus,is welcome, arid this d~vo-tion to His lovifig but neglected Heart is a most attractiv.e and effec-. tive one, Fostering and deepening’tbei~ own dedication’to theHeart of Jesus is c.ofisidered by all.Jesuits to be one of .the bes~: measures that they can tal(e ~o ~an~tify themselves and to vivify their apostolic activity.. On~ couldnot b~ a student, in a Jesuit school or a member of one of their parishes witiaout being finder a certain constant urging to honor’ the Heart of Christ. Great multitudes Of the faithful daily.. inake’ the offering of all their Works and sufferings.in union With the intention of that Heart. x Nor cou.ld one read very t:ar in moslem" Jesuit spiritual literature ii¢ithout .finding much that gi.ves it.,all a turn toward loving the Heart of the S~ivior... :. IV. DISTINCTIVE -TRAITS Modernity is a ma~k,, of Jesuit spirituality, obviously fh th~ chronological’sense, arid ~especjally-also in thht its genihs is not ancient Or medieval, but in harmony with the modern Catholid men-. tality. -Negatively, .and b~z way 6f "going against," it has animated men who were in the forefront of the Church’s war against Luther- May, 1957, IGNATIAN SPIRITUALITY ~ anism,. °Caivinism, Jansenfs.m~. and Quietism. Positively it’ possesses certain points bf affinity to mbdern social cbnditibns. In ;contrast to the Middle Ages. Catholics now are ih a more"hqstile, milieu ai’id an aggressive type Of spirituality befits them:. Men and women cuhb vating the supernattiral life riow as a rule get less h~lp from dloistered seclusion’, live in the turmoil of large cities, are reqhired to give more. ¯ attentiori to action and less to . contemplation. " and !astly~ must be educated a~ well as devout, l~or the lbss of the cloister desui~ spir- "itual traiifing comp~nsate~ in various ways: all designed to make ,up in interioi individual strength for:the extgrrial aids that"had to be given,tip. Frdm "the Kingdom" and ’~tl~e Two Standards" on. is thoroughly orientated toward living~and s.truggling in the’midst, of groups. Its connections with the ¯active ¯life in the Church and education-need no c6m~en~. ~" Another.h, ote of.!gn~itlan asceticism is its higl~ degree bf or.aar~.. ization. It is hardly conceivable that one could become ..well acquainted With the Spiritu.al Exercises or~ the Society of ’Jesus and their spiritual system withou~"remarking w~hat a compiicate~l but strictly unified order or method characterizes all thi’ee of them. No other school of spirituality is so consdiousl¯~z m’ethbdical ani:l insistent. about prudently arranging mean~ to" ends. From a military officer one might expect Well thought-o.utstrateg~. Hdwever, theaim, of it ~ill’being union of the human spi[it with the divine spirit there,is. nothing mechanical about it. Ig.nafian spirituality is conspicu~ou~ly and eminently apostolic. =Fvpical is the. injunction said to. have been given by him to; St. Francis Xavier when despatching him to the Orient:, "Go, and inflame the world!" . Jesuit asceticism is eminently practical. There is nothing then- . retjca’l~’about it. It emphasizes above all the ~ictual accomplishment" of the divine will arid purpose. Doing the will.of’the .Father is" ’always P0ssib!e, feasible, and most fruitful. The directives~, given are clear, precise, and ample, but not more "r’estrictive than the.divine plan itself. Personal initiative is encouraged, and it is suggested;, with bothSt. AuguStine and St. Thomas (In Matt. xxv, 15), that v~here there is more effort, there also there will be more grace. Natural means are cultivated and.exploited to.supernatural ends. A"~ peculiarly distinc[ive mark of Ignatian spirituality i.s~,the. .rnilitaryland chivalrous note that runs t~rough it, Don Ifiigo Lopez de Lo’yo!a wa~ born ar~’d .brought up an aristocrat.. ~By.profession’-’he AUGUSTINE G. ELLARD was an army officer. Early sixteenth ci~ntury Spain was still tense with the spirit of the crusades.. Upon the Soldier’s conversion divine grace sublim~l~ed to the supernatural sphere his knightly ideas and. ideals. The very, title of the Exerdises gtates that they prepare one for "th~ conquest 6f self"- (21). Of all those .exercises his two favorites were "the Kingdom" and "the Two Standards." both of them thoroughly’imilitary and crusading in.inspirati0n. The So-ciety of Jesus is dedicated to "waging war for God under the stand-ard of the Cross." It was conceived as a sort of shock-troop to be thrown into battle wherever the Church’s danger seemed to be worst. Its name originally was, arid as a ,m~tter, of fact in several languages still is, equivalently, "the Compan~l of Jesus." It was its first su~ preme commarider’s great aim to be himself, and as far as, p0ssible to makeeveryone else, ’a noble knight of Jesus Christ." Another note that appears to characterize Ignatian ascesis is a certain dynamism: that is, in a special sense it is marked by force, power, energy. There is not much about i,t that is gentle~ tender, or -mild. St. Ignatius himself was naturally a virile personality of great earnestness and intensity He came into the bi~tory 6f the Church at a most critical tur’ning-point. In particular, the early Protestants were preaching the depreciation of good works. An emergency situation called for the most vigorous reaction, and that is .just what the Saint’s magnanimous nature inclined him to. In our days he has been reproached by Henri Bremond with being, "’not a master of prayer, but a professor of energy." He would have his disciples share in God’s own eagerness to communicate His goodness and in theEternal Ki.ng’s ardor to conquer all koulS. T.he feeling dominant in the. Jesuit spirit is not orie of seclusion and peace: rather it is a sense of war and battle. Nor is it one of quiet study or contemplation: it is rather an air of tensenes~ ’and actiycity. Nor is it one of want or suffering: instead it i~ an eagerness to make use of things and to get a great task done. "’Ad maiorem Dei gl6riam" suggests this fact:it points to the incessant, irrepress-ible, d~namic, straining for ever greater and greateraccomplishments for God that the Jesuit sets as his goal. Finally, to conclude, we might sum up Ignatian and Jesuit.spir-ituality in some such terms as these: the first and basic principle is to pursue the divine purpose and plan: the .central principle, to know, love, and imitate Cbristas fully as possible; and the last and highest, "in all things to love and serve the Divine Majesty." 