Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959)
Issue 18.1 of the Review for Religious, 1959.
में बचाया:
| मुख्य लेखक: | |
|---|---|
| स्वरूप: | Online |
| भाषा: | eng |
| प्रकाशित: |
Saint Louis University Libraries Digitization Center
1959
|
| ऑनलाइन पहुंच: | http://cdm17321.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/rfr/id/438 |
| टैग : |
टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!
|
| id |
sluoai_rfr-438 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Saint Louis University |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus |
| spellingShingle |
Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) |
| author_facet |
Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus |
| author_sort |
Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus |
| title |
Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) |
| title_short |
Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) |
| title_full |
Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) |
| title_fullStr |
Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) |
| title_sort |
review for religious - issue 18.1 (january 1959) |
| description |
Issue 18.1 of the Review for Religious, 1959. |
| publisher |
Saint Louis University Libraries Digitization Center |
| publishDate |
1959 |
| url |
http://cdm17321.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/rfr/id/438 |
| _version_ |
1798403613278601216 |
| spelling |
sluoai_rfr-438 Review for Religious - Issue 18.1 (January 1959) Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus Jesuits -- Periodicals; Monasticism and religious orders -- Periodicals. Issue 18.1 of the Review for Religious, 1959. 1959-01-15 2012-05 PDF RfR.18.1.1959.pdf rfr-1950 BX2400 .R4 Copyright U.S. Central and Southern Province, Society of Jesus. Permission is hereby granted to copy and distribute individual articles for personal, classroom, or workshop use. Please credit Review for Religious and reference the volume, issue, and page number and cite Saint Louis University Libraries as the host of the digital collection. Saint Louis University Libraries Digitization Center text eng Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus A.M.D.G. Review for Religious JANUARY 15, 1959 Cloistered Contemplatives .......... Plus XII Keeping the Rules ............ p. DeLetter Mental Illness Among Religious . . . Ricl~arg P. Vaugl~an Christ and the Supernatural Life . Daniel ,J. M~ Callahan Book Reviews :(~.uestio~s and Answers Delayed Vocations Roman Documents about: China Sacred Music and the Liturgy VOLUME 18 NUMBER REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS VOLUME 18 JANUARY, 1959 NUI~IBER 1 CONTENTS EDITORIAL NOTE ........................................ 3 PIUS XII’S ALLOCUTION TO CLOISTERED CONTEMPLATIVES~ Translated by Frank C. Brennan, S.J ........................ 4 KEEPING THE RULES~P. DeL~tter, S.J ..................... 13 OUR CONTRIBUTORS ............. i ....................... 24 DELAYED VOCATIONS .................................... 24 SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS AMONG RELIGIOUS-- Richard P. Vaughan, s.J ................................... 25 COMMUNICATIONS ...................................... 36 CHRIST THE AUTHOR AND SOURCE OF THE SUPERNATURAL LIFE-- Daniel J. M. Callahan, s.J ............................ ~ ......37 SURVEY OF ROMAN DOCUMENTS~R. F. Smith, S.J ......... 42 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: 1. "Brain-washed" Religious ............... i~ ................. 49 2. Custom of General Permission for Christmas Gift.s ...........50 3. Is Permission All That Is Required in Poverty ................ 51 4. Changing the Constitutions on the Eucharistic Fast ............51 SOME BOOKS RECEIVED ................................... 52 SUMMER INSTITUTES .................................... 52 BOOK REVIEWS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS ................. 53 REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS, January, 1959. Vol. 18, No. 1. Published bi-monthly by The Queen’s Work, 3115 South Grand Boulevard, St. Louis 18, Missouri. Edited by the Jesuit Fathers of St. Mary’s College, St. Marys, Kansas, with ecclesiastical approval. Second class mail privilege authorized at St. Louis, Missouri. Copyright, 1958, by The Queen’s Work. Subscription price in U.S.A. and Canada: 3 dollars a year; 50 cents a copy. Printed in U.S.A. Editor: R. F. Smith, S.J. Associate Editors: Augustine G. Ellard, S.J.; Gerald Kelly, S.J.; Henry W’illmering, S.J. Assistant Editors: John E. Becker, S.J.; Robert F. W’eiss, S.J. Departmental Editors: Joseph F. Gallen, S.J.; E~arl A. Weis, S.J. Please send all renewals, new subscriptions, and business correspondence to: Review for Religious, 3115 South Grand Boulevard, St. Louis 18, Missouri. Please send all manuscripts and editorial correspondence to: Review for Religious, St. Mary’s College, St. Marys, Kansas. Review For Religious EDITOR R. F. Smith, S.J. ASSOCIATE EDITORS Augustine G. Pllard, S.J. Gerald Kelly, S.J. Nenry Willmering, S.d. ASSISTANT EDITORS John E. Becker, S.J. Robert F. Weiss, S.J. DEPARTMENTAL EDITORS Quest:ions and Answers-- Book Reviews-- Joseph P, Gallon, S.J. Earl A. Weis, S.J. Woodstock College West Baden College Woodstock, I~a~land West Baden Springs, Indiar~a Volume 18 1959 Editorial Office ST. MARY’S COLLEGE St:. Marys, Kansas Publisher THE QUEEN’S WORK St:. Louis, Missouri Published in January, March, May, July, September, November on the fifl;eenth of the month REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS is indexed in the CATHOLIC PERIODICAL INDEX EDITORIAL NOTE SEVENYETARES’ agEo inNJanuary, 1942, REVIEW FOR "RELIGIOUS published its first issue. The publication of that issue was due to the initiative of three men: Father Augustine G. Ellard, Father Adam C. Ellis, and Father Gerald Kelly, all of the Society of Jesus .and members of the teaching staff of St. Mary’s College, St. Marys, Kansas. As co-founders of the l/1WIE\\r, they also served as the editorial board for the new magazine, cbntinuing this to the° year 1955; ih that: year Father .Ellis, finding it necessary to curtail his work, withdrew from the editorial board of the I/ErIE\\;, being replaced by Father Henry Willmering, S.J. Now as REVIEW FOIl RELIGIOUS begins’its eighteenth’ ye.ar of publication, further editorial changes have been found advisable. H~nceforth the editorship of the REVIEW will be entrusted to an individual, assisted by associate, assistant, and departmental editors. On the occasion of /uch a cha~ge it is only" fitting that the new editor should express in a public way hi/ appreciation and his congratulations to the members of the former editorial board for the time and effort [vhich they generously gave to the I/EVlEW aid which made of it so successful a magazine. It is a matter of great satisfaction to him that the members of the former editorial board will remain as associate editors to gi.v.e the REVIEW the frdit of their knowledge and their long experience. It is also fitting on this occasion that a special word of thanks be given to Father Gerald Kelly. .For a long time the major part of the editorial work" of the Ill;VIEW has been borne by him; ¯ accordingly, to a large extent the. godd that the RF.VIEW has done is due to ¯his ufistilating’ ~fforts. From the rdaders of REVIEW FOIl RELIGIOUS the new editor seeks first of all prayers that the REVIEW in it~ future issues may continue to serve, religious as well as it has done in the past; .secgndly he requests suggestions for changes and improvements in the magazine. The Editor Plus XIl’s AIIocu ion I:o Clois!:ered Cont:emplat:ives Translat:ed by Frank C. Brennan, S.J. [The successive parts of this allocution, which will" be published in this and two following issues of the REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS, were broadcast by Plus XII on July 19, July 26, and August 2, 1958. The official text of the allocution is to be found in Acta Apostolicae Sedis (AAS), v. 50 (1958), pp. 562-86. All divisions and subtitles in the translation are also found in the official text.] GLADLY YIELDING to your many iequests, We are happy, beloved daughters, to address all the cloistered nuns of the Catholic world on the subject which is closest to their hearts: their vocation to the contemplative life. At times you have perhaps envied the joy of pilgrims who fill to overflowing the gre.at basilida of St. Peter and the audience chambers of the Vi~tican to assure Us of their pride in belonging to the Catholic Church and of their delight in welcoming the words of its universal head. At this time We are mindful- of your three thousand two hundred monasteries spread throughout the whole world and in each of them We visualize a recollected audience which, though silent and invisible, yet pulsates with the charity that unites you. How could you be absent from Our mind and Our heart--you who constitute a chosen group in the Church, called as you are to a more intimate participa-tion in the mystery of the redemption? Thus it is with all Our paternal affection that We wish you to preserve intact that religious life o~ yours which in its essential elements is identical for all of you but" whidh varies ~evertheless in accord-ance "with the inspiration of your different founders and according to the historical circumstances through which their work has lived. The canonical contemplative life is a path toward God, an ascent which is often rough and austere but in which the labor of each day, supported as it is by divine p~omises, is enlightened by the obscure yet certain possession of Him toward Whom you strive with all your strength. In order to CLOISTERED CONTEMPLATIVES respond better to your vocation, listen to Our message which will help you to understand it more, to love it~ with a purer and more generous love, and to realize it more perfectly in every detail of your lives. This ascent toward God is not the simple movement of inanimate creation, nor is it merely the impulse of beings who, endowed with reasofi, recognize God as their Creator and adore Him as the infiriite Being Who transcends immeas-urably all that is great and true and beautiful and good) It is more than the ascent of the ordinary Christian life, more even than the general tendency toward perfection’. It is an ideal of life, fixed by the laws of the Church, and for this reason called thecanonical contemplative life. Far from being restricted, however, to one rigidly determined form, it is of various types corresponding to the character and customs dis-tinctive of and proper to each of the various religious families such as the Carmelites, the Poor Clares, the Cistercians, the Carthusians, the Benedictines, the Dominicans, the Ursulines, and the Visitandines. This contemplative life; diversified as it is by the different religious orders and even within each of them by the subjects themselves, is a path toward God. God is the beginning and end of it; God it is who sustains its fervor and perva~es it entirely. PART I: KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTEMPLATIVE LIFE Knowledge of the Contemplative Life as a Way Leading to God "First of all, We wish to speak to you of the knowledge of the contemplative life as a way leading to God. In order to live out in its fullness the ideal which you propose to your-selves, it ;is important .that you know what you are and just What you are seeking to accomplish. The apostolic constitution Sponsa Christi of November I, 1950, includes in its first part’-’ a discussion of "virgins See the Vatican Council, Session III, Chapter 1; Denzinger n. 1782. 2AAS, v. 43 (1951), pp. 5-10. P~us,XII Review for Religious consecrated to God," as constituting a state of life which.has existed from the beginnings of Christianity down to the most recent, institutes of nuns. Without repeating what We there wrote, We’ call to your attention the advantag~ which you reap from a knowledge, at least in summary form, of the evolution of the religious life for women, and of the different forms it has taken throughout the ages. Thus .you~ will better appre-ciate the dignity of your state of life, as well as the originality of the order to which you belong and its bond with the whole Catholic tradition. General Principles Concerning the Nature of the Contemplative Life At this time We shall dwell only on those general prin-ciples which distinguish your life from that of others. For this purpose we have recourse to the sound and reliable teach-ing of St. Thomas. According to this master of Catholic theology, human activity can be distinguished into active and contemplative, jugt as the unde’rstanding, that uniquely human power, can be considered either as active or passive.’~ The human intellect is ordered either to the knowledge of truth-- and this is the work of the contemplative understanding, or to external action--and this is proper to the active or practical intellect. But the contemplative life, according to St. Thomas, far from being confined to a lifeless intellectualism or abstract speculation, also brings into play the heart and the affections. The reason for this he finds in the very nature" of man. Since it is the human will which impels the other human faculties to act, it is likewise the will which moves the intellect to operation. Now the will belongs to the domain of the affections; accordingly it is love which moves the under-standing in all of its acts, whether it be love of knowledge itself or love of the thing which is known. Citing a text St. Gregory, St. Thomas underlines the part played by the love of God in the contemplative life in the expression "... Summa Theologiae, 2-2, q. 179, a. 1 ad 2; a. 2 in c. January, 1959 CLOISTERED CONTEMPLATIVES in quantum scilicet aliquis ex dilectione Dei inardescit ad eius pulchritudinem conspiciendam" (in as far as one is inflamed by love of God to seek the contemplation of His beauty). The love of God which St. Thomas places at the very beginning of contemplation he also proposes as its final goal, for contemplation reaches its fullness in ’that joy and peace which the soul tastes when it possesses the beloved object of its search) Thus the contemplative life is completely permeated by divine charity which, inspires its very. first steps and rewards its efforts. The object of contemplation for St. Thomas, is prin-cipally divine truth, the final goal of human life. Contem-plation requires, as a necessary preparation, the , subject’s exercise of the moral virtues; and it is aided throughout its development by other acts of the understanding. Before arriv-ingat the end of its search, it is also aided by the visible works of creation which reflect invisible realities) But its ultimate perfection is achieved only in the contemplation of di, v.ine truth, the supeme beatitude of the human spirit." Misunder-standing, narrow mindedness, and. erroneous opinions will be avoided if in speaking of the contemplative life, care is taken to recall the Angelic Doctor’s teaching which We have just outlined in its essentials." The Nature of the Contemplative Life According to the Apostolic Constitution Sponsa Christi We must now determine the nature of the canonical contemplative life which you are leading. We take our defini-tion of it from the apostolic constitution Sponsa Christi, Article 2, parggraph 2: "On the general statutes of cloistered nuns." "By the canonical contemplative life we do not mean that interior, God-centered life to which all sbuls living in religion and even in the world are called and which each one can lead individually. Rather we mean the external profession of a Summa Theologiae, 2-2, q. 180, a. 1 iffc. 5See Rom. 1:20. Sumraa Theologiae, 2-2, q. 180, a. 4 in c. PIus XII Review for Religion,s religious life which, whether by cloister or by exercises of piety, of prayer, and of mortification, or finally by the labor which is requii:ed of the nuns, is so ordered to interior con-templation that the whole of life and every detail of it can