Dr. Sherlock's Preservative considered : The first part, and its Defence, proved to contain principles which destroy all right use of reason, Fathers, Councils, undermine divine faith, and abuse moral honesty ; In the second part, forty malicious calumnies and forged untruths laid open ; besides several fanatical principles which destroy all church discipline, and oppose Christs divine authority /

Documents similaires

• A defence of Dr. Sherlock's Preservative against popery, : in reply to a Jesuit's Answer: wherein the R. Father's reasonings are fully confuted. /
  par: W. G. (William Giles)
  Créé le : (1688)
• A vindication of both parts of the Preservative against popery: in answer to the cavils of Lewis Sabran, Jesuit.
  par: Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707
  Créé le : (1688)
• A vindication of both parts of The preservative against popery : in answer to the cavils of Lewis Sabran, Jesuit /
  par: Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707
  Créé le : (1688)
• An Amicable accommodation of the difference between the Representer and the Answerer : in return to the last reply against The Papist protesting against Protestant Popery.
  par: Gother, John, -1704
  Créé le : (1686)
• Husenbeth's defence of the Catholic Church : a complete refutation of the calumnies contained in a work entitled The poor man's preservative against popery by the Reverend Joseph Blanco White ; with a preface by a Catholic layman of Upper Canada ..
  par: Husenbeth, F. C. (Frederick Charles), 1796-1872
  Créé le : (1834)