142. Cust ocly-o[- t:he Senses Everett J~ Mibach,.S.J." DISSIPATION is a word frequently associated With the’, g~y habitu~ of night club society. Piously ~re thank G0~t that high cloister .walls protect us from such an evil. And yet physicians of souls affirm that beneath many a peaked cowl or properly starched coif there dwells a dissipated religious. ¯ The .symptoms of dissipation a~e easily discernible. The most striking is a lack of recollection. Distractions which had b4en kept t_o a miniinum now invade the mind like a caravan of noisy gypsies.~ Instead of resenting the intrusion the trespassers hre made to feel quite welcome. The imagination is quickened with a variety of phantasms and the religious revels before the inchless screen of his own television set. Personal ekp4rien~e should be ample ,proof for the necessity of recollection in the .spirituallife. A distinction can be made between recollection’ that ;is actual and that which is habitual. When the niin& is here and noto fixed upon God Or other super-natural truths, recol.lection is said .to b~actual. Recollection ’i~ ,habitual when one frequenttqthinks about God or spiritual things with attention and love so that one acquires the habit of easily re-suming such thoughts when. the pressure of external dt~ties is less-ened. Dissipation enervates both actual and habitual recollection. ~ Almost imperceptibly supernatural motives’give place to those that are merely natural. Creature comforts are .sought. Rules become a burden. Spiritual ennui follows. Charity grows cold. And as the litany of faults grows longer, less ferve’nt becomes the "Deliver me, 0 Lord." If the director diagnoses the case as one of common dissipation he will ordinarily prescribe a:large dose of the Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat treatment--Custod~l of "th~ Senses.~ Or as some prefer to la.bel it--Exterior Recollection. Experience has taught him that such dissipatioh with its. accom-panying ills is the immediate outcome of .t.o.o free an indulgence in the world of sense. Failure to maintain a vigilant guard over¯ the senses has resulted in serious spiritual debilitation. We know frorfi psychqlog~;t.h.a.t, all iof .our k,now..ledge .com~s to _us thfo,ugfi the fivt~ external senses, t,,., Sense iNages ,.once fokmed.in the.,imaginatioh" 1-.4.3 EVERETT J. MIBA~H ¯ . \ a tendency tq.reappear before our consc~ousfiess. o Reoietv,for Reliq~ous ,If they~have been port,rayed fr, equently and Vividly thei~ reappearance .wi.ll be muFh more frequent and vivid. Usually they do not return’alOne but are accomp;inied 1by-their entourage of associated images. These~ with ,magnet-like pull attract the will and excite" th~ sensibilities.’ It is obvious, therefore. ~hat a religious should ,try to avoi.d ~relJeating or ,intensifying imag~s, that are. foreign to a life of.prayer. Rather . should be tryto repeat and intensify thos~ that. are proper and help- " ful’to his.spiritual life[ Since we live.in a world of sense and often enough our work dema’nds that we give ours’elves to-profane thinking, .fOr F~xample, planning the senior formal, we~sh0uld limit our imagination and thoughts to wha~ is strictly usb[i~l. ’The reli-gious who is intent upon a life of intimate union with God will do his utmost to regain and maintain recollection. This means willingly submitting to a spirit.ual cauterizing 0fthe senses. We who profess-to be Christians can learn a lessoh from. the pagan Orient.. The, Chinese. "realizing that the wife’s place is within the home and not outside, call their wives "wo nei tzu" ("my within one")..In times past’, tbey even-bound the f~et of their women to make gadding about difficult. Thus .they would be more content, to remain at home with their husbands.. In.their pictur?sque calligraz ¯ phy the characte~ for "roof" is written and then a :’woman" is placed under itand a new word is born "peace’." The idea is’clear. ¯ If the Woman remains at home under ~he roof peace will result. So, too, the.religious should be happy to remain within hirriself and. enjoy the company of the Divine Spouse. Gladly he will bind his senses lest they lead him astray.:. Arid that peace promised by Christ, a peace which the world cannot give, will~ fill th~ soul. To be practical~conside} thee eyes. Looking at. everything they can, ,they are .never content but always want more. It is not a question here .of looking at. things that are sinful in themselves. They are innocent enough.. But th~s very fact can make them more dan~gerous. .Theii real danger.is not immediately apparent. Almost from in~tinct a. religious.recoils from looking at what is sinful. But the practice of refu.sing the eyes cu~io6~, gratifications has been laid aside. What to do about it? A~e we never to look about at God’s good. earth which. His loving and paternal’ hand has made so beaufi-ful for our pleasure? Are we always* to,keep our.eyes cast upon the ground lkboking like some Of those monstrous caricaturds .of the Saints.~ Or pe.rhaps it should bewritten of us as it was of some .holy 144 Maq, 1952 ~ . CUSTODY OF:THE’SENSES friends of-God that we never.saw the ceiling of our cell? No, these ’are special graces not meant for ~veryone., I However, a religi0"u~ desirous of union-shouldtry-to devel.6p th~ .. habitof not looking while seeing. What does fhis mean? Let~us take’ an ix. ample from daily, life. A person is .walking alo.ng tbe~ street. In h shop ~indow~some attra’ctive, bright-coloredobject falls ¯ into his range of.vision. He can concentrate his mind upon it, judge about its beauty, its utility, it~ pri~e;,and its desirab’ility. Thus he intensifies the stimulus received. Of the image can, simply pass, in and outof his mind making no lasting impression. -It isas thoug~ a s~trip of film had passed through.