and should be easily and efficaciously penetrated by the search after this contemplation.’’v Subsequent articles in the consti-tution single out other features in the canonical contemplative life for women. Among these are the solemn vows of religion, pontifical cloister, the divine o~ce, the autonomy of monas-teries, the federation and confederation of monasteries, monas-tic work, and .finally the apostolate. We do not propose to treat each of these points here but only to explain briefly the definition cited above. What the Contemplative Life is Not We shall first of all state what the canonical contempla-tive life is not. It is not, according to the constitution, "that interior, God-centered life to which all souls living in religion and’~even in the world are called and which each one can lead individually."s The constitution Sponsa Christi adds no further distinc-tion to this negative part of its definition. It makes it clearly understood that it will not discuss this aspect of the religious life and that it is not addressed to those who practice it exclu-sively. It further states that all are invited by Christ to this kind of life, even those who live in the world in whatever state of life, including that of marriage. But since the "apostolic constitution does not speak of this kind of contemplative life, We wish here to single out the existence of a contemplative life practiced in secret by a small number of persons who live in the world. In Our allocution of December 9, 19:57, to the Second International Congress of the States of Perfection,9 We said that there are today Christians "who, known to God alone, are engaging in the practice of the evangelical counsels AAS, v. 43 (1951), pp. 15-16. Ibid., p. 15. AAS, v. 50 (1958), pp. 34-43. Janl~ary, 1959 CLOISTERED CONTEMPLATIVES by private and secret vows, and are guided with respect to obedience and poverty by persons whom the Church has deemed fitted for this work and to whom she has entrusted the direction of others in the exercise of perfection." These people lead an authentic life of Christian perfection although it is outside any canonical form of the states of perfection. And We concluded this address by saying that "none of the elements which constitute Christian perfection is found want-ing among these men and women. They truly participate, therefore, in the life of perfection, even though they may not be engaged in any juridical or canonical state of perfection.’’~° We can repeat this statement now in connection with a type of life wherein one strives toward perfection by living a contempla-tive life and by the practice of the three vows of religion, but privately and independently of the canonical forms envisioned by the apostolic constitution Sponsa Christi. No doubt, the external conditions necessary for such a life are more diffi-cult to verify than those required for the active .life; but they can be met. Since these persons are not protected by any kind of canonical cloister, they practice solitude and recollection in a heroic manner. We find a good example of this in the Gospel of St.~’ Luke wl~ewree read of the prophetess Anna, a widow after seven years of marriage, who retired into the Temple wher~ she served the Lord night and day in prayer and fasting.’1 Such a private form of the con-templative life is not unknown in the Church, and the Church approves of it in principle. Primacy of Contemplation in the Canonical Conti~mplative Life The positive part of the definition given in paragraph 2 of the Constitution Sponsa Christi defines the canonical con-templative life as "the external profession of a religious life that is so ordered to interior contemplation that the whole of PIUS XII Review for Religious life and every detail of it can and should be easily and effica-ciously penetrated by the search after this contemplation." Among the prescriptions of religious discipline the text speci-fies cloister, exercises of piety, of prayer, of mortification, and finally the manual labor which is suitable for nuns. But these particulars are enumerated only as means of attaining the essential goal which is interior contemplation. What is first of all required of the nun is .that she so unite herself to God in prayer, meditation and ~ontemplation that. all herthoughts and actions be suffused with a realization of God’s pr.esence and be ordered to His service. If that should ever be lack-ing, the very soul of the contemplative life would be lacking, and no canonical pr~scription could supply it. The contem-plative life, to be sure, is not restricted exclusively to contem-plation. It includes many other elements, but contempla-tion does occupy the first place. We might go so far as to say that contemplation completely pervades the contempla-tive life, not in the sense that it prevents one from thinking of anything else or from doing other things, but in the sense that in the ultimate analysis it is contemplation that gives meaning, value, and orientation to the contemplative life. What we wish to emphasize with all Our authority is the preemi-nence of meditation and contemplation over every other path to perfection, over all practices and all forms of organiza-tion and federation. If you are not firmly anchored in God, if your mind is not continually returning to Him as to a pole of irresistible attraction, then it must be said of your con-templative life what St. Paul in his First Epistle to the Corin-thians said of certair~ Christians who overestimated the charis-’ matic gifts and failed to accord first place to charity: "If I have not charity, I am become as sounding brass or.a tinkling cymbal..... If I have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.’’1"~ It can rightly be said of a contemplative life without con-templation that "it profiteth nothing." 12 1 Cor. 13 : 1 and 3. 10 January, 1959 CLOISTERED CONTEMPLATIVES just as the human body in possession of all its organs but bereft of the soul. is not .a man, so all the rules and exer-cises of a religious order do .not constitute the’ contemplative life when contemplation itself, the vital principle, is absent, Formation of Religious in the contemplative Life If the~reti~al comments, such as the one We have just sketched," can help" to enrich .your.okn~wledge of the con-templati~, e life, ’certainly. the daily practice of your vocation brings, for its part, an abundant variety of lessons/For cen- ~ur~!~s hol~" women, ~hether they be Carmelites, Ben~edictines, Poor Clares, Dominicans, Ursulines, or Visitan-din. es, have reached a profound under.standing of the nature and of the requirements .of. the canonical contemplative life. From their very entrance intg" t.h.e .cloiste~r, candidates are taught the rules and the customs of their order; and this fo’rmation 6f mind and will which" is .begun in the novitiate continues ~throughOut their entire religious life. Such is the purpose of the instruction and spiritual direction given by superiors of the order br by the priests who are confessors, spiritual directors, and retreat masters. Usually nuns Who live according" to a ~listinctive .spirituality are directed by priests belonging to the masculine branch of their, order and there-fore possessing the s~me"spi~ituality. In addition, the Church h~ts throughout the ages cultivated the science of mystical theology which "has proved itself not only useful but ever~ necessary for the direction of c~ontemplatives. It gives proper orientation and renders signal service by ferreting out illu-sions and by distinguishing what is authentically supernatural from what is pathological., In this delicate field women them-selves have been of great service to theology and to directors of souls. ,It is enough to mention here. the writings of-the great St. Theresa of Avila who, as we know, when ther~ was question of settling difficult proble~ms of.the contemplative life,~ preferred the advice of an experienced theologian to that of a mystic who lacked clear and precise theological knowledge.. 11 P~us XII In order to deepen by daily practice your appreciation of. the contemplative life, it is important to remain receptive to the teaching that is provided, to welcome it with attention and with the desire of mastering it, each one according to her capacity and stage of development. It would be equally erroneous to let your aim be too high or too low, or to try following only one way identical for all, or to demand of all the same efforts. Superiors responsible for the formation of their subjects will know how to establish a just mean. They will not demand too much from the less gifted nor will they compel them to go beyond the limits of their abilities. Like-wise an Asian or an African will not be obliged to adopt religious attitudes that are natural for Europeans. A cultured and carefully’educated young girl will not be bound to a form of contemplation which is suited .to those who are less gifted.. At times the invectives of St. Paul against worldly wis-dom, found in his First Epistle to the Corinthians, are cited to thwart the legitimate desire of nuns wishing to reach a degree of contemplation in keeping with their abilities. These words of the Apostle are quoted to them: "We preach Christ crucified’’’~ and "I have desired to know nothing among you, except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.’’’4 But this is a mis-understanding of St. Paul, who intends to denounce the vain pretensions of human knowledge. The desire to have an ade-quate spiritual formation is not at all reprehensible nor in any way opposed to tha~ spirit of humility and self-denial which a sincere love of the cross of Chris~ demands. We here conclude, beloved daughters, the first part of our discussion; and We call down upon you the light of the Holy Spirit that He may help you to understand the splendor of your vocation and to live it Out in all its fullness. As a pledge of these divine favors, We impart to you with all Our heart Our paternal and apostolic benediction. I Cor. 1:23. Ibid., 2:2. 12 Keeping !:he Rules P. DeLel:t:er, S.J. IWILL BURST ASUNDER rather than transgress volun-tarily even the least order or regulation." Thus resolved the young Jesuit saint, John Berchmans. And the future apostle of the Sacred Heart, Blessed Claude de la Colombi~re, when in tertianship, took a vow to keep his rules according to a formula approved by his director. Both this resolve and this vow express an identical faith in the religious rules and a like love for them. Both John and Claude believed in their rules as the divinely intended way to holiness, and they loved them as directing their eager desirefor progress along the way of the divine will and good pleasure. This faith and this love led them to a grim determination of fidelity at any price. But they were saints! and of another time! Today, religi-ous are liable to take a different view of the practice of their rules. Modern people, it is ~aid, and particularly the young, loathe regulations and constraint. They dream of a free expan-sion of their personalities; they have greater faith in their own initiative and personal inventions than they have in external laws and rules. Not surprisingly, they sometimes lose their balance and incline to depreciate and neglect accepted ways and customsla one-sidedness that is not without risk and dan-ger. Religious today~ who once lived according to these ideas of the "world" and who continue to live and work in the midst of this world without being of it may well fail to keep immune from this dangerous stand concerning rules and regulations. Unless they shield themselves against influences from the world by prayer and reflection, they gradually fall victims to this sort of practical "modernism," both in their theoretical views of the rules and in their practical observance or non-observance of them. They do believe, no doubt, that it is their duty to keep the rules’, that. this fidelity is for them 13 P. DELETTER Review for Religious the safe way to sanctity and apostolic .fruitfulness traced out by unmistakable providential indications. But at times, particularly on busy days or at times of spiritual low ebb, they may feel perplexed about how to manage to keep all the rules. There are so many of them; it is scarcely possible to know and remem-ber, let alone to keep them! In those moments especially, the iriclination to depreciate and .neglect ’the rules is fanned by the breeze" that blows from the outside world into the precinct~ of the cloister. Unless they build up by prayer and meditation a firm motivation and an enlightened resolve to keep the rules, religious may unwittingly be contaminated by the modern dis-esteem for regulations. It may be well then to" ask ourselves: What do:we mean by keeping the rules? How shall we manage ifi practice? Why must we take the trouble? Rules of Two Kinds Among the religious rules which of themselves do not bind under sin--we leave aside the rules that determine the "matter of the vows and for that reason entail obligations under pain of sin--we should for our present purpose distinguish two cate-gories or kinds. There are the disciplinary’prescriptions which concern mainly external observances and community order. These aim in the first place at the common good of the insti-tute and the external discipline .of the religious communit~y. They impose on individual-religious, members of the community, some ways of speaking, acting, or dealing with people; an order of the day, times of silence and of talking, of work and rest or re.creation. They concern the religious as. members of the community .and .determine. their individual, contributions to the good of the community; they do not directly or primarily intend their personal spiritual profit, but only indirectly and consequently, ’to the extent that each individual religious cannot fail to profit by the regularity and’order’ of a community life in which these rules are properly kept and by the° personal sacrifices this "regularity demands of each of them. 14 Jan~ary~ 1959 KEEPING THE RULES There are also in the religious rules spiritual directives that propose to our endeavors ideals for the spiritual life and for the Work of the apostolate and the means to strive after them. These determine the particular spirit of each institute, its. form of spirituality, and its apostolate. They often explicitly state the proper virtue of the institute. They aim directly at the spiritual perfection of individual religious’ and at their spiritual apostolate, indirectly at ~he common spiritual good of the com-munity and the institute, since the fervor of a community and of an institute results from the spiritual and apostolic quality of its members. These rules prescribe and propose obligations that are more a matter of interior spirit than of external practice and, consequently, are less open to control and check than are disciplina.ry rules. It requires little reflection to see that keeping the rules means one thing with regard to the first category and another with regard to ’the second. Keeping Disciplinary Rules We keep disciplinary rules when we actually do what they prescribe, for example, keep silence, make a visit to the Blessed Sacrament, study, or follow the common exercises, and do not do what they forbid, for instance, not go out without due leave nor recreate outside the appointed time. This external fulfillment of the rule is an easy matter to control. We can easily know, and others too can see whether we do and omit what is expected of us. It may be well, however, to note that an occasional break-ing o~ a rule which is not frequent or habitual and happens out of human frailty and forgetfulness, however regrettable, need not and generally does not take away our real desire and resolve to keep the rules. Our fidelity remains intact even then, provided we endeavor to make good our neglect as far as we can and do penance for our transgression even on our own initiative and without awaiting official correction. These occa- 15 P. DELETTER Review for