-the pr0Jecto~ withou.t the light being" turned, on, or better still, with a fight too dim to cast a bright pic-ture. We notice when walkin~ about our room we do~ not bump into the prie-dieu or knock over tile chairs. The presence of the fur-niture ~nd its respective position is on the fringe of ou~ cons~i6usness. We have seen Jrwithout looking at it. ° We did not direct our, att’en-tion to it. We are not intensifying it by concentration. So, many of ou/daily experiences bear this out. If. we’are walking down the street with a dear friend and are engrossed’in our cbnve~sation, we. pass by hundreds of attractive sights without looking at them. Our interest is.centered bn our companion. Our conversation with God should be like that when we are walking alone with Him. Just as we can practice not looking while seeing so too we can, practice not listening while, hearing. The number of Words that daily clamor for Our atte6tion is legion. ~They, beat incessantly upon ¯ our ears. No one would be so foolhardy.as to assert that all of,tl’iem are ils~ful or necessary. Each one mfist evaluatefor himself the t~e of listening tha~ furthers his union with God and that Which hinders " it. With the necessary, modification we might take f~r our.motto one suggested by the railway cross!ng: Stop Looking and Ltsteriing. The .sens~ of sight and he~ring are mentioned by way of’illus-tration. The same degree of watchfulness must be exercised over the three rem@ining senses. Each i~ne must be ~tisciplin’ed~and made into a good and faithful servant. If ndt they will bec6me insatiable tyrants. However, it must be remembered that.custody of th~ senses is only a means to furthering union with God. It is not an end in itself. Therefore, lille all means to an end.it must be tised~nly inso-far as it helps to attain that end. If someone’s Custbdy ofthe senses ~;ould..be So strict’that he would not be able. to fulfill the duties 6f his:stat~ in fifehe Wotild be deluding himself. This custodyhas its negative side. Negation is never encourag- MICHNEL d. LAPIERRE ¯ . Review/:or Religious ing. "No’." does not stir one’s enthusiasm. We sh6uld look at the posiiive aspect~. It.is not s9 much a giving up as a gaining,. It is the atmosphere in which the spiritual life flourishes. Every victory over the’w~rld of sense is a step nearer to greater union..Our"choice ban be Christ oi some tawdry gratification. We can be an attentive¯ spouse of Christ or a commonfish monger haggling in the market place. The Sacred A Tho’ugh : :o.r Religious ¯ Michael J.. Lapierre., S.J. THE hard doctrines of’J~nsenism were in the middle years of ~he seventeenth ~:entury withering men’s hearts and smothering in men’s soials the radiant’love of Our Divine Saviour for each of His children: The Sacred Heart’of Jesus in order to counter this blight, wished to bring once again before the eyes of men, the depths of His divine and burning love, the riches of His ’great sacrifice hnd His aching desires for them. To lead in carrying ’through this work. of zeal, He c~aose St. Margaret Mary.. In this choice made by Our Saviour there are two points worthy of our notice. This does not ~nean that there are not other points which iv.would be quite worth.our, while to consider; nor does it necessarily mean that, these points which wd are about to. consider are the most¯important or the most pgominent in this. action of the S~cred Heart of Jesus’. We simply intend that two aspects or two angles of this choice can very well be the s{arting point-and supply. us with excellent matter for a short consideration. These two aspects are, first, the manner in which Our Lord made the choice; secondly, the object of this choice. God’s works are ever sources of w~nder to us; no/ less indeed the works of nature than the works of gtace,~ut especially the works of grace. .He acts in His own infinitely¯wise though unexpected and unfathomable manner. When He sent His ~only-begotten Sgn to redeem the world, He did~ot send Him in thd ti~ppings of’royalty and herald His a~Proach by a ¯world shattering r?~ol’ution. Jesus Christ’ entered this .world in an un~bt.r.usive manner, in the, ordinary and expected way.of~a poor woman s ghdd. There ~9~ fPg H~m the /o gh’ d ’ he wa~ above all the Warm and.vib~afi~ ~evotib~’ bf a’~0the~’s fihdyifig May, 1952 THE SACRED HEART love. If there were the songs of angels and the appearar~ce of a star, these were to emphasize Christ’s regard for ~he "lowly and the poor" and fi~r the heaven-centered mind. Likewise, in His effort to .stir men’s heart~ to make Him some return for the amazing condescension of His ¯love in the Incarnation He makes no "Miracle "of the Sun," He inaugurates¯ no "Ten Days Which Shook the World," I-Ie~ displays no "AtomicExplos"m n s", no "Flying Saucer" feats. His design is not to constrain the mind; His purpose¯is not to force an assent; hence He does not plan breath-taking billboards, outline high-pressure sale~ talks, organize public drives for charity’s s~ke. These devi~ces h~ve ¯their time and place; they can achieve temporal results. But’_e~ernal temples rest secure only if set upon imperish~ible bases. OutLord wished to effect an eternal revolution in the human heart, "Unless you shall do penance (i.e. have a’change of heart) you s.hall likewise perish" (Luk~ 13: 5)’ He set about it in a very simple way. He picked out one of His .ser:cants. and entrusted’ to her the mission of making known tt) men His ardent and ovetw, helming love for them. He gave her’to taste of the burning passion of His Sacred Heart and to know of the depths of His love manifested in the-Incarnation, in His terrible Passion and Death, in the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar, that the flame of’ love awakened in her soul might awaken a response in other souls until the whole world became inflamed and’enlivened with a thirsting de-sire and driven by a relentless zeal to.meet, in some way, this tre-mendous outpouring of His love. Of all the ways He might have chosen He picked this very ordinary; one. dust as when He’ came fo teach us the way to Heaven He chose to spend thirty years .in a hid- "~den village.of Galilee and ofily three in public activity. For He knew .that only hot coals glow; that it is the inner fire that gives the ward radiance. "Wherefore His manner of enkindling this fire which He had cast upon the earth, while exceedingly simple was by far the best. "’Cot ad cot loquftur." "Heart to Heart." To rekindle this spark of divine fire so~ dampened in human hearts, the Sacred Heart chose a sickly nun in a Visitandine Convent. of the seventeenth century at Paray-le-Monial. A poor cloistered religious was to d6 all in her power to make the love Of the Satred~ Heart of desus knowfi and appreci.ated by’men. St. Margaret, had "never en~’isaged’such a task. She had never claimed for herself the the.Voice of a dohn the ~aptist or the flambo~:ancy of a 3oan of Arc. She was unknown and unthought of by the world at large, pa.rticu- 147 MICHAEL d. LAPII~RRE larly that world where wealth is th~ mark of Review [or Relioio’us distinction’ and popularity the gage of success. _It is startling in (,t.s unexpectedness startling too in" its ~eemin’gly cross-purposes, that the Sacred Heart should app.eal~tba ~eligious pledged to a life of prayer and contem-’ plation, of silence and ,of solitude, separated, therefore, from th~ haunt~ of men,and from contact, with a great :variety of people. The S~cred Heart.picked a religious,’in fadt, a cloistered religious ~---apparently not the most apt ifistrument to catch the world’s fancy¯ ~ and’toset it aflame with passion, ate. devotion to a cause.¯ Though we are unable to sound’ the. s~crets of Divine Wisdom or disengage the ¯ moiives for" His’action, We may by a little reflection upon the duties oLa r_eligiou~ discover some reasons foi the choice. Religious by their -vocation dedicate and Consecrate tbdmselves to the¯ services of Christ. We naturally.~expect that if Christ’s truth’i~as takeri a firm hold in an~" mind, if His love has caught fire in any heart, it has don~ so in ~tbe mind and in the heart of a religious. " " ~ ’.It’is hardly an ,e~aggeratibn. to say-that Christ expected it so. Ceitainly what St. M.arga~et Mary sought in her convent home at . Paray ~vas simply Our Lord Himself. She sought Him through suf-ferings and humiliations, carried out in obedience to superiors arid in, complete abandonment to God’s - desires, W, fiat the Sacred Heart sdught in that same convent home was a soul cbmpletely devoted to Him. He found it in St. Margaret Mary and made her th~ "Beloved Disciple 6f Hi~ Sacred Heart" and a missioner to establish t~is devo-tion. If we incline to consider-the choice somewhat inept we should also incline to consider Christ’s inanner of spreadifig the Kingdom of ¯ God by spen.ding thirty y~ears bidden in the tin~ village of Nazareth a little bizarre.. We cannot hedge in God’s activity.with human cate-gories. For as the’Prophet Isaias (55:8) says, ".For’ my thc~ughts are not Your /hougbts, nor Your ways my ways." In missions where God is the sender ’it is well never to forget the remark of St. Paul to the Corinthians, "For ~onsider" your own call, brethren.; that therg wTe.re not;many wise according to theflesh, not ma’ny mighty, not many noble. But the foolish things of the world has God chosen to put to shame the wise and th~ weak things, of the world has God, choseri to put,to shame the strong, hnd the base things of the world and the despised has" God chosen, and the things that are nbt,; to bring to naught the’ thipgs that ~are; " lest "any flesh should pride itself befo?e Him" (I Cor. b:2~6). The MagniScat also teaches us. how the power of God is made "perfect in infirmi’ty": for 148 Mat!, 1952 I ,~TI~E SACRED ~ART its theme is..."because HE hath reg~irded the humilit~ .of His hand--- maiden...He hath’filled the empty with ~go_od things~": .He hath alted~ the humble." It is only when we try to peg G~d’s actions by human calculations that we find a~ se-a of incongruities, threatenin~ us. Th~ power of God issuch that it can wokk so .much with so little of wb.at men naturally consider essential to any gr~at enterprise. By the hand of David, a shepherd boy,’God"brought to naught the frightening might of the boastful giant Gbliath. Through the efforts of G~deori and histhree hundred men He scattered the huge army of the Madianites who "lay’scattered in the valley as a multitude of lo-custs. Their c~mels also were innumerable as the-gand that lieth on the seashore". (Judges,. 7 : 12) Gr~ar. names an°d high sounding titles mean little toHim; a submissive will.and ahumble heart are His de-, light. He gives, us riches, yet rejoices .to’find us truly poor in spirii: If we are to enter into the full.mind"of JesUs, ~we canfiot make ~oo . firmly our own this very-fundamental truth that- in our weakness is His strengthi’in’ our humility His good pl~asure: in our povert~r the out~>guring of His gifts. F6r."strengtb is madeperfect in weaknesk." "He scattered the proud in the co’nceit of their hearts.", and "the rich He sent a~ay empty." ." If’we reflect:but a .little we.soon learn that convent eficl0sures are not necessarily a barrier to Gdd;s d~signs. While’furnace walls con-taih ~he raging fire~ within them. they_do not prevent the heat from going out to the objects roond about. While’they contain, they also protect; and by pr0tecting,~they enable the heat to b~ intensifie~l., Cloist~r has a purpose m ways the sam~. Within its shelter religiofis can protect and intensify their ,knbwlei:Ige and their love of God. ~Should this love become lively enPugh, its influence will flow out beyond the convent walls ifito the minds of other men. Jhst as’in the natural organism"the hidden organ’s make thei~ inflhence’ felt in different ways throughout the whole boffy so i’n .the organism which is the.Mystical Body of Christ._ the hidden organs to which, among others,, we. may liken the lives and work’of religious, advance and consolidate .the "b~ilding .upof the Body :of Christ, until we all at-tain to the unity of the Faith and of the deep Kr~6wledge of the Son of ~od, to.perfect manhood, to the mature measure of the. fullness of Christ". (Eph.. 4: 12). And, in truth, if each religious in every mon-’, aste?y throughout the world, burned according to the measur~ 0f.his grace," with an intense love of the Sacred Heart and with a desire" to repair the outrages heaped against that love, he could surely hope to ¯ find ~n" the world about h~m. instead of doubt greater, faith m God’s 149 MI~HA’EL 3. LAPlERRE \ truth, instead of degpai,r greater hope in God’s promises, instead of hatred greater love for the Person of the Word Incarnate. If the Sacred.Heart, by the choice of a contemplative, as the mis-sioner of this d~votion, intended to point out to religious," that ’ He expected to find~ in them devotees of His Truth and dyrlamos bf His Love, He certainly, wl~ile giv.ing us cause for joy in such a. compli-ment, made it clear to all, that He felt greatly disappointed in His expectations. For in His fourth appearance to St. Margare~ Mary, He made this complaint to her, "Behgld this Heart which has so loved men that it has spared nol~hing but has been poured out .totally and has been consumed as a pro.of of its love; and for gratitude, I receive from the greater part of men only ingratitude by their acts of irreverence and by the coldness, and the conte.mpt they ha~’e for Me in this sacrament of Love. But what touches roe closest is that the very hearts which are consecrated to roe act thus." It is a smarting, rebuke; it stings to the quick .the’person conse-crated to Jesus Christ. And each of us, if I’ may dare to spdak for each; may strike his breast humbly confessing With th’e publican, "’Lord be merciful to me’a sinner." Yet this is not a reason for dis- .couragement. While we are aware that the Sacred Heart,expects to find