Religion,s sional failures generally imply, on the part of the religious, little guilt. They can and should be rather an occasion for humility and patience; never should they be a reason for open or hidden discouragement. They do not affect our fervor and, when taken humbly and patiently, can turn to greater spiritual good. Moreover, they gradually decrease in number and in guilt in the measure that our resolve of fidelity grows in intensity and we by practice acquire the habit of living according to the rules. Nor do these occasional lapses much affect the common good, which is the first purpose of disciplinary rules. They do not ruin the general discipline and regular observance. This regularity supposes that we habitually keep the rules and correct occasional failings. It does not demand of us the impossible ideal that human beings should as it were turn angels and be raised above all human frailty. It is a saint who said that the difference between a fervent and a lax community does not lie in this, that in the first no failings occur while in the second they do. No, failings happen in both; but in a fervent com-munity they are less frequent and are corrected, while in a lax community they go unpunished. On both counts, there-fore, that of the individual religious’s conscience and that of the good of the community, occasional breaking of disciplinary " rules need not label a religious or a community as guilty of infidelity to the rules. Only those religious must be said not to keep their rules who neglect them habitually or frequently, who care little and take little trouble to regulate their manner of living according to the rules. These, in spite of occasional fidelity {for they need not be violating the rules all the time), do not bring to the common observance the share they are expected to con-tribute. Their negligence does harm to the regularity of the community and to the common discipline. And they them-selves suffer spiritual harm from their neglect and unconcern about the common good. For though the breaking of rules is 16 January, 1959 KEEPING THE RULES not of itself a sinful transgression, .yet in the habitually negligent a sinful motive all too often prompts their manner of a~ting and turns their infidelity into sin. Actually, the habitual observance of disciplinary rules, for all its being mainly a matter of external conduct, is not well possible without an interior spirit. Whether we view it from the angle of the community or from that of the indi-vidual religious, in both respects it supposes an interior dis-position that prompts the external fulfillment. Regula¥ observ-ance is the contribution each religious is to make to the com-mon discipline and order; it must be prompted by the genuine and effective desire for the good of the community and of the other members. Then only can religious infuse a living soul into their habitual fidelity. Without this soul, that fidelity is precarious and liable to decay. And for the religious them-selv, es, fidelity to disciplinary rules, besides being the fulfill-ment of God’s express desire, is actually a practice of religious courtesy toward all members of the community. It demand~ that they inconvenience themselves in order not to inconveni-ence others. Seen in this ’light, it should not be difficult to say what is for every religious habitual fidelity to these disci-plinary rules. Following Spiritual Directives Less simple and definite is the idea of fidelity or infidelity to the rules that propose spiritual directives. This is not a matter of a mere yes or no. When religious rules prescribe humility or charity or right intention or a spirit of prayer, they do not just demand one or more definite acts, whether external or even purely internal. "They rather propose an ideal to be striven after; they demand an interior spirit that should animate our manner of living and our whole activity. Fidelity to these rules varies in perfection. All religious who are ever so little concerned to be what they are supposed to be may be said to keep these rules to some degree. But there are many degrees of fidelity, from" a minimum degree in the mediocre 17 P. DELETTER Review for Religion,s and tepid religious to an ever growing fidelity in the fervent who are keen on their spiritual progress. What these rules demand of religious may be reduced to two points..First of all, they require that religious wish to know and to grasp the ideal of spiritual and apostolic perfection propdr to their institute and the means it expects them to use for its realization. There are within Catholic spirituality different types of ascetical and apostolic ways. Some great schools of spirituality bear the name of a religious order, such as the Franciscan or Dominican or Benedictine schools. Actually it i’s normal that a religious institute develop its own form of spirituality and of apostolate and wish to see in its members, unifying possibly wide individual varieties, some common family traits. These are generally summed up in what we call the spirit of the institute--a phrase whose meaning is more easily sensed and graspe~l from actual experience of the religious life than expressed in definite concepts and words. It always designates the proper manner in which a religious institute strives after perfection and practices the apostolate. And we find it laid down in the set of rules which give the spiritual directives we are considering. A first duty of religious then is evidently to know, less perhaps in theory than in actual practice, the spirit of their institute and its particular type of spirituality and spiritual perfection. A second duty these rules impose on religious is that they should make the effort necessary to acquire the virtues that belong to their proper spirituality. This is an objective never fully achieved; there always remains room for further progress. Consequently, these rules demand of religious that they endeavor to progress in the virtues proper to their institute and at all times keep up this effort. There never is a moment when they can say they have done what they had to do. Keeping these rules is an ever-unfinished task. Nor is fidelity to these rules impaired when religious see their efforts apparently rewarded with scant or no success. It is not success ~hat the rules demand, 18 January, 1959 KEEPING THE RULES but the effort. All this goes to show that there can be many degrees in fidelity to these rules of spirituality. The more genuine one’s desire of perfection and apostolic usefulness, the more effective also grows this fidelity. On the other hand, infidelity in keeping these rules is no mere matter of saying no or of not doing. It is rather a question of a habitual disposition. Religiouswho do not care to know and to make their own the spirituality of their institute and who more or less deliberately warp their own outlook on the spiritual life and on the apostolate by adopting a spirit and ways tha~ are not in keeping with their vocation would evidently be unfaithful to these rules. It may be difficult to say definitely by what particular acts they break them, yet there is no doubt that these religious do not live up to the demands of their rules. Similarly, religious who would set aside the effort to put into practice, in the measure of the grace God deigns to give them, .the spiritual and apostolic ideal of their rules’ and institute would fail to keep these rules. Even without such wholesale defeatism or practical scepticism and indifference toward their ideal of spirituality, religious incline to abandon the directives of these rules when they relax their effort for progress and allow it gradually to dwindle to less and less. Low spiritual fervor means in practice a declining fidelity to these rules. Exceptions to the Rules From the above it should be clear what keeping the rules means in actual practice. One more point remains to be made which is not unimportant. There are, proverbially, exceptions to all rules, also to religious rules." There are cases in which it is right and lawful to act in .a manner which on the face of it looks like breaking the rules. (We have in mind here mainly the disciplinary rules.) The question is this. At times we hear it said that religious rules do not bind under sin in theory but that in practice breaking the rules will more often than not, if not always, be sinful because of the wrong motive that prompts the violation or because of the scandal that folldws from it~ 19 P1. DELETTER Review fo~" Religious This seems to be an overstatement. If it were correct as a general statement, then the intention of religious founders who expressly said that the rules of themselves do not bind under sin would be more nominal than real and would never materialize in concrete facts. Actually, practical experience of the religious life shows that there are cases, and they are not altogether excel~tional, in which there is no such sinful motive for an apparent breaking of rules nor any attending scandal. This happens whenever a sincere desire of greater good, especially spiritual, promp.~s a manner of acting which is not in material conformity with the letter of the ~ules. Charity for a fellow religious may require that we speak in time of silence. A too rigid application of the rule of not interfering in another’s office may preclude a useful and necessary help. In these and similar cases it is better to follow the spirit of the rule rather than its letter, for that is exactly what the exception comes to. Evidently, these cases are not of everyday or every-hour occurrence. The very approval of the religious rules by ecclesiastical authority is a guarantee that they are sufficently adapted to the common run of the religious life. Yet such situations are not so exceptional as hardly ever to arise. The reason for saying so is not mysterious. Religious legisl~ltors, as any other human lawgivers, are not in a position to foresee in detail ttie concrete and chang-ing circumstances in which their laws will have to be applied. They can foresee only the common and normal situations ,and legislate according to the general laws of human psychology and of Christian asceticism. Individual cases may arise--and in actual fact, all real cases are individual and not general--in which elements enter that no one could forecast and which may, as it were, reverse the whole situation in such manner that a material application of certain prescriptions would have the very opposite effect of what the legislator intended. In such cases it is clearly the spirit of the rule that one should follow. Then such exceptions merely confirm the rule. 20 January, 1959 KEEPING THE RULES In actual practice one should say that ordinarily the right thing for religious to do will be. to follow both the spirit and the letter of the rule, for generally these two do not clash. When, however, there is an opposition between them on account of special circumstances, then it is right to keep the spirit rather than the letter of the rules. But this manner of conduct supposes on the part of religious a thorough sincerity and purity of intention in desiring the greater good. Otherwise self-love too easily may blind them and turn this so-called sinless break-ing of a rule into a cloak for egoism and other unworthy motives. Breaking of Rules Besides these legitimate exceptions to the rules, there may be cases when it is not the desire to follow thdir spirit that prompts one.to :neglect them but a disordered.motive, such as laziness or selfishness or vanity. Must we say that such a breaking of disciplinary rules, which of themselves do not bind under gin, will always be sinful because of the disordered motive or because of the scandal following from the violation? The problem is delicate and difficult. It is delicate, for which religious will claim that he never breaks a rule out of more or less disorderly motives? Will he each time sin at least venially? It is difficult, because it involves the theological problem of positive imperfections. ,We do not wish to enter here upon a detailed discussion, but only to note that there are two opinions on the question. The more rigorous, and perhaps the more common, holds that the disorderly motives will always infect the violation of the rule in such manner as to make it sinful, at least venially. The more lenient opinion, and perhaps the more realistic, says that the disordered motive does not make a transgression of a rule sinful unless the rule binds under sin; the breaking of rules which do not bind under sin, such as disciplinary rules, even from a wrong motive, consti-tutes as such a positive imperfection. The two opinions also solve differently the question of scandal, supposing there was an occa- 21 P. DELETTER Review for Religious sion of scandal in the breaking of rules; the bad example may lead others to what is considered either as sinful or as a positive imperfection. Without definitely opting for one of these two opifiions, we may perhaps say this: for all practical purposes, the breakin~ of a disciplinary rule from a disordered motive will be sinful only when it would be sinful even supposing that there were no rule. Then the sinful motive clearly would make the action -or omission an act of selfishness or vanity or laziness. If this suggestion is acceptable, then we may say that in practice negli-gent or tepid religious, who care little about even deliberate venial sins and commit these rather frequently, may often be led by venially sinful motives when they break rules. Their breaking of rules more often than not may well be sinful.. But with religious who earnestly endeavor to live up to their ideal, it need not be so. They may happen to neglect a rule now and then even from a wrong motive, but this will be more a "failing" ~han a "transgression." Ii: need not be sinful. Despite their failings in externals, they may. not mean deliberately to-neglect the spirit of their rules. The Spirit of Our Observance The preceding remarks point to the importance of the spirit in which we keep our rules. This is in a way. more important than the material fidelity to their prescriptions. It is, moveover, the only guarantee, of steadiness and thoroughness in our regular observance. What we must come to is this: to see the rules not merely as restrictions to our liberty and initia-tive- they are this/ no doubt, to some extent; and to some modern eyes they show mainly this unappealing aspect--but first and foremost as helps to our weakness and generous good-will, helps which we need badly to shield us against our own inconstancy and passions and against seductive influences from outside." This is true of both kinds of rules we considered above. The regularity and order in the community which are the .fruit of common fidelity to disciplinary rules are a great help 22 January, 1959 KEEPING THE RULES to all its members for both spiritual and apostolic effectiveness. By keeping these rules we ourselves are helped, and w’e help others as well. And the spiritual directives of our rules show the safe way in which our effort i~or spiritual progress should push on. The rule guarantees the ever-necessary help of grace, for all religious at all times, receive the graces necessary to fulfill the duties of their state. And keeping the rules is one of the main duties of their state. Accordingly, the spirit that must guide our endeavor in keeping the rules is one of gratitude and love. It should not be one of fear and anxiety, not even fear of doing wrong. It is precisely, we are told, to do away with a spirit of fear that religious founders, and Holy Church after them, do not wish the rules to bind under sin." Fe~lr, moreover, does not lead to generosity; and without generosity who could actually keep the ruleS? It is gratitude for the help the rules afford us that should inspire our fidelity in keeping them--a gratitude shown less in words than in deeds, in the very deeds of our fidelity. It is above all love for Christ, whose call to perfection and to the