in His chosen soflls a cradle for the growth and a beacon for the shining of’His love, we, mindful of our emptiness, may take to heart th~ese other words to St. Margaret Mary, "And for the accomplish-ment of this ~reat design, I have chosen you as an abyss of u~awortbi-nes~ and ignorance, in order that all should be wrought by Me." If. we can do nothing else,, we can,with divine grace, try to see ourselves as we are and gladly permit the Sacred Heart to inflame our souls. with His divine Love and to radiate through them into the minds and hearts of men too easily forgetful, amid their works and worries, of His Divine Presence. If we open our hearts to Him, the Sacred Heart will do the Jest; if we do this little, we shall do much. "Amen I say to you this poor widow has put in more than all those who bav~ been putting money into the treasury..For they all have put in out of their abundance; but she ,out of her want’ has put in all that she badd’ (.Mark 12:43.) OUR CONTRIBUTORS MICHAEL J. LAPIERRE. a new contributor, writes from the ,Jesuit Seminary, Toronto, Ontario. AUGUSTINE (3. ELLARD, professor of ascetical and mystical the, ology, and EVERETT 3. MIBACH, a, former missionary from China, are at St., Mary’s College, St. Marys, Kansas. dOHN A. HARDON teaches ,fundamentai theology at West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana. dOSEPH F. GAL-LEN, who teaches Canon Law at Woodstock College, Woodstock, Maryland, con-. dudes his series on the Quinquennial Report in this issue. 150 The, Qu!nquennial .Report: Obligatiohs and Directives !11. Joseph F. Gallen, S.J. ¯ " IX. A~breuiating and Prolonging the l~ostutanc~ . t!~iVi~.AS th6 time assigned by. the common law (c. 539) or by W’ the Constitutions for the postulantship abbreviated or prolbnged: if so. for bow long a time and by what authority?" Pontifical. 147: Diocesan, 134: Independent Monas-teries. 74. " The law of the Code demands the postulancy only for li.~eity and not for the validity of either the noviceship or the professions. By the common law of the Church the postulancy is demanded only. in ins{~tutes of perpetual vows. in which all religious women but in institutes of men only-the lay brothers are obliged to make a postu-lancy of six months. The particular constitutions may and fre-quently do prescribe postulancy in institutes of perpetual vows for the classes of religious not obliged to the postulancy of the Code. for example, teaching brothers. The constitutions may also prdscribe a postulancy longer than six months. This is rare.ly done. Thus one congregation, whose constitutions were approved by" the Holy See in 1937, has a postulancy of a yea.r. This postulancy can be prolonged for six months. The noviceship in t, his institute- is two years in duration. Another institute has a postulancy of nine months, but it can be pro.10nged for only three months. The duration of the postulancy prescribed by canon law is com-puted in the same way as the.canon’ical year of noviceship. Therefore, a pgstulanc.y of six months that begins on 3anuary 1 ends and the noviceship may be begun on July 2. Any considerable abbreviation of the postulancy is .forbidden. However. rgligious superiors may for a jUSt reason abbreviate the postulancy, for a few days. The usual reason will be that all the postulants of a group may receive the l~abit and be~in the noviceship on the same day. It is d.ifficult t6 see how th~s abbreviation permitted to religious superiors can be longer tl4an two weeks. For a more extended abbreviation recourse is to be made to the. APOstolic Delegate.. Higbe( superiors also have the right ofprolonging the postulancy but not be~rond six months.. Here ai~o an extension.of a ~ew d. ays 151 JOSEPH F. GAL~LEN Reviet~’for°Religi~u~ m’ay be-made that all the p0s~ul~nt~ 0f a gro, up may b~egin’ the novice-. ship ~n the.same day. Outside of this case I believe that the reasons for a prolongation, of the postulancy-must be peculiar to an indi- ~’i~tua!, and the reason will ~ractically alwaysbe a doubt of the suit-. ability of the postulant for admission to the noviceship. ~ greater .- liberty is permitted to the higher’superiors .it the constitutions pre-scribe a duration of, "at least six months." However, When the con-stitutions enact precisely that. "the prescribed time of the postu-fancy is six months," I believe ii is illicit to exte’hd l~he posttilancy annually and.for all postulants ~o nine months or more, for ~xample, that all may. complete a scholastic year ,of studies during the postu-° lancy. A law whose observance is cominonly and.habitually not en-forced is an anomaly. A human law admits an excuse and dispensa- . tions in parti~ula, r cases, but piesumably a law tends to l~he Common good and is therefore to be at least commonly observed. The H01y See in approving constitutions, is now wont to insist that the dura-tion be stated as-six months and riot for at least six ~nonths. This is an md~cat~on that the Holy See does not, wish the-duration of the postulancy to be ,cornpietely under (he" contiol of higher.super!ors. Another indication of the mind Of the Holy See is that.the Norma~ of 19~1 permitted a prolongation only in’ particula, r cases)s Fur-thermore, the prolongation of a determined postulancy, even in an individual case, for thesake of siudids seems to me to b6 beyo~nd th~ power.0f prolongation granted bythe Code to higher supe[iors. believe it is~the implicit intention of the Code that the reason for the pr01’ongation should be a doubt as to the postulant’s suitability for admission to the novic~ship: It is not to be forgotten that a postu-’ lant who has satisfac~torily completed the time of a determined postulancy has ~ulfilled all the donditions demanded from.him by law for admission to the noviceship. Is it like’ly, that highel superiors are acting legitimately in postponing that admission? An extension of the postulancy ’for studies in’the case ofeither an individual or a group demands a dispensation from,the competent authority. If the higher superiors of an institute inten,d to make such. an extension a .Pe[mandnt practice, they should give" thought to ~’change. in this article of the cbnstitutionsl We then have the anomaly of a law that no one obsdrves .or dntexids to observe. Not all canonists will agree with these interi~retations. Thd Apostolic Ddlegate,has the faculty of abbreviating or prolo.n’ging,thi postulancy prescribed by the Cod~. ~SNormae Secundum Quas S. Congr. Episcoporum et Regularium Procedere Solet in Approbandis novis Institutis Votorum Siraplicium, 28 iun. 1901, n. 65. 