apostolate we answered with the help of grace when we joined, the religious life, that must motivate our fidelity to the rules. Actually, this fidelity is nothing less than our continued answer to His call. For every day and every hour He beckons us to draw nearer to Him and to bring others with us, and He does so particularly through the. i, ery directives of our rules. To do what the rules prescribe is nothing else but love for Christ in deed. This spirit of love for Christ will silently and effectively show us how to manage concretely to keep Our rules in such manner that we, as it were, feel at ease and happy in the practice of this fidelity. It will not, evidently, do away with every constraint and every sacrifice. To toe the line always means restrictions on our inclinations and whims. But, for love of Christ, we can come to love this very self-denial demanded by 23 P. DELETTER fidelity to the rules, love it as the way in which we can show Christ the genuineness of our love for Him--and for His. Love gives new eyes to see. And when we have under-stood, as the Lord cannot fail to teach us, that we cannot love Him iti truth unless we also love our neighbor and Him in our neighbor, then we shall also find other reasons for keeping our rules, particularly those that concern the good of the community. Regular external observance, animated by a genuine interior spirit, is a dut~ and help we owe to all members of our com-munity. Each one of us is responsible for the influence he has in the community. Whether we think of it or not, whether we intend it or not, our very manner of l~eeping the rules makes fidelity to them either easier or harder for our fellow religious. If we truly love Christ, we shall’ not refuse Him the help He asks of us in our brethren, the help our regularity gives them in a silent but effective manner. He on His pare will not with-hold the help of His grace we need to be faithful. Thus keep-ing .the rules in union with our brethren we can steadily push on in the uphill climb to Christian perfection. OUR CONTRIBUTORS FRANK C. BRENNAN is stationed at St. Mary’s College, St. Marys, Kansas. P. DE LETTER is a member of the faculty of St. Mary’s Theological College, Kurseong N. E. Ry., India. RICHARD P. VAUGHAN, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of San Francisco and a staff member of the McAuley Clinic, St. Mary’s Hospital, is currently engaged in psychotherapy with religious men and women. DANIEL J. M. CALLAHAN is professor of asceticM and mystical theology at Woodstock College, Woodstock, Maryland. DELAYED VOCATIONS In several previous issues of RJ~\’~I~\V ~:()R .qEI.It~U)US (November, 1957, p. 342’; March, 1958, p. 90; and July, 1958, p. 193) informa-tion has been published on religi.ous communities which will accept women who wish to dedicate their lives to God but who are older than the usual age limit for admission. Two other groups have asked to be mentioned. One group is the Daughters of St. Francis. The members of this lay apostolate live a semi-community life, become members of (Continued on page 36) 24 Severe AAeni:al Illness Among Religious Richard P. Yauc~han, S.J. LIKE ANY OTHER sickness, mental and emotional ill-ness has a wide range of variation. This variation extends anywhere from the common phobia or irrational fear of dogs or cats to the debilitating disorder which causes the’ patient in the mental hospital to think that he is God. The minor manifestations of emotional disorder are more or less common in our civilization. They are accepted as inevitable parts of everyday living. There are few who do not have an occasional day when they seem to be more tense or anxious than usual, just as there are few who do not experience an occasional cold or upset stomach. Many refer to these bad days as times when their "nerves are .on edge." On these days their mental health is not perfect; but, on the other hand, they are far removed from serious mental illness. At the other end of the scale, there are those who are severely disturbed. In psychiatric language these people are usually described as psychotic. In times past, they were called insane. In any article dealing with the subject of serious mental illness, there always exists the potential danger that the reader will apply to himself or herself many of the symptoms which are described as typical of the psychotic and, as a result, come to the conclusion that he or she is severely disturbed. Hence, a word of caution to the reader is well in order. A serious mental disorder is both chronic and disabling. The psychotic is a person who carries truly debilitating symptoms with him month after month. This is what best distinguishes him from the average person who may occasionally have similar symptoms but whose symptoms are not chronic and severely handicapping over long periods of time. The ordinary person is able to cope with the symptoms that will be described during the course of 25 RICHARD P. VAUGHAN Review for Religious this article, should they occur. In spite of them, he is able to lead a fairly productive~ life. The psychotic collapses under the impact of his symptoms. As a result, he usually has little to offer the world and his fellow man. Characteristics of a Psychosis Perhaps the most significant quality of the psychotic is his reaction to the world in which he lives. As a general rule, he either has completely separated himself from reality or has drastically changed reality. Thus, it is not uncommon to find a psychotic experiencing hallucinations through which he is convinced that he sees the devil or hears the voice of the devil speaking to him. These hallucinations are as real to him, if not more real, than his dealing with his own family. Often it is following the advice given through the medium of a hallu-cination that leads the psychotic into some kind of anti-social behavior and eventually to commitment in a mental hospital. Other psychotics, beginning from ~/ false premise, develop a system of delusions through which they are convinced that mem-bers of their own families are spending most of their days and nights concocting new ways of persecuting them. These delu-sions are soreal to the psychotic that he sees no other alternative but to fight back so as to preserve his life and integrity. When severe mental illness has completely shattered the psychotic’s personality, it produces prolonged states of stupor which may on occasion be broken by some form of incoherent speech. As can easily be gathered, most psychotic conditions are extremely debilitating and handicapping. The majority of psychotics are unable to carry on everyday activities, especially those activities which involve relationships with others. Few can assume and maintain the responsibilities involved in holding~ down a position. The greater majority are confined to hospitals, at least during the active phases of their illness. One of the most distressing qualities of the psychotic is the lack of insight into the nature of his condition. He seldom realizes or appreciates the seriousness of his disorder. 26 January, 1959 SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS When he has hallucinations or delusions, he is firmly convinced that these phenomena are as true to reality as the fact that he is sitting in a chair before you. As a consequence of this convic-" tion, he builds many of his activities around these imagined events. This confusion of the imagined with the real not in-frequently makes him a menace to himself and others. The Psychotic Religious Since religious vocations are, for the most part, drawn from the same familial and environmental background that pro-duces psychotics among the laity, it should not be surprising that a certain small percentage of religious are afflicted with serious mental illness. Unfortunately, both the laity and i’eligious frequently are bewildered by the priest or sister who becomes psy-chotic~ This bewilderment can be attributed to two factors. The first is connected with "the humiliating symptoms of a psychosis. For this disorder strikesman’s highest faculty, namely his intel-lectual ability. It generally deprives him of his power to think and reason clearly. In many ways it reduces the sufferer to a state which appears to be less than human. To see a priest or a sister (a chosen soul of God) so afflicted and acting accord-ingly is a traumatic experience for the religious and lay person alike. The second reason for bewilderment rests upon a false conception of the_cause of mental illness. I.n spite of research data to the contrary, there still persists a vague suspicion that mental illness is in some way connected with a sinful life or at least that it cannot occur if a person is leading a truly holy life. A psychosis is a type of sickness, just as are ulcers of the stomach or cirrhosis of the liver. Whether the cause of the psychotic condition is psychological or organic or a combination of both (which is more likely) has not yet been established. "It can, however, safely be stated that a psychosis (with the exception, perhaps, of a condition brought on by alcoholism or drug addiction) is not the result of a sinful life. The idea that it is the effect of sin is simply, a remnant of past attitudes which still prevail from an era when little was known about 27 RICHARD P VAUGHAN Rewew for Rehgwus psychiatry and psydhology. The fact, therefore, that a religious person becomes psychotic does not in any way imply past moral indiscretions. Religious, even though they follow a more perfect way of life, are no more immune from severe mental illness than the average lay person. Prepsychotics and Religious Li~e Unfortunately, there are certain aspects of the religious life which attract individuals who have a tendency toward a very prevalent type of psychotic disorder. This disorder is called schizophrenia and accounts for a large portion of the psychotics in our nation. The schizoid personality and the incipient schizophrenic are characterized by withdrawal from social contacts and a love of solitude. Generally speaking, they also find considerable comfort in a highly routinized form of life. These are the seeming characteristics of the religious life which attract t~e incipient schizophrenic and lead him to believe that he has a vocation. Father T. V. Moore conducted a study: on the prevalence of mental illness among religious. After polling 93 percent of the state and private mental hospitals, he was able to determine the number of religious confined to these institutions. Through the use of the Catholic Directory, he was then able to establish the ra~io of mental illness among religious and compare this ratio with that of the general population. One of the most significant conclusions of this study was the high rate of schizo-phrenia among religious women, particularly among those who follow the contemplative life. From these findings Father Moore concluded that preschizophrenic women tend to gravi-tate toward the religious life as an escape from the hard reality of the world outside the cloister. Psychological Screening One of the major functions of a psychological screening program is to point out just such individuals. To allow an incipient schizophrenic to enter the religious life does a positive The American Ecclesiastical Re~ie~v, 95 (1936), 485-96. 28 January, 1959 SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS disservice both to the order or congregation and to the individual involved. Many a community has spent thousands of dollars for the hospitalization of a single psychoti~ member, and this at considerable sacrifice to the other members of the community. And then after all this expense, it not infrequently happens that the religious is finally d~agnosed as incurable. In such cases one might well ask whether such a diagnosis would have been r.eached if the psychotic religious had never been ~subj~cted to the strain and disillusionment of the religious life. Although personality evaluation through the medium of psychological testing and interview has proved useful, still it is a relativdly new pr6cess. Because this process is as yet in a developmental st~lge, it should be expected that for some time psychological screening will not be completely effective in fer-reting out those candidates who are incipient schizophrenics or who may become schizophrenic at some later date. Even with a greater understanding of the causes of mental illness and the development of more perfect screening devices, in all probability we will never reach that point where psychotic. disorders will be eliminated from the religious life. Charity, therefore, demands that we make an effort to understand the sufferings of our fellow religious who are afflicted with severe mental disorders, so that we can be more effective in bringing help and comfort to them. Schizophrenia As previously indicated, schizophrenia is the most preva-lent mental disease among both the laity and religious. It is the major mental health problem which faces our nation today. This particular type of psychosis, even in its incipient stages, is marked by a number of symptoms which seriously handicap community living. As a rule, the schizophrenic has consider-able difficulty adjusting to any situation which calls for social relationships. He is a person who has withdrawn from social contacts and lives within himself. He finds it almost impossibl~ to form any emotional response normally demanded by a close 29 RICHARD P. VAUGHAN Review ]or Religions friendship. Because he is convinced that others feel the same way about him as he feels about others, he spends most of his time by himself. He finds it difficult to talk to others. He has little to say. He absents himself from community recreations and will go to great lengths to avoid contact with other mem-bers of the community. Aside from this withdrawal symptom, he will sometimes make use of odd behavior which marks him out as different from the rest of the community. It is this behavior which is usually a prelude to the final breakdown. He may become re-bellious and rude toward superiors or develop unusual habits of dress and eating. It is usually such behavior, coupled with the increasing, withdrawal from community life, that calls a superior’s attention to the fact that all is not right with a particular subject. When schizophrenia takes control of the various human powers, a marked deterioration becomes quite noticeable. The schizophrenic religious will often manifest an abnormal interest ¯ in abstract and philosophical thought, but the conclusions from his thinking will not follow the rules of logic. He may even lapse into heretical positions as a result of his faulty thinking processes. The part of his personality which probably is the most acutely affected is his emotions. Either he passes through long periods when he is completely apathetic and blasS, or he has violent emotional reactions which are totally out of propor- -tion to the stimuli producing them. Thus, for example, he may become extremely angry over some minor incident which the average religious would pass over almost unnoticed. In gen-eral, he manifests a loss of interest in the things ~which interest most religious. The religious life becomes empty and mean-ingless. In the active phase, hallucinations are not infrequent among religious who suffer from schizophrenia. These hallu-cinations may take the form of visions or the hearing of heavenly voices. Since the schizophrenic is convinced that these voices 30 January, 1959 SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS are commands from God, he feels compelled to follow what-ever they suggest. The fact that much that they command may be entirely illogical and unbecoming the wisdom of God makes little or no difference to him. The discerning of hallu-cinations from true gifts of God has produced many a trying session for spiritual directors. For the ~chizophrenic, the most distressing feature of his disorder is a feeling of complete isolation. He is like a man totally cut off from the outside world. He is surrounded by towering walls. He can sit in a crowded recreation room and" still feel that he is alone. A sense of belonging is foreign to him. He is keenly aware that he is very different from his brethren. He is convinced that they look upon him as some-one very different from themselves. As much as he would like to get outside of himself, he is still unable to reach out to others. The wall must first be breached f~om the outside before he will ever be able to allow himself to reach out to others. In brief, fraternal charity in its fullest sense must inevitably play a part in the cure of the schizophrenic religious. Paranoia Of all the psychotic disorders, paranoia is the most dis-ruptive to community life. The priest, brother, or sister who becomes paranoid almost inevitably turns.against his or her community or certain members of the community. He sees his brethren as dangerous threats to his persorial integrity and sometimes even to his life. Starting from a few false premises which usually stem from his own deep feelings of inferiority and in-adequacy, he becomes convinced that the other members of the community are persecuting him in a variety of wgys. Thus, for example, a fellow priest may open a window to allow a little more air into a stuffy recreation room. He is immediately accused of deliberately trying to make the paranoid religious catch a cold. An unpleasant scene results with the paranoid slamming the window closed and storming out of the room. As the delusional system develops, the sick religious may no 31 RICHARD P. VAUGHAN Review for Religious longer trust the food that is offered at the regular meals. He may become convinced that the other members of the com-munity are trying to poison him. In an attempt to escape such a fate, he will make use of many forms of unusual behavior. The most distressing aspect of paranoia is the seeming normalcy of the individual in all other areas--those that are not connected with the delusion system. He can ,carry on a very intelligent conversation, and those who do not know him well can see nothing different about, him. Unfortunately, in the initial stages most religious fail to recognize the odd behavior of the paranoid as an indication of sickness. They interpret the threatening words and violent acts as simple manifestations 6f vice. Sometimes they lash back at him, only to make the psychotic episode worse. Had they calmly stood their ground and pointed out to the ailing religious that they had no intention of perseciating him by their action, they could have been of positive assistance. The apparent normalcy of the paranoid priest, brother, or sister causes him or h~r to become a great problem to the community. *Frequently, he or she is not sick enough to be hospitalized and thus must remain in the community. As a consequence; many a superior is at a loss as to just how such a subject should be treated. Should he be allowed to continue his provoking and sometimes destructive behavior, or should he be threatened with drastic action if he persists? Once a superior takes the latter stand, he immediately becomes deeply allied with the enemy.as far as the pa.ranoid is concerned. He then ceases to have any influence over the afflicted religious. If, on the other hand, he allows the outbursts of anger or even the physical assaults to continue, he is doing an injustice to the community. Expedience usually wins out, with the paranoid religious being moved from house to house or being left in a community where he can do the least damage. In general, it can be stated that paranoia is the least suscep-tible of all the psychotic disorders to the" influence of psycho- 32 January, 1959 SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS kherapy. To break through a well-knit system of delusions that has been standing for some time is an almost Herculean task. The chief obstacle to therapy is the attitude of the para-noid toward the therapist, who is likely to become just one more in the ranks of the enemy. This is particularly true in the case of a religious, because he has usually been sent to the psychia-trist for help by a superior. The paranoid immediately suspects that the superior and the psychiatrist are plotting against him. The chance of a cure, therefore, is poor. The best solution to this vexing problem is the use of preventive measures. A well-conducted psychological screening program can detect paranoid tendencies. Moreover, if a religious manifests characteristics of a paranoid during his formative years, there should be serious question as to his suitability for community life. Severe Depressions A third psychotic disorder which occurs among religious is a state of severe depression. This condition is characterized by a deep sadness which completely overwhelms the individual. It is often "triggered" by some anxiety-provoking incident; but, instead of being able to handle the situation, the religious lapses into a state of profound grief and sorrow that closely approximates despair. This state is generally accompanied by restlessness and disturbances in sleeping and eating habits. The afflicted individual is filled with a deep sense of guilt and personal worthlessness. He is prone to worry and self-re-proach. Depression in some form is a component of almost all emotional and mental disorders. It becomes a psychotic symp-tom when the sufferer loses his grasp on reality. The religious who is so afflicted gives up all interest in living and, as a con-sequence, fails to care for the ordinary needs of life. He Will sit in his room by the hour in mute silence. He seems oblivious. to the comforting remarks of his fellow religious. He can see nothing, good in himself or his past life. He feels that he has 33 RICHARD P. VAUC, HAN Review for ReligioUs been a total failure. He sees no use in trying to continue in the religious state. Frequently he despairs of saving his sou!. He is convinced that God has justly abandoned him. Needless to say, when a priest, brother, or sister his reached this condi-tion of mind, the possibility of suicide is a factor which must be taken into consideration. A psychotic depression is more apt to strike a religious in the middle-forty years or later rather than in the earlier years of religious life. Sisters who are passing through that period which is called ~th~ change of life" are more prone to be so afflicted. If the religious is eventually going tb regain his or her mental balance, true understanding and immediate med-ical care are imperative." A psychotic depression is not a spiritual problem, even though the element of despair may be present. The condition cannot be eliminated by the more fruitful use of the sacraments and greater effort at prayer. The severely depressed religious has lost contact with God, just as he has lost contact with the rest of reality. This contact must be reestablished through the medium of competent psychiatric help. Attitude Toward Psychotics The attitude of a community plays ’a major role in the ultimate recovery or relapse of a psychotic member. Whether the severely ill member will accept psychiatric help frequently depends upon how such help is viewed by the other’ members of the community. If being hospitalized or undergoing exten-sive psychotherapy becomes one of those issues that is hidden in the back closet of the cloister or convent and not even revealed to other members of the same order or congregation, then it can only be expected that this attitude will tend to isolate the psychotic’even more. He then becomes sure that he is entirely different from any other member in the community. As a consequence, he wil! be seriously handicapped in making the step which will allow him to undergo treatment willingly, for that °deep feeling of isolation will not permit him to reach 34 January, 1959 SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS out even to the therapist who wants to help him. On the other hand, granted that he has assented to psychiatric treatment and has been helped, whether this help will be lasting will depend to a great extent upon how he is received once he has returned to his community. Perhaps there is no situation in community life where there is a. greater need of charity. Only charity can help the psychotic religious regain that sense of belonging with the community. Only charity; can give him confidence in himself and that sense of security which he so sadly lacks. If he can see that others are truly interested in him as a person, then perhaps he will gradually come to think of himself in a less derogato’ry manner. Eventually, it is hoped that .he will be able to view objectively some of his assets and see how he can put these assets to use by helping others. Left to himself, he and all that he is and has is locked within himself. Only understanding and love can open the door. Though the psychotic religious may not realize it at the time, he is very like to our Lord as He knelt ’in the Garden of Olives. The religious who has been psychotic, better than any other mortal, can appreciate this phase of the Passion. For, just as the Master felt the terrible weight of others’ guilt pressing Him to the ground and almost crushing the life out of Him, so too has the psychotic been burdened and crushed by his own imagine~l guilt. He has known the meaning of abandonment. He has experienced loneliness. His disorder cuts him off from those who are near and dear to him. He feels that no one else can really understand what he is still suffering and has suffered. He too came to his brethren and, with a note of despair in his voice, pleaded, "Can you not watch one hour with me?" His words fell on deaf ears because ~they could not understand what he was enduring. Then, like our Blessed Lord, he returned alone to do battle with the violent conflict that was going on within his soul. He can only hope RICHARD P. VAUGHAN that one day his resurrection from this terrifying ordeal will be a full reality. That day can be hastened by the understanding and love of the members of his community. Corn m un ica!:ions Reverend Fathers: Just a word regarding one point of Fatt~er Thomas Dubay’s "Retreats in Retrospect" in the January, 1958, issue. He says that "if there is such a thing as a psychology of religions women ..... it is the religious women themselves who must give an account of it." Many retreat masters (and any re!!gious women who are plan-ning to give an account of such a psychology) wiil find mostinter-esting and helpful paragraphs in the pamphlet, The Society of the Sacred Heart, by Janet Erskine Stuart. I believe it can be obtained from any convent of the Religious of the Sacred Heart. We hap-pened on it accidentally and have often mentioned the splendid points she develops regarding the particular needs of religious women and their particular failings, seldom, if ever, mentioned even in spir-itual books. Another thought occurs to me: that the presentation of the vow and virtue of chastity needs a slightly different emphasis for women religious, which is sometimes overlooked. The same blunt way which might be all right for men offends the sensibilities of women. A Sister DELAYED VOCATIONS ~Condnued from page 24) the Third Order Secular, and yearly make the vow of chastity and the promises of poverty and obedience. Catholic women eighteen years of age or older who are free from all legal impediments, who have the right intention, and who are capable of fulfilling the duties required of them can be admitted. There is no age limit, but certain restrictions are observed for women past fifty. For further information write to: Mother Superior, St. Francis Aposto-late, 114 East Kings Highway, San Antonio 12, Texas. The Sisters of Our Lady of Charity are also willing to consider the applications of candidates who are over thirty years of agd. Widows and married women who are legally and permanently sep-arated with ecclesiastical permission are acceptable if otherwise quali-fied. Address: Mother Superior, 485 Best Street, Buffalo 8, New York. 36 Christ: t:he Aut:hor and Source ot: :he Supernat:ural Lit:e Daniel J.’/~. Callahan, S.J. TO COUNTERACT prevalent errors, the Council of ~Frent devoted the entire sixth session to a succinct exposition of: "The true and salutary doctrine on justification which the ’Sun of Justice’ (Mal. 4:2) Christ.Jesus, ’The Author and Finisher of faith’ (Hebr. 12:2) taught, which the Apostles transmitted, and which the Catholic Church under the inspira-tion of the Holy Spirit has always maintained" (Introduction). Then, after a brief indication of our human weakness and helplessness in Chapter One, the next chapter unfolds for us the role of Christ in our rehabilitation.~ He offered abundant reparation for our sins, restored our adopted sonship of God, and, having thus redeemed us, became for us the source of all grace in the present life and of eternal glory in the next. In the first paragraph of the encyclical, Mediator Dei, Pope Plus XII stresses the identical truth in these words: Mediator between God and men and High Priest who has gone before us into heaven, Jesus the Son of God quite clearly had one aim in view when He undertook the mission of mercy which was to endow mankind, with the rich blessings of supernatural grace. Sin had dis-turbed the right relationship between man and his Creator; the son of God would restore it. The children of Adam were wretched heirs to the infection of original sin; He would bring them back to their heavenly Father, the primal source and final destiny of all things. He ¯ . . gave Himself besides in prayer and sacrifice to the task of saving souls, even to the point of offering Himself as He hung from the cross, a victim unspotted unto God, to purify our conscience of dead works, to serve the living God. Thus happily were all men summoned back from the byways leading them down to ruin and disaster, to be set squarely once again upon the path that leads to God. We shared in the lamentable sin of Adam, forfeited sanc-tifying grace and our celestial heritage; and of our unaided strength we never could have retrieved the loss. A mediator, one acceptable to God and to man because sharing the nature of each, was indispensable; and where could he be found? 37 DANIEL J. M. CALLAHAN Review for Religiou.u On.ly a divine person.incarnate could supply the need. The Second Divine Person became a member of the human family, substituted Himself for us, assumed our responsibility and in-debtedness, freely and lovingly submitted to humiliation and suffering of every description, made perfect atonement, ren-dered boundless honor, praise, and service to God, reopened heaven, and placed within our reach all the means requisite for holiness.of life here and endless happiness hereafter. Such was and is our compassionate and ideal Intermediary who re-leased us from the servitude of Satan, appeased His ’Father, reinstated us in the love and friendship of the adorable Trinity and proffered to us the priceless treasures of grace and of participation in His own life. Such is the revealed Catholic dogma on our redemption through the satisfaction and merits of Christ our M~diator with His Father. By satisfaction is meant the payment or restitution of What is due. When it is offered in reparation f6r personal offense, we call it moral; and it consists in the spontaneous submission and honor sufficient to make amends for the indig-nity and to conciliate the person offended. If it is morally equivalent to the affront, it is said to be condign; if it is not but is nonetheless accepted by the aggrieved party, we call. it con-gruous. Christ, really God and really man, in His. human nature became our sponsor offering to" God vicarious satisfac-tion. His least suffering, His slightest humiliation would have been amply su~cient to expiate every sin, for every action and suffering of His was of.infinite value since it was performed or accepted by a divine person. But, to bring home to us more impressively the infinite sanctity of God, the enormity of sin, and the ineffable love of Jesus for us, the eternal Father exacted from Him all the sacrifices of His earthly career and their consummation in His passion and death in ato.n.ement for our blindness, our ingratitude, our r~bellion, and our malice. Logically satisfaction precedes merit. The culprit must repent of his sin in order that it be pardoned and grace infused. 