152 . May’~ 1952 "QUINQUENNIAL REPORT It is certainly; illici~ to -prolong the noviceship o for ,the" sake ,of studiets. Canoii 571, § 2 explicitly demands a doubt of the suitabil-ity of the novice "for" profession as the reason fora prolongation, of the novlceship. It is equally illicit, without an induh from the Holy See, to transfer the canonical..year to the second year.of no~riceship for th~ sake of studies. ’" The, adtual cases discussed above are indications of a ~ider and more serious problem that should be faced by many cong~egatio.ns.of brothers and sisters, that is, are’they unv~isely lessening the period of,’ spiritual form~ation for the sake.bf~ a more rapid,intellectual training? Cahon lair does not forbid a’fo~mal and intensive course of ~tfidies during the postulancy and the ~econd y~ar of noviceship, but it.would b~ very imprudent.to assume that every~hihg not forbi.dden by posi-tive law is by t, hat. v, ery fact praiseworthy. The Code-also does not, command nor recommend ~uch a course and it implicitly forbids a -course that destro~rs or seriously impedesthe p.rimary purpose Of the pqstula~y and, especially.of the second year. of noviceship. It can be doubted that a~full college ,course is compatible with the intensive dedication to sp, irit-uaYthings that i~ ~the primary purpose also of the second year of noviceship. It see~as strange that this.year of novice-ship: which has been introduced by some institutes to)give a deeper spiritual formation, should l~e so ~ompletely de;coted to s, tudies. Con-gregations of brothers and sisters should sincerely face a. very impor-tan. t question: has the, factual system of only one yea’r Of inten~iv~ spiritual formation’ produced satisfadtory resufts? .... X, Poverty ’-’Is a perfect-.common life acc6rding to c. 594-. the RUI~ and the C0nstltut~ons, observed everywhere, but ~specialIy .in novitiates and house~ of studies ~(cc. 554 § 3:587 § 2)? "W..hat has beeh done’ and-is being donne positively. to’safeguard andpromote .,th~ vibtue ~and sp)rit 9f poverty ? "Do Superiors and officials, out of, religious charity and in order to ward off. for. the religious o.cc’asions, of .sinning against pgverty, provide within the limits of poverty, "wha~ is necessary and appro-priate, in the’way df food, clothes and~othe~ things? " "Do they allow the religious to ask for or receive these.. ihings from externs ? "Are there complaints about these things; are these complaints seriously considered, and are a~uses on the part of Superiors and sub-° jects alike’corrected with, equa! severity?’’~. Pontifical, 206-210: Di- 153 JOSEPH F: GALLEN " Reoieu; f,o’r Rdigioua" ocesan, 189-193: Independent Monasteri_ed, 117-120. . Poverty in all its aspects of the vow. of law, especially of com-mon life, and ot~ Spirit has been repeatedly emphasizedand explained in the REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS. This policy is, only. an imitation of ,that of the .Church and is sanctioned by the experience and wisdom of the ages, which have always seen the deterioration of religious in-stitutes forewarned by the symptom of ’a weakene.d poveriy. It is most interesting to note that only 6ne’of the que.s.tions listed ¯ above, and that only partially, the third question, directly touches the vow of p.overty One is on the spiri~ of poverty, tiredall the other four are on the laws of common life. The great.source, of abuses in poverty is in the neglect of the laws on common life. Since so much has been written on poverty in this REVIEW, it will suffice to underline again the matter of the fourth question, "Do they allow the re.ligious to ask for or receive these,things from externs?" ¯ The law on common life on this point prescribes ,that religious should at least habitdall~ and ordinarily procure their, material neces-sities from their own institute. This law does not forbid a religious from receiving an occasional and exceptional free gift of such a neces-sity, provided this is done with permission, .the proprietorship apper~ tains to the institute, and the quantity¯and quality do not exceed what would have been given by the institute. The reasonableness of this law is evident. No spiritually sanereligious will.hold that the "degrees’of pove.rty are proportioned to the wealth of our families and friends.¯ ¯However, it is not unthinkable that some superiors have given permission for such things as vacations, vacanons at home, -trips, and courses of studies, "’provided ~l?u get the. money.’" An ancient law of the Church commanded that a monk who was found at death in possession of a notable¯ amount of money should be buried outside ihe .monastery, in a dunghill as a sign~ of perdition, and that his money should be buried with him. We can be assured that this law has been abrogated: it belongs to the ages~of mote masctiline and prlm~tlve penance¯ We can, however, neglect the ~sperity but lmltat.e the vigor of this law by burying in oblivion that ill-sounding per- .mission: "You may do it, provided~dou get the"roone~j." XI9 Vacations at Home andoutside the Institute "Is it allowed by reason or under color, of a vacation, that time b~ spent with one’s parent,s or outside a house.of the Institute?" Pontifical, 2~4; Diocesan, 244. ¯ The implication of this question is not to deny a vacation to reli- Mag, 195Z QUINQUENNIAI~ ]:~EPORT gious. It can even be doubted that the summer program, of many religigus permits, the vacation they should have and need. Canon 606 § 2 forbids religious superigrs to permit rtheir subjects to live outside a house of-’their own’institute except for a serious reason and for as brief a period of time as possible. The pro, per place, therefore[ for.the rest- that religious, need is a vacation house of the institute it-self. Prudence more than commends the principle that r~ligioils should work for seculars but.relax wi~h their own. We can detect in the question quoted abovea fr6wn and perhaps the beginning of ascowl at vacations at home and outside the insti-tute. The same lack of merriment had been noticeable in the writings of canoni~ts. Father Creusen, S.J., had written: "The constitutions which permit’ the. spending of vacations With one’s fdinily are not. ocleaHyabrogated by this canon (can. 606, § 2)."19 The most ben!gn interpretation .could not construe these words as laudatory. The same author had also stated: "Although a certain amount ofstrictness in. forbidding visits to one’s, family may at first stir up. ~ome resistance on the part of.relatives, it is usually a source of great edification, pre- .,serves religi6us from numerot~s, imperfections and faults, and draws to the institute souls desirous of a truly interior life.’’20 In this strict-ness he was s.upported by Bastien.21 ¯ Three most repiatable canonistsl Vermeersch,’22 Coronata?3 and De Mees~er24 hre even stricter. They hold that vacations at home are in themselves~’foreign to the religious state but the difficulty of abolishing the practice is a just reason for tolerating a very brief.absence of this kind. This question of the. Holy See can lead us to a more sincere and prayerful study of the text: "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother .... he cannot be my disciple." All religious know that these wdrd~ dan be interpreted too harshly; not all are equally aware, that they can be interpreted too s6ffly. Vacati6ns at home and outside the in-stitute ase forbidden by the law of common life if they ar~ given only to those who can secure the money, from their families or friends. XII. Work and t.be Spiritual Life . "DoSuperiors carefully see to it that. {he work of teaching be pr6perly harmonized with religioudsls "ciphne? Pontifical, 303 ; Diocesan, ~283. ~gCreusen-Ellis, R61igious Men and Women in the Code, n. 292, 3. 20Creusen-Ellis, ibid., n. 29f, 2. "- 2~Bastien, Directoire Canonique, n. 592, 4. 22Vermeer¢ch-Creusen, Epitome Iuris Canonici, I, n. 763,~ 1. 23Coronata, Institutiones Iuris C~nonici, I, n. 612. ?4Br~s, Juris Canonici Compendium, I, n. 661. 155 ’,JoSePH F. GALLEN. ¯ " :Re~vie~w for Religtous. ’The aspect, of work that causes the most exte’nsiye, practical ob- , stacle to religious disc.ipline-is 6verwork~. The dail¢, teaching sched~- ule of brothem and sisters in "parochial ,and high., sc~hgols is sufficient labor in itself. ~,Vhen extracurrici~lar and parish activities andworks, ¯ extension and’ summer cburses, vacation schools, and domestic duties in the ~eligious house are added, the burden .is more tl~an intolerable and will leave.°very little energy and even time for the spiritu~l life. Som~ Bishops in their didcesan statutes touch this. very pr~a~ical matterof work’incompatibie with the life and duties of sisters. ,The statutes of C~66kston0 enunciate the basic prificiple-very clearly: :’Neither ~ill SiSters. be permitted to do any church or parish work ~- without the permission of, the Bishop. Let i~ be borne in mind that their fieed all time possible to perfect themselves in their sa~red pro.’- fession of teaching, nursing, and caring for orphans, apart’ from thei~ ~eligio~s exercises and necessary relaxation.’’2s~ Th~ .wording of this law would exclude all housework, all duties of clerks and stenogra-phers in the .rect~ory, and also the. position of sacristan ifi parish ~hurches. Thediocese of Richm6fid affirms more briefly the sa~e principle as that contained in,.the. Crook;ton legis.lation.26 The’ . Pitts.burgh statutes" forbid a sister, wi.thout the, perm.issibn of the. Bishop, to be a sacristan, jan.itress, or to do any servile work in s~ic~ risties, sanctuaries, orchurches.2~ The statutes of Cincinnati also forbid sisters’ to be sa~’ristans in parish chfirches.28 A very conspicuous source of work that interferes with the reli-gious life and with teaching in institutes.of religious women is the addicti6n to domestic duties. The lustre of. flobr and furnitu?e ~ shou.ld not,be ranked as the primar.y purpose of a convent. It is hardly reasonabl~ to dust the dustless or to polish" the lustrgus.. The r~ligious teacher in her free., moments shotild naturalist gravitate to prayer, study, and readi~ag, but it.is not an exaggeration to state that ~n s0me.institutes of religious women .domestic duties are very apt to exclude free moments and toconsume free moments. .The time as-si~ g~{ed to prep’aration for class endangers good teaching and excludes progress in knowledge. The excessive occupation in manual work can be rooted blindly ~in°the traditions and training of the particular institute. It. begiiis in the post,ulancy and novicesh, ip. Many a young ¯ girl enters religion thirsting for sanctity but she soon acquires a spir- 2SCrookstdn, p’. 26. 26Richmond, ~n. 188. 2vPit.tsburgh, n. 64. 28Cincinnati. p, 82. 156 May, 1952"J ’, QUINQUENNIAL REPORT itual throat that is forever parched b~" a. riovi~eship spent i_na.laundry, Safictit9 is not encouraged¯ when (l~e greatest emphasis and praise is given, to th~ accomplishme.nt of the dustless floor,’ the gleaming chair, and to skill in 6perating a dishwashir~g machine. An institute of religious women can not only ~blind but als0 cheat itself. It can be, conten~ with a mere legalistic observance of the laws on the (anonical year. The ¯postulants and isecohd~year novices are v~ithout scrfi°ple .completely occupied in studies. ,The canonical novices are kept With-. in the novitiate, but ~lSe.y are employed for half¯ the week in ~a l~iundry or in similar dombstic duties andothey receive very litt’le instruction. The net result is a savin~ df expense andl the p.roduction of pc~orly trained religious. The’Cash balance is "in the bl~ick," but the human balance is-"in the. red." , Materi.al debts ar~ a heavy bhrden to r~li- ~ious institutes but they are ultimateIy paid. " A great, practical truth that ~eligi~us institutes should never, forget, is that human liabilities are on our books until their death. Higher superiors should sincerely arid ¯conscientiously reflect on the. constant principle of ~he Holy See in appro~ving constitutions that novices may not be employed in do- " mestic duties toan extent that interferes with. the prescribed’ exercises’ of the novic~eship. A primary obligatibn-of every’higher superior is the proper training of’ the .postulants and novices. XIII. Communication o~ the Pro~essed with ihe Novices . ¯ ~’Are the novices, according to law.and the Constitutions. kept separate from the professed, and is any undue communication be-tween them tolerated (c. 564. §§~1, 2)?’-’ Pontifical. 1-66; Diocesan. 153; Ind.ependentMon~s.teries, 87. Ihdependent monasteries and, religious °houses are l~ractically;con- .fined to orders of nuns. So~me of the questions proposed to the’se in-stitutes.’ such as the difficultie~ experienced in the observahce of cloi-ster and the ability of the monastery to ha~ecompetent officials for the various posts of government, religious formation, and ~vcork are of general interest. H6wever. these matters now appertain more to a study of the apostoli~ Constitution "Spobsa Christi. Canon law forbids communication between the professed and the novices in all institutes, and one of’the ques, tion.s, proposed.also to independent monasteries, asks whether this law has been observed. A, professed in the sense of the Code is one who has made at least the first_religious,profession.’ The professed .of ~,tern~.porary vows, eyen’ , though they may be called .novices" in some instituters, 0canonically a~e not nowces but professed rehgmus. They are therefore ~forbidden to 157 JOSEPH F. GALLEN RevieW’for Religio~s. have communication with the novices. It will be interesting to see what the Sacred Congregation will do about ~he usage that is found, e~pecially in independent mon0steries, of treating th~ professed of temporary v:ows as novices and of keeping them with the novices for the entire period of temporary profession. TEN’YEAR INDEX--NOW AVAILABLE ’ The Teri-Year Index of the REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS (1942~ 1951) is now,available. It is a green-covered booklet of sixty-four pages including a general index with a.n integrated listing of all ar-ti’cles, authqrs, editorial comments, questions, and answers, communi.- cations, decisions of the Holy See and other items of interest to reli-gious, and a separate index of all books reviewed and noticed. The engries in the content index have been grouped according to subject matter, for instance, admission to religious life, beatifications’, con-fession, indulgences, mariology, novitiate, . poverty, vocations, vows, and the like. All the articles of an autho’r are listed beneath his name. We appreciate the ~nerous response we have already received and. the encouraging ~omments. Kindly do not ask us to bill you. The, cost is one dollar per copy. Pleas4 send the money with the order to REVIEW F~)R RELIGIOUS, St. Mary’s College, St. Mar, ys, Kansas. UNIOUE SCHOLARSHIP The "Walter Springs Memorial S~holarsl~ip," "at-Regis College, Denver, seems to be something truly unique. Walter Springs, a Negro student .of the early 1940’s[ died a victim of race prejudice while in the armed forces in thi~ country. While at Regi~ he was a good student, a splendid athlete, very popular with the st_u’dent body. He was a convert, baptized in the Regis chapel. Some of his classmates .recently decided to perpetuate his memory with a s~holarship--~ *dual scholarship which each year will take care of one Negro student and on4 white student, "s~pplying each with books, tuition, board and room, and whatever other expenses are neces- PLUS Xll ON THE RELIGIOUS LIFE An English translation’of the address of the H’oly Father.to the First Congress of Religious at Rome, December 8, 1950; which was summarized by Father De Letter, .S.3.; in his article, "Contemporary Depreciation of the Religious Lif~" .(R.EVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS, 3anuary; 1952), is given in the April, 1952,-number of Life of the Spirit. This magazine can be obtained from Blackfriars. Publications,~ 34 Bloomsbury Str~’et, London, W. C. 1,.England. . ¯ .158 .Ques!:ions andAnswers Our chapter has voted ÷hat we should now fake solemn vows accord-’ ing’÷o ÷he prescriptions of "Spo~sa Christi." Are ~he minority wh~ did not wish ÷o assume ÷his privilege bouffd to fake solemn vows with ~’he rest? ¯ Similarly, are ÷he lay Sis÷ers wffh perpetual vows, ~s well as ÷hecholr Sis-ter~ wi÷h ÷empor~ry vows who h~d no p~r÷ in the election, bound .~’o ~÷~ke solemn vows, or m~y provisions be mede for those who prefer if, to con-tinue ~ith dmple vows? Fi"rst. it may b.e~ well to call a’ttention to the text o~ the general statutes of the Apostolic Constitution. "Sponsa Christi." Article 3. § 2: "All.[monasteries in which 0nly simple.vows are taken can ob-tain a r~storation o~ solemn vows. Ifideed, unless trul~ grave reasons prevent it, tl~e~ will be solicitous about tal~ing, them again." These words do not contain a permission to take solemn vows without more ado, but theF extend an ~nwtanon to such communities to re-quest the ~avor ~rom’the ~oly See through the’ Sacred Congregation o£ Religious. Naturally, tb~ first step will be to ~nd out the ff~ind o~ the communitF by a vote o~ the chapter, I~ that proves ~avorable. then a petition should be sent to the Hol~ See through.the local’or-dina~ y of the monastery, requesting permission to take solemn vows. The permission is granted under the ~ollowing conditions, taken ~rom a recent decree to that effect: 1. "In the a~oresaid monasterF, the nuns, °having first made temporar~ vows according to the norm 8~ canon 574. may take s~olemn, vows. 2. "The papal, cloister, as prescribed by the Code o~ Canon Law and by the Apostolic Constitution ’Sponsa Christi’ and the In-struction of the Sacred Congreganon o~ Religious ’Inter. Praeclara’ (ofNovember 23; 1950), should be observed. 3. "When all these circtlmstances have been provided for, the local ordinary, either personall~ or through a delegate, can in the name o~ the HolySee receive the solemn vows o~ the superior o~ the m0naster~; she, in turn,..can recmve the solemn pro~ession o~ the otbe~ nuns, provided they have.been professed for at least three,years.’ 4. "If any of the present membdrs of the community wish not [to oblige themselves by sdlemn yowls.,, they are free to ’remain v~ith simple vows, but they must realize that they are nevertheless bound 159 QUE.STIONS AND AI~SWERS .. . Reuieu.; [or Religio/us to a strict observance of all the lhws of papal cloister. 5. "Extern Sisters, having completed their period of ter~porary vows, are tc~ be admit’ted 6nly to simple perpetual vows. 6. "Finally, it is committed to N.N. (the local ordinary) to p~blish, this decree in the monastery of N.N. once he is certain that the required conditions have beew fulfilled. A document attesting -to the publication "a~nd execution of this decree is to be_preserved in . the archives of’ the monastery, and a copy of that document is tO be sent to this Sacred Congregation." No comment is needed since the document Sl~eaks for itself, We maynote, however, that the opening~words of n. 4: "if any of the present, members of. the community." seem to imply~ tha~ all futu’re members will be obliged to take solemn vows. " A religic~us who is suffering f~om. gastric, ulcers must ~’ake medicine during the nlght~ How can he oBtaln’a dlsp~ehsafio~ from the ,eucharistic fast so that he mayreceive H City of Saint Louis (Mo.), http://www.geonames.org/4407084 http://cdm17321.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/rfr/id/214

Review for Religious - Issue 11.3 (May 1952)

Similar Items