38 January, 1959 THE SUPERNATURAL LIFE Actually all the free acts of Christ were both satisfactory and meritorious. Supernatural merit is a right to a supernatural reward issuing from a supernatural deed freel~ accomplished ~or God’s sake and from His promise to compensate for it. Christ’s merit for us is founded on His grace as Head of the human race and on the supreme liberty and boundless love with which He" underwent His passion for all men. And, since He who thus merited is .God, His merits are of infinite value and inexhaustible efficacy. Though Christ’s reparation was superabundant and readily accepted by God, it was achieved, not by us, but by our sponsor; and therefore God could and did attach compliance with definite conditions for its application to us individually. Though God created us without our cooperation, He will not sanctify nor save us apart from it. And provided we concur with Him, we have the divine assurance of the full remission of our sins, no matter how heinous they may be, and of our restoration to His grace and intimate friendship. Though the glorified Christ no longer makes reparation nor merits for us, His acquired satisfaction and merits are most advantageous to us. Ceaselessly He offers them for us: "To appear now before the face of God on our behalf. He is able to save those who come to God through Him, since He lives always to make intercession for them,", as St. Paul writes in Hebrews 9:24; 7:25. And in acknowledging our helplessness and unworthiness and in pleading with the Church through the satisfaction and merits of Jesus, we glorify God and proclaim that His Son is the omnipotent Mediator whom He has been pleased to give .us. We are to have a resolute faith and trust in the exhaustless riches amassed for us by our blessed Lord; and, receiving all from Jesus, we should render to Him and our common Father in the unity of the Holy Spirit praise, glory, and thanksgiving. United with Christ our Head, we have also been enabled to offer reparation for sin and to merit supernaturally. This 39 DANIEL J. M. CALLAHAN Review for Religious we accomplish by means of every good action done in the state of grace and with purity of intention, and thus we co-operate with Him in our personal growth in holiness and in that of the neighbor. Like the living cell~~ in our body, each one of us can greatly contribute to the spiritual welfare and expansion of the Church, the Mystical Body.of Christ, of which He is the Head and we the members. And while thus assisting others, we effectively ~omote our own sanctity and together with our Head practicg:the purest charity and share in ~the same life. Such association with our Savior evidences the abundance of His redemption, is most glorious to Him and a tremendous comfort to us. We are not to infer that with His "Consummatum est" Christ terminated His activity on our behalf. He is still con-tinually operative in the sanctuary of our souls, imparting grace, enabling us to ~levelop our sup.ernatural life and to partake ever more of the life that is His. He remain~ our universal Mediator, High Priest, and Redeemer dispensing through His human nature divine blessing with a lavish hand. "Christ our Lord brings the Church to live His own supernatural life, by His divine power permeates His whole Body and nourishes and sustains each of the members according to the place which they occupy in the Body, very much as the vine nourishes and makes fruitful the branches which are joined to it" (Encyclical on the Mystical Body of Christ, n. 67). Since Christ’s Ascension, He continues to dispense His .graces through the sacraments. It is He who through the Church baptizes, teaches, rules, looses, binds, offers, sacrifices .... Holiness begins from Christ; by Christ it is effected. For no act conducive to salvation can be performed unless it proceeds from Him as its supernatural cause. "Without me," He says, "you can do nothing." If we grieve and do penance for our sins, if with filial fear and hope we turn again to God, it is because He is leading us. Grace and glory flow from His unfath-omed fulness. Our Saviour is continually pouring out His gifts of counsel, fortitude, fear and piety, especially on the leading members of His Body, so that the whole Body may grow daily more and 4O January, 1959 THE SUPERNATURAL LIFE more in spotless holiness. When the Sacraments of the Church are administered by external rite, it is He who produces their effect in souls. He nourishes the redeemed with His own flesh and blood, and thus calms the soul’s turbulent passions; He gives increase of grace and is preparing future glory for souls and bodies. (Encyclical on the Mystical Body of Christ, nn. 67, 63) The Christian sacraments signify and produce grace; they envelop our entire life; at all its momentous stages they provide for our spiritual needs. They may be likened to so many channels through which the life of Christ is communicated to us. It remains for us to intensify our appreciation of them, to enlarge the capacity of our souls through rep.entance, hu-mility, confidence, and above all through love, thus rendering the efficacy of the sacraments more profound, vast, enduring. Even apart from the sacraments, Christ is energetic in us whenever we approach Him. Divine strength issues from Him and permeates our, souls. In the words of the Council of Trent: "As-the head in the members and as the vine in the branches, Christ Jesus constantly exercisesHis sanctifying power in the just, which salutary influenacleways precedes, accompanies, and follows their good works"(Sess. 6, Chap. 16). Animated faith in His divinity, His almighty power, and His undying love communicates to the soul the grace to elim-inate sin, imperfections, inordinate attachment to self and other creatures, the courage to eliminate all obstacles and thus effect our unconditioned surrender to Him. Dedicated to God and to the attainment of perfection, the better we religious understand the relation of our spiritual life to Christ, the more shall we love Him, the more shall we treasure our vocation, and the more shall we endeavor to attract others to Him. Then, too, shall we more readily appreciate why no sins are irremissible, why through the sacrifice of the Mass we can offer the most acceptable reparation for past sins and how by means of the remedial efficacy of the sacraments we can be loyal to Him for the future. 41 Survey of Roman Document:s R. F. Smit:h, S.J. [The present article wil! summarize the documents published in Acta Apos-tolicae Sedis (AAS) from August 1, 1958, to September 22, 1958, the latter date being that of the last issue of AAS that was published before the death of Pius XII. All page references throughout the survey are to the 1958 AAS (v. 50).] An Encyclical to Chinese Catholics U NDER "J’H.E. DATE of June 29, 1958 (AAS, pp. 601-14), the late Holy Father issued the encyclical Ad apostolorum prin-cipis sepu!chrum (At the Tomb of the Prince of the Apostles) directed to the hierarchy and the faithful~ of China. Having noted that the Church is foreign to no country and hostile to no land, the Po~pe expressed his alarm over a new association formed in China under civil auspices, membership in which is being forced upon Catholics. The association, he noted, ostensibly combines love of religion and country, desire for world peace, and devotion to religious liberty. In reality, however, the chief purpose of the association is to gradually lead Catholics to embrace atheistic materi-alism; it accuses Catholic bishops and even the Holy See of insane desires for temporal power and of extorting money from the people; and under a campaign for religious liberty it really seeks to make the Church completely subservient to civil authority. Because all this is attempted in the name of patriotism, Pius XII recalled to the minds of all Chinese Catholics their duty of loving their country with a strong, sincere affection; they must obey civil authority, provided nothing is commanded that is against divine law; and they nlust seek to foster and increase the prosperity of their country, fulfilling in these ways the saying of our Redeemer: "Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s" (Lk 20:25). Nevertheless, he added, they must also remember that if civil authority should command anything that is against the rights of God, then all Catholics must repeat and follow the words of St. Peter: "Man must obey God rather than man" (Acts 5:29). Having. reminded the Chinese Catholics that true peace can be had only by the i~rinciples of justice and love and that the" teach-ing power of the Church extends to all human actions in so far as they are morally good or bad, Plus XII went on to point out that 42 ROMAN DOCUMENTS the civil government in China has no right to appoint bishops; con-sequently bishops appointed by the Chinese government have no power of teaching or of ju~:isdiction. Moreover, even if they should be validly consecrated, their actions would nevertheless remain gravely illicit. The Holy Father concluded his encyclical by expressing the sorrow that the Church’s condition in China has caused him and told the faithful ia China to strengthen themselves with the hope that the present persecution will lead to a new growtl~ of the Church and to days of happiness and joy. Sacred Music and the Liturgy On September 3, 1958 (AAS, pp. 630-63), the Sacred Congrega-tion of Rites issued an instruction on sacred music and the liturgy in accordance with the principles laid down by the encyclicals Musicae sacrae disciplina and Mediator Dei. The first of the three chapters that form the body of the instruction defines sacred liturgy as those actions which were insti-tuted by Christ or by the Church and which are performed in their names by legitimately designated persons according to the liturgical books approved by the Holy See. All other sacred functions, whether performed, in or outside a church, are to be called devotional exercises, even when they are conducted by a priest. The second chapter notes that devotional exercises should not be inserted into liturgical functions. It further states that the language of liturgical functions is Latin unless exceptions are made in certain cases in approved liturgical books. In sung Masses, every-thing must be in Latin, except where a hundred-year or immemorial custom allows the insertion of vernacular hymns after the liturgical words have been duly sung in Latin. At low Masses all those who directly participate in the Mass must use only Latin; other prayers, however, and hymns may be’in the vernacular. St is, however, desirable that on Sundays and feast days the Gospel and the Epistle be read by a lector in the vernacular. In the third chapter the document gives special norms to be observed in the various liturgical functions. It begins by taking up the matter of lay participation in sung Masses, pointing out that three levels of such participation a~re possible. The first level is had when" the faithful give all the liturgical responses; the second occurs when the laity sing all or some of the parts of the Ordinary of the Mass; while the third level of lay participation involves the 43 R. F. SMITH Review for Religious singing of the Proper of the Mass. This last level is urged especially for religious communities and for seminaries. The Congregation then adds various other regulations for sung Masses. A Latin hymn may be added after the Offertory and Communion Antiphons. The faithful who go to Communion may say the threefold Domine, non sum dignus with the celebrant. The Sanctus and ~lenedictus are not to be separated if they are sung in Gregorian chant; in other cases the Benedictus is to be sung after the Consecration. The Congregation suggests that silence be had from the Consecration to the Pater noster, unless the Benedictus is to be sung during that time. Finally the document notes that the organ should not be played during the priest’s blessing at the conclusion of Mass. The instruction then considers the matter of lay participation in low Masses. The first level of such participation is had when the faithful join in the Mass by reading their Missals or by engaging privately in other suitable prayers and devotions. In these cases organ or other instrumental music may be played except during the following parts of the Mass: after the priest’s arrival at the altar to the Offertory; from the verses preceding the preface to the Sanctus; where the custom exists, from the Consecration to the Pater noster; from the Pater noster to the dgnus Dei; during the Confiteor before the communion of the faithful; and during the last blessing. The second level of lay participation at low ’Mass is had when the faithful sing hymns or recite suitable prayers in common. The third level includes various grades of participation according as the faithful make all or some of the liturgical responses or, besides this, recite the Gloria, Credo, Sanctus-Benedictus, and Agnus Dei with the celebrant. The highest grade of this third level of participation in low Mass is had when the faithful, besides observing the foregoing, recite with the priest the Introit, the Gradual, the Offertory, and the Communion. Finally the instruction permits the faithful at low Masses to recite in Latin with the priest the Pater noster, adding the ~ltaen at its conclusion. The instruction then regulates conventual Masses, prescribing that these should be solemn Masses or at least high Masses to be celebrated after Terce, though the superior of the community may for grave reasons have it celebrated after Sext or None. The docu-ment then approves the practice on special occasions of many priests attending a Mass where they all receive communion but prohibits 44 January, 1959 ROMAN DOCUMENTS "synchronized" Masses wh~re two or more priests celebrate Mass simultaneously at different altars in the same church, each one keep-ing in complete unison with the other(s). With regard to the Divine Office, the instruction notes that the recitation of the Office by those obliged to it is always an act of public worship. It also urges that at least on some Sundays and feast days of the year Vespers should be sung with the people .and warns local ordinaries to see to it that evening Masses do not prevent such Vespers. Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, the document remarks, is a liturgical function and hence should be held in accordance with the prescriptions of the Roman Ritual, though other methods of conducting Benediction can be permitted by the local ordinary if these are based on immemorial tradition. In the next part the instruction notes that polyphonic music an~l modern sacred music used at liturgical functions must follow the norms set down in Musicae sacrae disciplina; it emphasizes the need of fostering popular religious hymns; and it forbids religious music, that is, music intended to arouse and foster pious sentiments but not composed for divine worship, to be played in church, though for exceptional reasons local ordinaries may. permit concerts of such music in church. After repeating existing legislation about liturgical chant books and after noting that some musical instruments are not fitted for Church use, the document points out that the principal instrument of the liturgy is the pipe organ, though a reed organ may also be used. Electrophonetic organs may be tolerated temporarily with the explicit permission of the local ordinary. Other instruments, espe-cially string instruments played with a bow, may be used provided they are played with religious gravity and decorum. All recorded or broadcast music is forbidden to be used during liturgical functions and during devotional exercikes, whether in or out of church; ampli-fiers, however, or loudspeakers may be used. No movies of any type may be shown in churches for any reason; liturgical functions, however, may be broadcast or televised if express permission for this is given by the local ordinary. The Congregation then notes that organ music, except for Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, is forbidden during Advent, Lent, Passiontide, at the Office and Mass of the Ember Days of September; and at all Offices and Masses for the dead. Other 45 R. F. SMITH Review for Religious instrumental music is prohibited besides on Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima Sundays and the ferials following these days. "Within these forbidden times for music, however, the Congregation lists certain exceptions. Thus organs and other instruments are permitted on holy days of obligat!on that fall on week days, on the feast of the principal .local patron, on the titular feast or on the dedication anniversary of the church, on the titular feast or founder’s feast of a religious family, and wheneger an extraordinary solemnity takes place. Moreover, pipe and reed organs are permitted on the third Sunday of Advent and on the fourth Sunday of Lent, at the Mass of Chrism or/ Holy Thursday, and at evening Mass on Holy Thursday.from the beginning to the Gloria. During all the forbiddefi times pipe and reed organ.s may be tlsed at Mass and Vespers to accompany the chant; during the last three days of Holy Week; however, the organ may not be used even for this purpose, except for ¯ the exceptions on Holy Thursday noted above. Finally during the last three days of Holy Week all use of the organ, is prohibited during devotional exercises, even though a contrary custom may now exist. The instruction next insists that every effort be made that churches as well as public and semi-public oratories have one or two bells which should be consecrated or at least blessed. Carillons, however, are to be excluded from all liturgical use; nor may record-ings of bells be used. In the next section the document suggests that at Mass and at the more complicated liturgical functions use be made of a "com-mentator’’~ who would briefly explain the individual parts of the services and direct the faithful’s response and singing. If possible, the "commentator" should be a priest; if necessary, however, a lay man of upright life may perform this office. The rest of the document is concerned with" parish and diocesan organizations to foster proper execution and appreciation of sacred music. Finally, in its concluding paragraph the instruction notes that Plus XII approved in a special way all the contents of the document. Notice should also be taken here of an admonition of the Holy Office given on July 24, 1958 (AAS, p. 536). Having received a report that the phrase "the mystery of faith" had been omitted from the formula for the consecration of the wine in a vernacular trans- 46 January, 1959 ROMAN L)OCUMENTS lation of Holy Week Services and that some priests had omitted these words in celebrating Mass, the Holy Office recalled that it is forbidden to make such changes in the sacred rites or to remove anything from the liturgical books. Allocutions and Messages On July 19, J~uly 25, and August 2, 1958 (AAS, pp. 562-86), the late Holy Father broadcast a three-part aIlocution to the contempla-tive nuns of the world. Since the full text of the allocution will be given in REWEW ~:Og RELIGIOUS beginning in the present issue, no further notice need be taken of the address here. On July 2, 1958 (AAS, pp. 523-30), Plus XII spoke to the Women’s Union of Italian Catholic Action. After giving a long history of the achievements of the Union since its founding by pope St. Plus X, the Holy Father recalled to his listeners what he termed "the triangle of Christian life": personal sanctity, external apostolate, socio-civic activity. He told them that of these three facets of Christian life, the first is the most important, since it must always be successful, even when because of external conditions the other two are not. The Union, he concluded, like all other apostolic groups in the Church, has no greater enemy than spiritual sterility. Later, on July 13, 1958 (AAS pp. 530-35), the Pope spoke to the young women’s section of Italian Catholic Action, discussing with them the two main vocations of Christian womanhood: consecrated virginity and Christian motherhood. On June 29, 1958 (AAS, pp. 518-23), the Vicar of Christ spoke to an international group of ear, nose, and throat specialists. After considering the conditions necessary for progress in medical matters, he concluded by urging, the doctors to imitate Christ as He passed among the suffering of the human race. Like Him, they should seek to assuage the pain of men in the hope of preparing their hearts for the coming of the kingdom of God. To the members of the First International Catholic Conference on Health, Plus XII on July 27, 1958 /AAS, pp. 586-91), stressed the necessity of co-operation among all those who are concerned with private and public health matters. He also reminded them that as Christ healed physical and moral sickness in order to lead men to recognize Him as the resurrection and the life, so Catholics in health work should conduct themselves in such a way that observers may be able to divine from their conduct their attachment to the Church and to the Holy Spirit who animates the Church. 47 R. F. SMITH Review for Religion,s On June 22, 1958 (AAS, pp. 514-18), the Holy Father addressed a group of Italian brokers, telling them that economic activity, like every type of human activity, must submit itself to divine law. After recalling the moral duties of brokers, he concluded by urging his listeners to remember that there is onIy one mediator (the Italian word for broker is t~¢diat,,re) between God and man. Like Christ the Mediator, he said, the brokers in their professional work should try to be instruments of salvation a~3d of sanctification, thereby assist-ing the world of business to become a truly Christian world. Under the date of July 21, 1958 (AAS, pp. 592-93), Plus XII sent a written message to.an international group of workers on pilgrimage at Lourdes, bidding them to look at the Blessed Virgin and thereby realize that man’s supreme goal is not an earthly, but a heavenly, one. On August 15, 1958 (AAS, pp. 622-25), the Holy Father despatched a written message to those present at the sacred functions held in the pontifical pavilion at the Brussels World Exposi-tion, telling them that the human accomplishments on exposition in the city are incomplete unless they lead to the adoration of God from whom all good .things come. He also expressed his satisfaction that in the pontifical pavilion Christ is really present in the Eucharist, for this is an attestation of those absolute values of religion and of morality without which all material things do not find their unity or their ultimate perfection. Miscellaneous Matters By an apostolic letter of February 14, 1958 (AAS, pp. 512-.13), Plus XII declared St. Clare to be patroness of television. On May 29, 1958 (AAS, pp. 544-46), the Sacred Congregation of Rites approved the introduction of the cause of the Servant of God Dominic of the Blessed Sacrament (1901-1927), professed priest of the Order. of the Most Holy Trinity. On the same date {AAS, pp. 594-98) the same Congregation si~nilarly approved the introduction of the cause of the Servant of God Emmanuel d’Alzon {1810-1880}, priest, founder of the Assumptionists as well as of the Oblate Sisters of the Assumption. In the issues of AAS under consideration the Sacred Penitentiary released the official text of two prayers written by Plus XII. The first, issued under the date August 2, 1957 (AAS, pp. 599-600), is a prayer to the Blessed Virgin to be recited by all Christian women who, when they recite the prayer devoutly, may gain an indulgence of three years. The second prayer, the text of which was published 48 January, 1959 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS under the date of June 24, 1958 (AAS, pp. 547-48), is a prayer be recited during the coming National Italian Eucharistic Congress; the faithful who say the prayers during the congress may gain an indulgence of three years. The final document to be noted here is one from the Pontifical Commission for the Oriental Code of Canon Law; the document gives a textua[ change that henceforth is to be incorporated in Canon 215, § 2 of the Oriental Code. Ques ’ons and Answers [The following answers are given by Father Joseph F. Gallen, S.J., professor of canon law at Woodstock College, Woodstock, Maryland.] ¯ How justifiable is the phrase "brain-washed" religious? Let us hope there is no justification. The essence of the religious life is a personal and complete consecration of one’s self to God. A vow is a free promise made to God. This personal element can never be abandoned in the actual living of the religious life nor in forma-tion, direction, or government. The members of the one institute should manifest common traits but they should never lose their in-dividuality. All life demands a measure of adjustment and conformity, but not complete conformity. A formation that would stifle all in-" dividual thinking, judgment, initiative, and responsibility would be evidently defective and equally dangerous. All cannot be fitted into one mold; and if this is attempted, some will escape with no less violence than damage. Grace purifies, assists, and elevates natural abilities, but does not create them nor .destroy them. Perfect conform-ity is not even desirable, simply because the common way of thinking and acting is rarely the highest. An evident cause of the force of bad example is the fact that so few think for themselves. A religious institute should be grateful to its prudent dissenters. The soft bed of the same and of what everybody else is doing is molded so com-fortably to the many; but let us thank God that it is a torture to a few intelligent, spiritual, and prudent religious. "There are counterfeits of obedience. The ps);chological inferior-ity complex created by a habit of submission must not be confused with the virtue of obedience, which encourages in oneself many. quali- 49 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Review for Religious ties, much spontaneity, and interior freedom. The obedience oi: the perfect is not only perfection in obedience strictly so called; it is accompanied by perfection in all other virtues." Reverend M. J. Nicholas, O. P., Religious Sisters, 82. "Obedience should not be based on an excessive multiplicity of orders or be so minute as to fix every moment and action of the re-ligious life. The result would be to materialize obedience and the life it..self; and the religious, confined in such a circle, would end by acting as an automaton." Reverend Maurus a Grizzana, O. F. M. Cap., Acta et Documenta Congressus Generalis de Statibus Pertrectionis, II, 177. "The man should be formed in the religious. Isn’t it highly proper that a formed r~ligious should be a man of principle, of char-acter, who is not in constant need of help and support from outside himself, who can find within himself the intelligence and the force necessary for action, at least in normal circumstances, in a word, a re,an, and not a perpetual infant?" Reverend R. Arnou, S..J., ihiJ., 542. "But in the convent, nearly everything is built on the passive. The activity of thesisters is directed in every detail. Nearly every minut~ has its task. The concept of obedience and detachment appeals more to the passive than the active type. But not all possess the ability to. put themselves into a mold. It is astonishing how men religious in general retain their personality in religious life, wh’ile nuns easily lose theirs because they try to conform themselves to the type their con-gregation sets up as an ideal, taking on their manners, style of lilCe, and mentality." Sister Agnes, S. H. C., Religious Life Today, 163. 12-- It is a rather generally accepted custom in our institute for the local superiors to give permission to the religious to retain and use the Christmas gifts they receive. May this custom be followed? We are to presume that the will of a superior is reasonable and in accbrd with the norms of the religious life. The reasonable inter-pretation of this custom is that the superior intends the religious to retain only the things that are necessary and proportionately useful. All other gifts are to be handed in. We are likewise to presume that a superior in no way intends to exclude mortification and detachment and "therefore is in no sense averse to religious handing in gifts that they could consider even necessary. ’ 50 Jan~a~’y, 1959 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS I have heard many retreat masters say that the only thing de-manded by poverty is permission. Is this true? It is not complete and is misleading. Permission in poverty merely excludes sin from the action. To be fully accurate, it ex-cludes sin only t:rom the object of the action, not from its motive or circumstances. I do not say this frequently happens, but it is possible for a religious to have a sinful motive in something he secures permis’sion for. The statement is especially inadequate because it neglects the~ higher degrees of poverty-and minimizes the entire purpose of poverty in the religious life, which is detachment from material things. Securing permissiori is an aid to detachment, bdt it is obviously possible /:or a religious to b~ attached to something for which he has secured permission. "It seems that particularly in the study of moral theology and canon law a sufficient distinction is not made between the viewpoint of simple morality, sin and no sin, and that of Christian perfection. The norm of life of the religious is not merely the sin.less but the more perfect." Reverend Benjamin of the Most Holy Trinity, O~C.D., Acta et Documenta Congressus Genera~is de Statibus Per° fectionis, II, 195. "Moral theology is too often taught in a negative and legalistic way, which results in its boring those who require to live on what they are learning. One cannot live on prohibitions. In reality, the teaching of moral theology, rightfully understood, is the basis of spiritual theology." Reverend Lucien-Marie de St. Joseph, O.C.D., The Doctrinal Instruction of Religious Sisters,. 95.° The constitutions of our pontifical congregation of ~isters, in the chapter on the care of the sick, contain the following article: "The sick who have been in bed for a month and hav~ nb certain hope of speedy recovery, may, on the prudent advice, of their con-fessor, receive the Holy Eucharist once or twice a week even though they have taken medicine or something to drink." We were later instructed that this should be changdd to: "On "the prudent advice of a confessor, the sick; even though not confined to bed, may take something to drink before ~Communion~ if their sickness does not permit them to observe the full fast without real inconvenience; they may also take solid or liquid medicines. All alcoholic liquids are ~UESTIONS AND ANSWERS excluded." We are now told that the article should be changed to: "Without any limitation of time before the reception of Holy Com-munion, the sick, even though not confined to bed, may take non, alcoholic liquids and anything that is truly a medicine, whether liquid or solid." We are about to reprint our constitutions. Do .we need the permission of the Holy See to change the wording of. this article? No. It is true that a change in the constitutions demands the permission of the Holy See in a pontifical congregation and that of all the ordinaries in whose dioceses the institute has houses in the case of a diocesan congregation. However, the constitutions in this case are merely stating an enactment of the Church. Since the enactment has been changed, the statement of it in your constitu-tions should also be changed. SOME BOOKS RECEIVED [Only bobks sent directly to the Book Review Editor, West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana, are included in our Reviews and Announcements. The following books were sent to St. Marys.] Saint Clare Patroness of Television. By Mabel Farnum. Society ¯ -of St. Paul, 2187 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island 14, New York. 25c (paper cover). Life in Christ: Instructions in the Catholic Faith, By Reverends James Killgallon and Gerard Weber. Life in Christ, 720 North Rush Street, Chicago 11, Illinois. $1.00 (paper cover). What Is Faith? By Eugene Joly. Translated by Dora Illtyd Trethowan. Hawthorn Books, 70 Fifth Avenue,. New York 11, New York. $2.95. What Is the Bible? By Henri Daniel-Rops. Translated by J. R. Foster. Hawthorn Books, 70 Fifth Avenue, New York 11, New York. $2.95. Bibliographie Ignatienne: 1894-1957. By J. F[ Gilmont, S.J., and P. Daman, S.J. Descl~e de Brouwer, Paris. 165 Belgian francs (paper cover). Education and the Liturgy: 18th North American Liturgical Week. The Liturgibal Conference, EIsberry, Missouri. $2.00 (paper Cover) . SUMMER INSTITUTES FOR RELIGIOUS The Reverend Owen M. Cloran, s.J., will conduct an institute in canon law for superiors of religious congregations of women at Loyola University, in Chicago, June 22-26. Applications should be directed to the Reverend Robert W. Mulligan, S.J., Lewis Towers, 820 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago 11, Illinois. 52 Book Reviews [Material for this department should be sent to Book Review Editor, REVIEW FOR RELIGIOUS, West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana.] DIOCESAN PRIEST SAINTS. By Rev. R. A. Hutchinson. Pp. 219. B. Herder Book Company, St. Louis 2, Missouri. 1958. $3.95. The author gives us some insight into his purpose when he writes: "In the past quarter century the number of secular priests in the U. S. has increased 60% .... Though encouraging this figure fails far short of the 125% increase in priests reported by religious orders in the same period. The discrepancy here is the result in part of skillful propaganda on the one hand and confusion about the nobility of the diocesan priesthood on the other." His book is intended to remedy this "situation, but it turns out to be propaganda for the other side. One example will suffice. He writes: "We may think of asceticism in terms of nocturnal prayer, flowing .robes, silent figures gliding down shadowy cloister walks, community life, and the monastery bell. But these are elements of just one kind of asceticism, not all kinds. The ascetical life of the secul:~r priest cannot be considered inferior to that of the monk because it excludes the capuche, shaved tonsure, and the weekly chapter of faults. It does include opportunities for endless self-control, the fostering of gentle-ness, tolerance, and consideration in dealing with the parishioners . . generosity to the needy. (Could a secular priest be generous to the needy if he had given away all his money because of some passage in a spiritual book that said he should be poor?)" Men will forget that vocations are made in heaven and not on earth, that in the matter of vocation the only thing that counts is to choose not the one that is theoretically the most excellent, but to choose the one that God wants chosen. To do God’s will and to do it perfectly, that is sanctity. Theoretically it is true that it is easier to save one’s soul and to achieve sanctity in the religious state--the author to the contrary notwithstanding--but practically only for those whom God has chosen for that life. If the author should attempt another book--and we hope that he will, for he writes well--he would attain his purpose of promoting vocations to the secular priesthood much more surely and effectively if he gave us the biographies of secular priest saints and omitted all pr~paganda.--F;. A. H~,US~,IAt~N, S.J. 53 BOOK REVIEWS Review fo~" Religious BASIL ANTHONY MOREAU. By Canon Etienne Catta and Tony CattY. Translated by Edward L. Heston, C.S.C. Vol. I, pp. xxx~i, 1016; Vol. II, 1108. The Bruce Publishing Company, 400 North Broadway, Milwaukee 1, Wisconsin. 1955. $30.00. It is a widely held error that a scholarly, well-documented biography cannot possibly be as interesting as a so-called popular one. If this were not already many times over proved false, this life of Basil Anthony Mary Moreau would be adequate to accomplish the task. Because of a misunderstanding, the interested parties have indicated, no review copies were distributed at the time of publication, 1955; hence only now is this life being reviewed. It is just that the record should be made complete, for this is the definitive life prepared for the cause of the beatification of the Servant of God, a contemporary of the Curt of Ars. At the outset, however, let us say th~it weighty and controversial affairs, partic~ularly in the history of Holy Cross but pertaining also sonlewhat to the history of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd, are constantly dealt with in this work; these accounts only the specialist in the history of these con-gregations can assess for accuracy and historical wi~rth. Caution is called for indeed in dealing with the life o’f the founder of Holy C’ross, for Father Moreau’s life was filled with controversy. So it is that estimates of his character covered a rather ~ide range. This man, whose cause for beatification has been introduced, had St. Mary Euphrasia PeIletier say of him, "That man is a rod beat.ing us to blood!" She added, "Ah, what an enemy! May God forgive him! . . . He is the cruelest enemy of all our work. Never .could I have dreamed that the human heart was capable of so much treachery." ’The pope of his time, Pius IX, allegedly characterized Father Moreau as "that good old man whom I love." Yet this same pope was not pleased, having ordered this "good old man" to come to Rome, to find the order, at least for a time, not c6mplied with.’ This noncompliance (though based on theological reasoning) should have sealed the fate of any effort to introduce the cause of Father Moreau at Rome. Oddly enough it didn’t. Plus XII encouraged his spiritual children to seek for him the honors of the altar. This book, fbrtunately, is an attempt to put some rationality into the crazy abstractionist portrait that could result from elements like those above. The founder and first superior general of Holy Cross, originally an association of fathers, brothers, and sisters working together under 54 January, 1959 BOOK REVIEWS one superior, has the misfortune of being necessarily classed among those many founders and foundresses (the authors have counted some thirty) more or less repudiated by their spiritual children. Father Moreau’s successor as superior general petitioned that Father Moreau be freed from all his obligations toward the congregation, a petition to which Rome did not accede. Nevertheless, his motherhouse was sold to pay outstanding debts; Father Moreau did not die in a house of Holy Cross, but rather in the home of his two sisters," whither he had gone from a house of his congregation without even the necessaries to celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. How a retiring seminary professor ~tarted on his career as founder and how eventually he came to such straits is the engrossing story of these two massive volumes. Many individuals great and small were respon-sible for his stormy passage--great as the t:ounder of the University of Notre Dame, Father Sorin, and small as the petty sacerdotal literateur whose observations of the lady boarders in the community where he was in residence resulted in "Little Portraits of Great Ladies," a contribution to literature that ran indeed to two editions. Nor do the authors fail to show that the holy founder’s own short-comings played a part in causing him difficulties. However, amidst the frailties which God allows to remain even in His loved ones the spiritual stature of the man stands out. The volumes are filled with material as engrossing as it is well-written, not relative just to the private life of Father Moreau or, more generally, to the progress of his institutes, but pertinent also to the stirring times in which he lived. French politics, the theological scene, the philosophical scene, dominant personalities (like Pius IX), others not dominant but intensely interesting (like Father Sorin) or inspiring (like Father Mollevaut)--all these are presented, their tan-gential influences explored. And many of the incidents recounted are memorable. For instance, there is the occasion when on a walk with Father Moreau the famous French Jesuit De Ravignan urged Basil to enter the Society oi: Jesus with him. They had stopped in the Meudon woods to sit together while De Revignan read aloud to Basil, as was his custom, the life of St. Francis Xavier. Suddenly De Ravignan stood up. Punctuating his persuasion with a gesture toward the nearby Jesuit novitate at Montrouge, he asked, "Do you want to come with me? Do you want to come with me?" It would have been good for Father Moreau, had he joined, good for the Jesuits, but in the long run a loss for the Church. Another interesting event is 55 BOOK REVIEWS Review for Religious the audience with the Pope during which the august hand itself removed from the throat of Father Moreau his winged rabat, a symbol to Rome of Gallican insubordination (and for that reason, it might be added, thoroughly out of place as part of Father Moreau’s apparel). And there are sad events--Father Moreau’s exclusion from the general chapter so that he could exercise no influence. His invitation to another so that he could ruin himself. The general chapter consoled itself, according to one chronicler, that it would not be punished for the faults of its father founder. Truly Father Moreau erected the tree of Holy Cross only to find himself eventually crucified on it. Whether or not this definitive life is the definitive life it is probably too early to j~adge. What is set down here, all 2,000 pages of it, is solid, urbane, well written, though not without traces of the passions that the founder of Holy Cross’s work and actions aroused even, or especially, when he was alive. It is a work that reflects the effort and devotion that have been put into it. Sometimes the materials are skimpy--Father Moreau’s first twenty-two years are covered in twenty-seven pages. And sometimes the writers have contented themselves with telling us of the congregations’ progress without showing how Father Moreau’s life affected these events or was affected by them. But in general this is a worthy work, capabl~. executed. It can be recommended for reading in the dining room of mature religious. A few small points: The erroneous implication seems to be made, on page twenty of volume one, that at the present day a cassock is worn in no preparatory seminary. The reviewer feels that Father Bardeau’s account of Monsignor Simeoni’s audience with the Holy Father, quoted on page 941 of volume two in a footnote, should be put with the record of Father Moreau’s audience with the Pope, since it is an historical document pertaining to that audience and necessary for a balanced view of testimony available about it. On page 856, volume t~)o, the name of the then general of the Society of Jesus is misspelled three times. Moreover, volumes so rich in illustrations (twenty-one in the first volume alone) should accommodate the reader with a listing, preferably at the front of each volume, of the drawings and photographs. But these are tiny defects in a great undertaking successfully prosecuted.-- EARL A. W~s, S.J. 56 January, 1959 BOOK REVIEWS STAGES IN PRAYER. By John G. Arintero, O.P. Translated from the Spanish by Kathleen Pond. Pp. x, 178. B. Herder Book Company, St. Louis 2, Missouri. 1957. $3.25. Stages in Prayer is a short treatise on the phases of progress in the spiritual life. The author, an eminent Spanish theologian, is also known for his Evoluci6n M~stica, a work on mystical the~logy. In Stages in Prayer the author outlines in some detail various levels of prayer. His thesis is clear-cut: the higher levels of prayer are for all Christian souls and not merely for those few who are commonly termed "mystics." These higher phases ought not to be considered as extraordinary, for they are of their own nature ordinary in the perfect Christian life. The book is an attempt to indicate the ordinary manifestations of the various stages in prayer. Admittedly the subject is of its nature difficult to treat clearlyl especially in a spiritual compendium of this sort. Unfortunately the author does little to remedy this inherent difficulty. In an, area where sharp distinctions are important, words such as stages or union are 9mployed loosely and often in different senses from one chapter to the next. Though the author’s stages are based on those of St. Teresa, the classifications of other spiritual writers are used freely and at times without careful indication of the source. Subdivisions of stages in one chapter are raised to the rank of full stages in other chapters, thus" leading to further confusion. At least half of the printed matter in the volume consists of direct or indirect quotations, mostly from Spanish mystics. These quotations are deployed in various places; in the text itself, in lengthy footnotes, as separate chapters, or in the seventy-eight pages of appendices. Unfortunately many of these quotations are not directly to the point under consideration and serve but to confuse an already complicated thought pattern." Moreover, the translator might well have broken down the author’s numerous complex sentences into a size more familiar to English readers; the single seventeen-line sentence on page sixty-nine, for instance, borders on the ludicrous. While not denying that the successful attainment of the higher. stages of prayer depends on God’s grace, the author nevertheless is rather severe with those who do not labor strenuously to attain these heights; in one place he practically assures them of eternal ruin (p. 84). Nowhere does he indicate that there is another acceptable 57 I~OOK REVIEWS Review for Religious school of spirituality which rejects the notion that the more lofty levels can be obtained by all who simply love and try to obtain them. Stages in Prayer contains much valuable material for spiritual directors, especially those who are somewhat reluctant to lead their charges toward the higher forms of prayer. However, the sketchy treatment of complex and disputed problems, together with the numerous unqualified statements which require further explanation, do not recommend the book for the open shelves of the convent or seminary library.--R. GERARD flILBRIGHT, THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES: Text and Commentary. By Giuseppe Ricciotti. Translated by Laurence E. Byrne, C.R.L. Pp. xii, 420. Bruce Publishing Company, 400 North Broadway, Milwaukee 1, Wisconsin. 1958. $8.00. To the books of Al~bot Giuseppe Ricciotti already published in English translation (The History of Israel, The Life of Christ in both the regular and popular abridged editions, and Paul, the Apostle) Bruce now adds The Acts of the Apostles. Those acquainted with Ricciotti’s work will recognize in this volume the same level of "high popularization" which has characterized the previous writings of the Italian scholar. Introductory material deals with the text" of Acts, authorship, sources used by Luke, his purpose in writing, date and composition of the book, and an account of modern criticism. The text itself of Acts, which is a translation of Ricciotti’s original translation of the Greek, is printed at the top of the page ..in’ boldface type; and the rest of the p.age--prac.tically always more City of Saint Louis (Mo.), http://www.geonames.org/4407084 http://cdm17321.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/rfr/id/438 |